Literature DB >> 16753484

Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America.

José Villar1, Eliette Valladares, Daniel Wojdyla, Nelly Zavaleta, Guillermo Carroli, Alejandro Velazco, Archana Shah, Liana Campodónico, Vicente Bataglia, Anibal Faundes, Ana Langer, Alberto Narváez, Allan Donner, Mariana Romero, Sofia Reynoso, Karla Simônia de Pádua, Daniel Giordano, Marius Kublickas, Arnaldo Acosta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Caesarean delivery rates continue to increase worldwide. Our aim was to assess the association between caesarean delivery and pregnancy outcome at the institutional level, adjusting for the pregnant population and institutional characteristics.
METHODS: For the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health, we assessed a multistage stratified sample, comprising 24 geographic regions in eight countries in Latin America. We obtained individual data for all women admitted for delivery over 3 months to 120 institutions randomly selected from of 410 identified institutions. We also obtained institutional-level data.
FINDINGS: We obtained data for 97,095 of 106,546 deliveries (91% coverage). The median rate of caesarean delivery was 33% (quartile range 24-43), with the highest rates of caesarean delivery noted in private hospitals (51%, 43-57). Institution-specific rates of caesarean delivery were affected by primiparity, previous caesarean delivery, and institutional complexity. Rate of caesarean delivery was positively associated with postpartum antibiotic treatment and severe maternal morbidity and mortality, even after adjustment for risk factors. Increase in the rate of caesarean delivery was associated with an increase in fetal mortality rates and higher numbers of babies admitted to intensive care for 7 days or longer even after adjustment for preterm delivery. Rates of preterm delivery and neonatal mortality both rose at rates of caesarean delivery of between 10% and 20%.
INTERPRETATION: High rates of caesarean delivery do not necessarily indicate better perinatal care and can be associated with harm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16753484     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68704-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  210 in total

1.  Availability and quality of emergency obstetric care, an alternative strategy to reduce maternal mortality: experience of Tongji Hospital, Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Ismael Fatou Bangoura; Jian Hu; Xun Gong; Xuanxuan Wang; Jingjing Wei; Wenbin Zhang; Xiang Zhang; Pengqian Fang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2012-04-20

2.  Impact of Anesthetic Predictors on Postpartum Hospital Length of Stay and Adverse Events Following Cesarean Delivery: A Retrospective Study in 840 Consecutive Parturients.

Authors:  Ting Ting Oh; Colleen G Martel; Allison G Clark; Melissa B Russo; Bobby D Nossaman
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2015

Review 3.  Caesarean Delivery Rate Review: An Evidence-Based Analysis.

Authors:  N Degani; N Sikich
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2015-03-01

4.  Do Socioeconomic Inequalities in Neonatal Mortality Reflect Inequalities in Coverage of Maternal Health Services? Evidence from 48 Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Authors:  Britt McKinnon; Sam Harper; Jay S Kaufman
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-02

5.  The impact of payment source and hospital type on rising cesarean section rates in Brazil, 1998 to 2008.

Authors:  Kristine Hopkins; Ernesto Friedrich de Lima Amaral; Aline Nogueira Menezes Mourão
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 3.689

6.  Is planned cesarean childbirth a safe alternative?

Authors:  B Anthony Armson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Maternal and neonatal effects of caesarean section.

Authors:  Allison Shorten
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-10-30

8.  Decision aids for women with a previous caesarean section.

Authors:  Jeremy A Lauer; Ana P Betrán
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-06-23

9.  Methodological considerations in implementing the WHO Global Survey for Monitoring Maternal and Perinatal Health.

Authors:  Archana Shah; Anibal Faundes; M'Imunya Machoki; Vicente Bataglia; Faouzi Amokrane; Allan Donner; Kidza Mugerwa; Guillermo Carroli; Bukola Fawole; Ana Langer; Jean José Wolomby; Alberto Naravaez; Idi Nafiou; Marius Kublickas; Eliette Valladares; Alejandro Velasco; Nelly Zavaleta; Isilda Neves; José Villar
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 9.408

10.  Trends in caesarean delivery by country and wealth quintile: cross-sectional surveys in southern Asia and sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Francesca L Cavallaro; Jenny A Cresswell; Giovanny Va França; Cesar G Victora; Aluísio Jd Barros; Carine Ronsmans
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 9.408

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.