| Literature DB >> 24679169 |
Viktor H Koelzer, Alessandro Lugli, Heather Dawson, Marion Hädrich, Martin D Berger, Markus Borner, Makhmudbek Mallaev, José A Galván, Jennifer Amsler, Beat Schnüriger, Inti Zlobec1, Daniel Inderbitzin.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Reliable prognostic markers based on biopsy specimens of colorectal cancer (CRC) are currently missing. We hypothesize that assessment of T-cell infiltration in biopsies of CRC may predict patient survival and TNM-stage before surgery.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24679169 PMCID: PMC4022053 DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-12-81
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Figure 1Visualization of immune infiltrates in biopsy material and study design. A: Visualization of immune infiltrates and tumor cells by immunohistochemical double-stain for CD8 (upper panel) or CD45RO (lower panel) and pancytokeratin in biopsy material (overview x 50, inset x 300). Stromal infiltrates are indicated by *, arrows indicate intraepithelial CD8+ or CD45RO+ T-cells. B: Study Design. 346 CRC patients were entered into the study, 185 of which had matched biopsies. Histopathological features and clinical data were re-reviewed. Immunohistochemistry for pancytokeratin and CD8 or CD45RO was performed. CD8+ and CD45RO+ T-cell infiltrates in biopsy specimens were evaluated in five HPF each of stroma and neoplastic epithelium. T-cell infiltrates were analysed for prediction of patient survival and histopathologic features of the matched resection specimen.
Patient characteristics and association of CD8+ cells (intra- and peri-tumoral) with clinicopathological data (max n = 130)
| | | | | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) (n = 130) | Median (min, max) | 72 (30-91) | 71.4 (30-91) | 73.8 (50-90) | 0.3872 | 72.4 (30-91) | 71 (30-90) | 0.876 |
| Gender (n = 130) | Male | 80 (61.5) | 61 (61.0) | 19 (63.3) | 1.0 | 40 (61.5) | 40 (61.5) | 1.0 |
| | Female | 50 (38.5) | 39 (39.0) | 11 (36.7) | | 25 (38.5) | 25 (38.5) | |
| Histological subtype (n = 130) | Non-mucinous | 106 (81.5) | 80 (80.0) | 26 (86.7) | 0.5923 | 49 (75.4) | 57 (87.7) | 0.1123 |
| | Mucinous | 24 (18.5) | 20 (20.0) | 4 (13.3) | | 16 (24.6) | 8 (12.3) | |
| Tumour location (n = 129) | Left | 43 (33.3) | 33 (33.3) | 10 (33.3) | 0.8606 | 21 (32.3) | 22 (34.4) | 0.7333 |
| | Rectum | 30 (23.3) | 22 (22.2) | 8 (26.7) | | 17 (26.2) | 13 (20.3) | |
| | Right | 56 (43.4) | 44 (44.4) | 12 (40.0) | | 27 (41.5) | 29 (45.3) | |
| pT (n = 130) | pT1 + pT2 | 30 (23.1) | 15 (15.0) | 15 (50.0) | <0.0001 | 12 (18.5) | 18 (27.7) | 0.2979 |
| | pT3 + pT4 | 100 (76.9) | 85 (85.0) | 15 (50.0) | | 53 (81.5) | 47 (72.3) | |
| pN (n = 130) | pN0 | 54 (41.5) | 34 (34.0) | 20 (66.7) | 0.0015 | 26 (40.0) | 28 (43.1) | 0.8588 |
| | pN1-2 | 76 (58.5) | 66 (66.0) | 10 (33.3) | | 39 (60.0) | 37 (56.9) | |
| cT (n = 30) | cT1-2 | 9 (31.0) | 6 (27.3) | 3 (42.9) | 0.6424 | 5 (45.5) | 4 (22.2) | 0.2371 |
| | cT3-4 | 20 (69.0) | 16 (72.7) | 4 (57.1) | | 6 (54.6) | 14 (77.8) | |
| cN (n = 113) | cN0 | 68 (62.4) | 50 (59.5) | 18 (72.0) | 0.2583 | 32 (57.1) | 36 (67.9) | 0.3229 |
| | cN1-2 | 41 (37.6) | 34 (40.5) | 7 (28.0) | | 24 (42.9) | 17 (32.1) | |
| No. LN collected (n = 130) | Median (min, max) | 22 (4-73) | 23.0 (6-67) | 16.5 (4-73) | 0.0842 | 23.0 (4-67) | 18 (6-73) | 0.1369 |
| Tumour deposits (n = 108) | 0 | 91 (84.3) | 67 (79.8) | 24 (100.0) | 0.0117 | 42 (82.4) | 49 (86.0) | 0.792 |
| | ≥1 | 17 (15.7) | 17 (20.2) | 0 (0.0) | | 9 (17.7) | 8 (14.0) | |
| Metastasis (n = 123) | cM0 | 86 (69.9) | 63 (67.0) | 23 (79.3) | 0.2519 | 42 (68.8) | 44 (71.0) | 0.8457 |
