Literature DB >> 27261491

Gene Methylation and Cytological Atypia in Random Fine-Needle Aspirates for Assessment of Breast Cancer Risk.

Vered Stearns1, Mary Jo Fackler1, Seema A Khan2, Saraswati Sukumar1, Sidra Hafeez1, Zoila Lopez Bujanda1, Robert T Chatterton2, Lisa K Jacobs1, Nagi F Khouri1, David Ivancic2, Kara Kenney2, Christina Shehata1, Stacie C Jeter1, Judith A Wolfman2, Carola M Zalles3, Peng Huang1.   

Abstract

Methods to determine individualized breast cancer risk lack sufficient sensitivity to select women most likely to benefit from preventive strategies. Alterations in DNA methylation occur early in breast cancer. We hypothesized that cancer-specific methylation markers could enhance breast cancer risk assessment. We evaluated 380 women without a history of breast cancer. We determined their menopausal status or menstrual cycle phase, risk of developing breast cancer (Gail model), and breast density and obtained random fine-needle aspiration (rFNA) samples for assessment of cytopathology and cumulative methylation index (CMI). Eight methylated gene markers were identified through whole-genome methylation analysis and included novel and previously established breast cancer detection genes. We performed correlative and multivariate linear regression analyses to evaluate DNA methylation of a gene panel as a function of clinical factors associated with breast cancer risk. CMI and individual gene methylation were independent of age, menopausal status or menstrual phase, lifetime Gail risk score, and breast density. CMI and individual gene methylation for the eight genes increased significantly (P < 0.001) with increasing cytological atypia. The findings were verified with multivariate analyses correcting for age, log (Gail), log (percent density), rFNA cell number, and body mass index. Our results demonstrate a significant association between cytological atypia and high CMI, which does not vary with menstrual phase or menopause and is independent of Gail risk and mammographic density. Thus, CMI is an excellent candidate breast cancer risk biomarker, warranting larger prospective studies to establish its utility for cancer risk assessment. Cancer Prev Res; 9(8); 673-82. ©2016 AACR. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27261491      PMCID: PMC4970896          DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-15-0377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)        ISSN: 1940-6215


  45 in total

1.  Atypical hyperplasia and breast cancer risk: a critique.

Authors:  L Ma; N F Boyd
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 2.  Breast density and breast cancer risk: a practical review.

Authors:  Amy T Wang; Celine M Vachon; Kathleen R Brandt; Karthik Ghosh
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at sonographically guided core needle biopsy: frequency, final surgical outcome, and factors associated with underestimation.

Authors:  Benoît Mesurolle; Juan Carlos Hidalgo Perez; Fahad Azzumea; Emmanuelle Lemercier; Xuanqian Xie; Ann Aldis; Atilla Omeroglu; Sarkis Meterissian
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Effect of prevention strategies on survival and quality-adjusted survival of women with BRCA1/2 mutations: an updated decision analysis.

Authors:  Victor R Grann; Judith S Jacobson; Dustin Thomason; Dawn Hershman; Daniel F Heitjan; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Quantitative multiplex methylation-specific PCR analysis doubles detection of tumor cells in breast ductal fluid.

Authors:  Mary Jo Fackler; Kara Malone; Zhe Zhang; Eric Schilling; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Theresa Swift-Scanlan; Julie Lange; Ritu Nayar; Nancy E Davidson; Seema A Khan; Saraswati Sukumar
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Heterogeneity of breast cancer metastases: comparison of therapeutic target expression and promoter methylation between primary tumors and their multifocal metastases.

Authors:  Julie M Wu; Mary Jo Fackler; Marc K Halushka; Diana W Molavi; M Evangeline Taylor; Wei Wen Teo; Constance Griffin; John Fetting; Nancy E Davidson; Angelo M De Marzo; Jessica L Hicks; Dhananjay Chitale; Marc Ladanyi; Saraswati Sukumar; Pedram Argani
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Quantitative multiplex methylation-specific PCR assay for the detection of promoter hypermethylation in multiple genes in breast cancer.

Authors:  Mary Jo Fackler; Megan McVeigh; Jyoti Mehrotra; Marissa A Blum; Julie Lange; Amanda Lapides; Elizabeth Garrett; Pedram Argani; Saraswati Sukumar
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  DNA methyltransferase expression in the human endometrium: down-regulation by progesterone and estrogen.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Yamagata; Hiromi Asada; Isao Tamura; Lifa Lee; Ryo Maekawa; Ken Taniguchi; Toshiaki Taketani; Aki Matsuoka; Hiroshi Tamura; Norihiro Sugino
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Human endometrial DNA methylome is cycle-dependent and is associated with gene expression regulation.

Authors:  Sahar Houshdaran; Zara Zelenko; Juan C Irwin; Linda C Giudice
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2014-05-30

10.  CpG island tumor suppressor promoter methylation in non-BRCA-associated early mammary carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Shauna N Vasilatos; Gloria Broadwater; William T Barry; Joseph C Baker; Siya Lem; Eric C Dietze; Gregory R Bean; Andrew D Bryson; Patrick G Pilie; Vanessa Goldenberg; David Skaar; Carolyn Paisie; Alejandro Torres-Hernandez; Tracey L Grant; Lee G Wilke; Catherine Ibarra-Drendall; Julie H Ostrander; Nicholas C D'Amato; Carola Zalles; Randy Jirtle; Valerie M Weaver; Victoria L Seewaldt
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  3 in total

1.  Tumor and serum DNA methylation in women receiving preoperative chemotherapy with or without vorinostat in TBCRC008.

Authors:  Roisin M Connolly; Mary Jo Fackler; Zhe Zhang; Xian C Zhou; Matthew P Goetz; Judy C Boughey; Bridget Walsh; John T Carpenter; Anna Maria Storniolo; Stanley P Watkins; Edward W Gabrielson; Vered Stearns; Saraswati Sukumar
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-09-16       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Development of an automated liquid biopsy assay for methylated markers in advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Mary Jo Fackler; Suzana Tulac; Neesha Venkatesan; Adam J Aslam; Timothy N de Guzman; Claudia Mercado-Rodriguez; Leslie M Cope; Bradley M Downs; Abdul Hussain Vali; Wanjun Ding; Jennifer Lehman; Rita Denbow; Jeffrey Reynolds; Morgan E Buckley; Kala Visvanathan; Christopher B Umbricht; Antonio C Wolff; Vered Stearns; Michael Bates; Edwin W Lai; Saraswati Sukumar
Journal:  Cancer Res Commun       Date:  2022-06-01

3.  Plasma GBP2 promoter methylation is associated with advanced stages in breast cancer.

Authors:  Farzaneh Rahvar; Mahdieh Salimi; Hossein Mozdarani
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 1.771

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.