Literature DB >> 24679933

Using recursion to compute the inverse of the genomic relationship matrix.

I Misztal1, A Legarra2, I Aguilar3.   

Abstract

Computing the inverse of the genomic relationship matrix using recursion was investigated. A traditional algorithm to invert the numerator relationship matrix is based on the observation that the conditional expectation for an additive effect of 1 animal given the effects of all other animals depends on the effects of its sire and dam only, each with a coefficient of 0.5. With genomic relationships, such an expectation depends on all other genotyped animals, and the coefficients do not have any set value. For each animal, the coefficients plus the conditional variance can be called a genomic recursion. If such recursions are known, the mixed model equations can be solved without explicitly creating the inverse of the genomic relationship matrix. Several algorithms were developed to create genomic recursions. In an algorithm with sequential updates, genomic recursions are created animal by animal. That algorithm can also be used to update a known inverse of a genomic relationship matrix for additional genotypes. In an algorithm with forward updates, a newly computed recursion is immediately applied to update recursions for remaining animals. The computing costs for both algorithms depend on the sparsity pattern of the genomic recursions, but are lower or equal than for regular inversion. An algorithm for proven and young animals assumes that the genomic recursions for young animals contain coefficients only for proven animals. Such an algorithm generates exact genomic EBV in genomic BLUP and is an approximation in single-step genomic BLUP. That algorithm has a cubic cost for the number of proven animals and a linear cost for the number of young animals. The genomic recursions can provide new insight into genomic evaluation and possibly reduce costs of genetic predictions with extremely large numbers of genotypes.
Copyright © 2014 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  genomic relationship matrix; genomic selection; preconditioned conjugate gradient (PCG) algorithm; recursion; single-step BLUP

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24679933     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2013-7752

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  37 in total

1.  Sparse single-step genomic BLUP in crossbreeding schemes.

Authors:  Jérémie Vandenplas; Mario P L Calus; Jan Ten Napel
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  The quality of the algorithm for proven and young with various sets of core animals in a multibreed sheep population1.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Nilforooshan; Michael Lee
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Factors affecting GEBV accuracy with single-step Bayesian models.

Authors:  Lei Zhou; Raphael Mrode; Shengli Zhang; Qin Zhang; Bugao Li; Jian-Feng Liu
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Efficient single-step genomic evaluation for a multibreed beef cattle population having many genotyped animals.

Authors:  E A Mäntysaari; R D Evans; I Strandén
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Including crossbred pigs in the genomic relationship matrix through utilization of both linkage disequilibrium and linkage analysis.

Authors:  M W Iversen; Ø Nordbø; E Gjerlaug-Enger; E Grindflek; M S Lopes; T H E Meuwissen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Single-step SNP-BLUP with on-the-fly imputed genotypes and residual polygenic effects.

Authors:  Matti Taskinen; Esa A Mäntysaari; Ismo Strandén
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  On the equivalence between marker effect models and breeding value models and direct genomic values with the Algorithm for Proven and Young.

Authors:  Matias Bermann; Daniela Lourenco; Natalia S Forneris; Andres Legarra; Ignacy Misztal
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 5.100

Review 8.  Genome and Environment Based Prediction Models and Methods of Complex Traits Incorporating Genotype × Environment Interaction.

Authors:  José Crossa; Osval Antonio Montesinos-López; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez; Germano Costa-Neto; Roberto Fritsche-Neto; Rodomiro Ortiz; Johannes W R Martini; Morten Lillemo; Abelardo Montesinos-López; Diego Jarquin; Flavio Breseghello; Jaime Cuevas; Renaud Rincent
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

9.  Emerging issues in genomic selection.

Authors:  Ignacy Misztal; Ignacio Aguilar; Daniela Lourenco; Li Ma; Juan Pedro Steibel; Miguel Toro
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Application of Genomic Data for Reliability Improvement of Pig Breeding Value Estimates.

Authors:  Ekaterina Melnikova; Artem Kabanov; Sergey Nikitin; Maria Somova; Sergey Kharitonov; Petr Otradnov; Olga Kostyunina; Tatiana Karpushkina; Elena Martynova; Aleksander Sermyagin; Natalia Zinovieva
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.