Literature DB >> 24684876

Breast density and breast cancer risk: a practical review.

Amy T Wang1, Celine M Vachon2, Kathleen R Brandt3, Karthik Ghosh4.   

Abstract

New legislation in several states requiring breast density notification in all mammogram reports has increased awareness of breast density. Estimates indicate that up to 50% of women undergoing mammography will have high breast density; thus, with increased attention and high prevalence of increased breast density, it is crucial that primary care clinicians understand the implications of dense breasts and are able to provide appropriate counseling. This review provides an overview of breast density, specifically by defining breast density, exploring the association between breast density and breast cancer risk, both from masking and as an independent risk factor, and reviewing supplemental screening options as part of a larger framework for counseling patients with dense breasts.
Copyright © 2014 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24684876     DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.12.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  26 in total

1.  Development of silica-encapsulated silver nanoparticles as contrast agents intended for dual-energy mammography.

Authors:  Roshan Karunamuni; Pratap C Naha; Kristen C Lau; Ajlan Al-Zaki; Anatoliy V Popov; Edward J Delikatny; Andrew Tsourkas; David P Cormode; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  An all-in-one nanoparticle (AION) contrast agent for breast cancer screening with DEM-CT-MRI-NIRF imaging.

Authors:  Jessica C Hsu; Pratap C Naha; Kristen C Lau; Peter Chhour; Renee Hastings; Brianna F Moon; Joel M Stein; Walter R T Witschey; Elizabeth S McDonald; Andrew D A Maidment; David P Cormode
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 7.790

3.  Gold silver alloy nanoparticles (GSAN): an imaging probe for breast cancer screening with dual-energy mammography or computed tomography.

Authors:  Pratap C Naha; Kristen C Lau; Jessica C Hsu; Maryam Hajfathalian; Shaameen Mian; Peter Chhour; Lahari Uppuluri; Elizabeth S McDonald; Andrew D A Maidment; David P Cormode
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 7.790

4.  Breast Cancer Detection by B7-H3-Targeted Ultrasound Molecular Imaging.

Authors:  Sunitha V Bachawal; Kristin C Jensen; Katheryne E Wilson; Lu Tian; Amelie M Lutz; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Comparison of Clinical and Automated Breast Density Measurements: Implications for Risk Prediction and Supplemental Screening.

Authors:  Kathleen R Brandt; Christopher G Scott; Lin Ma; Amir P Mahmoudzadeh; Matthew R Jensen; Dana H Whaley; Fang Fang Wu; Serghei Malkov; Carrie B Hruska; Aaron D Norman; John Heine; John Shepherd; V Shane Pankratz; Karla Kerlikowske; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Acceptability of an Interactive Computer-Animated Agent to Promote Patient-Provider Communication About Breast Density: a Mixed Method Pilot Study.

Authors:  Christine Gunn; Ariel Maschke; Timothy Bickmore; Mark Kennedy; Margaret F Hopkins; Michael D C Fishman; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Erica T Warner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Comparative effectiveness of combined digital mammography and tomosynthesis screening for women with dense breasts.

Authors:  Christoph I Lee; Mucahit Cevik; Oguzhan Alagoz; Brian L Sprague; Anna N A Tosteson; Diana L Miglioretti; Karla Kerlikowske; Natasha K Stout; Jeffrey G Jarvik; Scott D Ramsey; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Breast parenchymal patterns in processed versus raw digital mammograms: A large population study toward assessing differences in quantitative measures across image representations.

Authors:  Aimilia Gastounioti; Andrew Oustimov; Brad M Keller; Lauren Pantalone; Meng-Kang Hsieh; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 9.  Review of quantitative multiscale imaging of breast cancer.

Authors:  Michael A Pinkert; Lonie R Salkowski; Patricia J Keely; Timothy J Hall; Walter F Block; Kevin W Eliceiri
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-01-22

10.  Gene Methylation and Cytological Atypia in Random Fine-Needle Aspirates for Assessment of Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Vered Stearns; Mary Jo Fackler; Seema A Khan; Saraswati Sukumar; Sidra Hafeez; Zoila Lopez Bujanda; Robert T Chatterton; Lisa K Jacobs; Nagi F Khouri; David Ivancic; Kara Kenney; Christina Shehata; Stacie C Jeter; Judith A Wolfman; Carola M Zalles; Peng Huang
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2016-06-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.