BACKGROUND: This study sought to improve the predicative performance and goodness-of-fit of mapping models, as part of indirect valuation, by introducing cubic spline smoothing to map a group of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures onto a preference-based measure. METHODS: This study was a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional health survey data assessing the HRQOL for patients with colorectal neoplasms. Mapping functions of condition-specific functional assessment of cancer therapy-colorectal (FACT-C) onto preference-based SF-6D measure were developed using a dataset of 553 Chinese subjects with different stages of colorectal neoplasm. The missing values of FACT-C were imputed using multiple imputation. Then three widely applicable models (ordinary least square (OLS), Tobit and two-part models) were employed for the mapping function after applying the cubic spline smoothing on the data. For the evaluation of the effectiveness of cubic spline smoothing and multiple imputation, the goodness-of-fit and prediction performance of each model were compared. RESULTS: Analyses showed that the models fitted with transformed data from cubic spline smoothing offered better performance in goodness-of-fit and prediction than the models fitted with the original data. The values of [Formula: see text] were improved by over 10%, and the root mean square error and the mean absolute error were both reduced. The best goodness-of-fit and performance were achieved by OLS model using transformed data from cubic spline smoothing. CONCLUSIONS: Cubic spline smoothing and multiple imputation were recommended for the mapping of HRQOL measures onto the preference-based measure. Among the three mapping models, the simple-to-use OLS model had the best performance.
BACKGROUND: This study sought to improve the predicative performance and goodness-of-fit of mapping models, as part of indirect valuation, by introducing cubic spline smoothing to map a group of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures onto a preference-based measure. METHODS: This study was a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional health survey data assessing the HRQOL for patients with colorectal neoplasms. Mapping functions of condition-specific functional assessment of cancer therapy-colorectal (FACT-C) onto preference-based SF-6D measure were developed using a dataset of 553 Chinese subjects with different stages of colorectal neoplasm. The missing values of FACT-C were imputed using multiple imputation. Then three widely applicable models (ordinary least square (OLS), Tobit and two-part models) were employed for the mapping function after applying the cubic spline smoothing on the data. For the evaluation of the effectiveness of cubic spline smoothing and multiple imputation, the goodness-of-fit and prediction performance of each model were compared. RESULTS: Analyses showed that the models fitted with transformed data from cubic spline smoothing offered better performance in goodness-of-fit and prediction than the models fitted with the original data. The values of [Formula: see text] were improved by over 10%, and the root mean square error and the mean absolute error were both reduced. The best goodness-of-fit and performance were achieved by OLS model using transformed data from cubic spline smoothing. CONCLUSIONS: Cubic spline smoothing and multiple imputation were recommended for the mapping of HRQOL measures onto the preference-based measure. Among the three mapping models, the simple-to-use OLS model had the best performance.
Authors: Carlos K H Wong; Cindy L K Lam; Donna Rowen; Sarah M McGhee; Ka-Ping Ma; Wai-Lun Law; Jensen T C Poon; Pierre Chan; Dora L W Kwong; Janice Tsang Journal: Value Health Date: 2012-02-17 Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: Carlos K H Wong; Cindy L K Lam; Wai-Lun Law; Jensen T C Poon; Pierre Chan; Dora L W Kwong; Janice Tsang Journal: J Eval Clin Pract Date: 2011-08-18 Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: Carlos K Wong; Cindy L Lam; Wai-Lun Law; Jensen T Poon; Dora L Kwong; Janice Tsang; Yuk-Fai Wan Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2013-02-08 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: I-Chan Huang; Constantine Frangakis; Mark J Atkinson; Richard J Willke; Walter L Leite; W Bruce Vogel; Albert W Wu Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Rachel Meacock; Mark Harrison; Kathleen McElhone; Janice Abbott; Sahena Haque; Ian Bruce; Lee-Suan Teh Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2014-12-16 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Stavros Petrou; Oliver Rivero-Arias; Helen Dakin; Louise Longworth; Mark Oppe; Robert Froud; Alastair Gray Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 4.981
Authors: Stavros Petrou; Oliver Rivero-Arias; Helen Dakin; Louise Longworth; Mark Oppe; Robert Froud; Alastair Gray Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 4.981
Authors: Stavros Petrou; Oliver Rivero-Arias; Helen Dakin; Louise Longworth; Mark Oppe; Robert Froud; Alastair Gray Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2015-08-01 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Stavros Petrou; Oliver Rivero-Arias; Helen Dakin; Louise Longworth; Mark Oppe; Robert Froud; Alastair Gray Journal: Appl Health Econ Health Policy Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 2.561
Authors: Stavros Petrou; Oliver Rivero-Arias; Helen Dakin; Louise Longworth; Mark Oppe; Robert Froud; Alastair Gray Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2015-08-01 Impact factor: 4.147