Literature DB >> 29873759

Sparse single-step genomic BLUP in crossbreeding schemes.

Jérémie Vandenplas1, Mario P L Calus1, Jan Ten Napel1.   

Abstract

The algorithm for proven and young animals (APY) efficiently computes an approximated inverse of the genomic relationship matrix, by dividing genotyped animals in the so-called core and noncore animals. The APY leads to computationally feasible single-step genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (ssGBLUP) with a large number of genotyped animals and was successfully applied to real single-breed or line datasets. This study aimed to assess the quality of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) when using the APY (GEBVAPY), in comparison to GEBV when using the directly inverted genomic relationship matrix (GEBVDIRECT), for situations based on crossbreeding schemes, including F1 and F2 crosses, such as the ones for pigs and chickens. Based on simulations of a 3-way crossbreeding program, we compared different approximated inverses of a genomic relationship matrix, by varying the size and the composition of the core group. We showed that GEBVAPY were accurate approximations of GEBVDIRECT for multivariate ssGBLUP involving different breeds and their crosses. GEBVAPY as accurate as GEBVDIRECT were obtained when the core groups included animals from different breed compositions and when the core groups had a size between the numbers of the largest eigenvalues explaining 98% and 99% of the variation in the raw genomic relationship matrix.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29873759      PMCID: PMC6095390          DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  26 in total

1.  Implementation of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor for US Holsteins with a large number of genotyped animals.

Authors:  Y Masuda; I Misztal; S Tsuruta; A Legarra; I Aguilar; D A L Lourenco; B O Fragomeni; T J Lawlor
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.034

2.  Comparing individual means in the analysis of variance.

Authors:  J W TUKEY
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1949-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  QMSim: a large-scale genome simulator for livestock.

Authors:  Mehdi Sargolzaei; Flavio S Schenkel
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  The generalisation of student's problems when several different population variances are involved.

Authors:  B L WELCH
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  1947       Impact factor: 2.445

5.  Selection of core animals in the Algorithm for Proven and Young using a simulation model.

Authors:  H L Bradford; I Pocrnić; B O Fragomeni; D A L Lourenco; I Misztal
Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 6.  BOARD INVITED REVIEW: The purebred-crossbred correlation in pigs: A review of theory, estimates, and implications.

Authors:  Y C J Wientjes; M P L Calus
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Efficient single-step genomic evaluation for a multibreed beef cattle population having many genotyped animals.

Authors:  E A Mäntysaari; R D Evans; I Strandén
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Genetic evaluation using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in American Angus.

Authors:  D A L Lourenco; S Tsuruta; B O Fragomeni; Y Masuda; I Aguilar; A Legarra; J K Bertrand; T S Amen; L Wang; D W Moser; I Misztal
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Sparse single-step method for genomic evaluation in pigs.

Authors:  Tage Ostersen; Ole F Christensen; Per Madsen; Mark Henryon
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped.

Authors:  Ole F Christensen; Mogens S Lund
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 4.297

View more
  5 in total

1.  The quality of the algorithm for proven and young with various sets of core animals in a multibreed sheep population1.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Nilforooshan; Michael Lee
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  On the equivalence between marker effect models and breeding value models and direct genomic values with the Algorithm for Proven and Young.

Authors:  Matias Bermann; Daniela Lourenco; Natalia S Forneris; Andres Legarra; Ignacy Misztal
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 5.100

3.  Crossbred evaluations using single-step genomic BLUP and algorithm for proven and young with different sources of data1.

Authors:  Ivan Pocrnic; Daniela A L Lourenco; Ching-Yi Chen; William O Herring; Ignacy Misztal
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  A comprehensive study on size and definition of the core group in the proven and young algorithm for single-step GBLUP.

Authors:  Rostam Abdollahi-Arpanahi; Daniela Lourenco; Ignacy Misztal
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 4.297

5.  Is single-step genomic REML with the algorithm for proven and young more computationally efficient when less generations of data are present?

Authors:  Vinícius Silva Junqueira; Daniela Lourenco; Yutaka Masuda; Fernando Flores Cardoso; Paulo Sávio Lopes; Fabyano Fonseca E Silva; Ignacy Misztal
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 3.338

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.