Literature DB >> 24685836

Long-term improvement of speech perception with the fine structure processing coding strategy in cochlear implants.

Andrea Kleine Punte1, Marc De Bodt, Paul Van de Heyning.   

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate the long-term effects of the fine structure processing (FSP) coding strategy on speech perception in noise and quality of life in experienced cochlear implant (CI) users.
METHODS: In a prospective comparative clinical trial, 32 experienced postlingually deafened CI recipients were upgraded from the Tempo+ to the Opus 2 audio processor, implementing FSP in one group and high-definition continuous interleaved sampling (HDCIS) coding strategy in another group with identical frequency ranges. Speech perception in noise testing and the Speech, Spatial and Qualities (SSQ) questionnaire were administered at 0, 6, 12 and 24 months after the upgrade.
RESULTS: FSP yielded significant long-term improvement of speech perception in noise of in total 13.2 dB from 16.2 dB SNR at the upgrade to 3.0 dB SNR after 24 months of FSP experience. No significant improvement of speech perception in noise over time was measured for the HDCIS group. With the SSQ questionnaire, a significant benefit of the FSP coding strategy was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: The FSP coding strategy as implemented in the Med-EL Opus 2 audio processor improves speech perception in noise. This beneficial effect of FSP on speech perception in noise is not immediate but is significant after 12 months and further improves up to 24 months after implementation of FSP.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24685836     DOI: 10.1159/000360479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec        ISSN: 0301-1569            Impact factor:   1.538


  7 in total

1.  Advantages of Pulse Rate Compared to Modulation Frequency for Temporal Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy; Susan R S Bissmeyer; Andres Camarena
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-03

2.  Comparison of two cochlear implant coding strategies on speech perception.

Authors:  Margaret T Dillon; Emily Buss; English R King; Ellen J Deres; Sarah N Obarowski; Meredith L Anderson; Marcia C Adunka
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2016-10-18

3.  Pitch perception is more robust to interference and better resolved when provided by pulse rate than by modulation frequency of cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Raymond L Goldsworthy; Andres Camarena; Susan R S Bissmeyer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 3.672

4.  Nonhuman primate vestibuloocular reflex responses to prosthetic vestibular stimulation are robust to pulse timing errors caused by temporal discretization.

Authors:  Peter J Boutros; Nicolas S Valentin; Kristin N Hageman; Chenkai Dai; Dale Roberts; Charles C Della Santina
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 2.974

5.  Feasibility of Revision Cochlear Implant Surgery for Better Speech Comprehension.

Authors:  Kyurin Hwang; Jae Yong Lee; Hyeon Seok Oh; Byung Don Lee; Jinsei Jung; Jae Young Choi
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2019-03-13

Review 6.  Cochlear Implant Research and Development in the Twenty-first Century: A Critical Update.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; Tobias Goehring
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-08-25

7.  Temporal Pitch Perception in Cochlear-Implant Users: Channel Independence in Apical Cochlear Regions.

Authors:  Andreas Griessner; Reinhold Schatzer; Viktor Steixner; Gunesh P Rajan; Clemens Zierhofer; Dayse Távora-Vieira
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.