| | cM1 | 37 (30.1) | 31 (33.0) | 6 (20.7) | | 19 (31.2) | 18 (29.0) | |
| Lymphatic invasion (n = 113) | L0 | 29 (25.7) | 17 (19.3) | 12 (48.0) | 0.008 | 10 (18.5) | 19 (32.2) | 0.1312 |
| | L1 | 84 (74.3) | 71 (80.7) | 13 (53.0) | | 44 (81.5) | 40 (67.8) | |
| Venous invasion (n = 114) | V0 | 57 (50.0) | 39 (44.3) | 18 (69.2) | 0.0433 | 26 (47.3) | 31 (52.5) | 0.708 |
| | V1-2 | 57 (50.0) | 49 (55.7) | 8 (30.8) | | 29 (52.7) | 28 (47.5) | |
| Perineural invasion (n = 111) | Pn0 | 100 (90.1) | 75 (87.2) | 25 (100.0) | 0.0671 | 48 (90.6) | 52 (89.7) | 1.0 |
| | Pn1 | 11 (9.1) | 11 (12.8) | 0 (0.0) | | 5 (9.4) | 6 (10.3) | |
| Tumour grade (n = 130) | G1-2 | 85 (65.4) | 66 (66.0) | 19 (63.3) | 0.8286 | 40 (61.5) | 45 (69.2) | 0.3566 |
| | G3 | 45 (34.6) | 34 (34.0) | 11 (36.7) | | 25 (38.5) | 20 (30.8) | |
| Postoperative therapy (n = 127) | None | 88 (69.3) | 65 (66.3) | 23 (79.3) | 0.2524 | 41 (64.1) | 47 (74.6) | 0.2491 |
| | Yes | 39 (30.7) | 33 (33.7) | 6 (20.7) | | 23 (36.0) | 16 (25.4) | |
| MMR status (n = 117) | Proficient | 99 (84.6) | 77 (85.6) | 22 (81.5) | 0.5596 | 52 (89.7) | 47 (79.7) | 0.1996 |
| | Deficient | 18 (15.4) | 13 (14.4) | 5 (18.5) | | 6 (10.3) | 12 (20.3) | |
| Survival time (n = 76) | Median (95% CI) months | 73.5 (29-105) | 53.1 (22.6-73.9) | Not reached | 0.0026 | 26.4 (13.7-73.5) | 105.4 (54.9-NE) | 0.0053 |
Figure 2Prognostic effects of CD8 and CD45RO T-cell infiltration in the pre-operative biopsy. A, B: Strong infiltration by CD8 cells in the pre-operative biopsy predicted a significantly prolonged survival independent of stromal or intraepithelial location (CD8i: p = 0.0026; 75th-percentile as cut-off, >6.2 cells; CD8s: p = 0.0011; 50th percentile as cut-off, >37.6 cells). C, D: Patients with strong CD45ROs infiltration derived a significant survival benefit (CD45ROs: p = 0.0031; 50th-percentile as cut-off, >56.6 cells). No significant associations with survival time were observed for CD45ROi infiltrates (CD45ROi; p = 0.0941; 50th percentile as cut-off, > 3.4 cells).
Multivariable analysis of CD8 and CD45RO with pT. pN, cM, and postoperative therapy
| | | | | | | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marker | Low | 1.0 | 0.0038 | 1.0 | 0.0049 | 1.0 | 0.2644 | 1.0 | 0.0213 |
| | High | 0.55 (0.36-0.82) | | 0.72 (0.57-0.9) | | 0.88 (0.71-1.1) | | 0.76 (0.61-0.96) | |
| pT | pT1-2 | 1.0 | 0.9525 | 1.0 | 0.4854 | 1.0 | 0.3584 | 1.0 | 0.4897 |
| | pT3-4 | 1.03 (0.39-2.75) | | 1.41 (0.54-3.67) | | 1.59 (0.6-4.3) | | 1.41 (0.53-3.72) | |
| pN | pN0 | 1.0 | 0.6523 | 1.0 | 0.7057 | 1.0 | 0.6596 | 1.0 | 0.3729 |
| | pN1-2 | 0.82 (0.36-1.9) | | 0.85 (0.37-1.95) | | 0.83 (0.36-1.9) | | 0.69 (0.3-1.6) | |
| cM | cM0 | 1.0 | 0.0683 | 1.0 | 0.0485 | 1.0 | 0.1844 | 1.0 | 0.1348 |
| | cM1 | 2.05 (0.95-4.4) | | 2.2 (1.01-4.81) | | 1.7 (0.78-3.7) | | 1.8 (0.83-3.9) | |
| Postoperative therapy | None | 1.0 | 0.2672 | 1.0 | 0.2425 | 1.0 | 0.3805 | 1.0 | 0.4301 |
| Yes | 0.63 (0.28-1.42) | 0.63 (0.29-1.37) | 0.7 (0.32-1.55) | 0.73 (0.33-1.6) |
Figure 3Clinical application example. Slides are first scanned under low magnification and regions of densest CD8i T-cell infiltrates are identified. CD8i T-cells infiltrates are then quantified in five HPF of highest density (HPF area 0.1886 mm2). The probability of lymph node metastasis can be determined based on a nomogram of CD8i counts. The fewer T-cells in the biopsy, the greater the risk of nodal metastasis.
Combination of CD8i and CD45p for prediction of pN + (n = 130) shown are frequency (n) and column percent (%)
| pN0 | 11 (21.6) | 31 (49.2) | 12 (75.0) | 54 | 0.0002 |
| pN+ | 40 (78.4) | 32 (50.8) | 4 (25.0) | 76 | |
| Total | 51 | 63 | 16 | 130 |