Literature DB >> 23122343

ACR Appropriateness Criteria pretreatment staging of colorectal cancer.

Catherine Dewhurst1, Max P Rosen, Michael A Blake, Mark E Baker, Brooks D Cash, Jeff L Fidler, Frederick L Greene, Nicole M Hindman, Bronwyn Jones, Douglas S Katz, Tasneem Lalani, Frank H Miller, William C Small, Gary S Sudakoff, Mark Tulchinsky, Vahid Yaghmai, Judy Yee.   

Abstract

Because virtually all patients with colonic cancer will undergo some form of surgical therapy, the role of preoperative imaging is directed at determining the presence or absence of synchronous carcinomas or adenomas and local or distant metastases. In contrast, preoperative staging for rectal carcinoma has significant therapeutic implications and will direct the use of radiation therapy, surgical excision, or chemotherapy. CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis is recommended for the initial evaluation for the preoperative assessment of patients with colorectal carcinoma. Although the overall accuracy of CT varies directly with the stage of colorectal carcinoma, CT can accurately assess the presence of metastatic disease. MRI using endorectal coils can accurately assess the depth of bowel wall penetration of rectal carcinomas. Phased-array coils provide additional information about lymph node involvement. Adding diffusion-weighted imaging to conventional MRI yields better diagnostic accuracy than conventional MRI alone. Transrectal ultrasound can distinguish layers within the rectal wall and provides accurate assessment of the depth of tumor penetration and perirectal spread, and PET and PET/CT have been shown to alter therapy in almost one-third of patients with advanced primary rectal cancer. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23122343     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2012.07.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  24 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of imaging in rectal cancer: multimodality imaging with MDCT, MRI, and PET.

Authors:  Siva P Raman; Yifei Chen; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-04

Review 2.  Focal liver lesions detection and characterization: The advantages of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI.

Authors:  Stefano Palmucci
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2014-07-27

Review 3.  Multimodal imaging evaluation in staging of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Suk Hee Heo; Jin Woong Kim; Sang Soo Shin; Yong Yeon Jeong; Heoung-Keun Kang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Clinical oncologic applications of PET/MRI: a new horizon.

Authors:  Sasan Partovi; Andres Kohan; Christian Rubbert; Jose Luis Vercher-Conejero; Chiara Gaeta; Roger Yuh; Lisa Zipp; Karin A Herrmann; Mark R Robbin; Zhenghong Lee; Raymond F Muzic; Peter Faulhaber; Pablo R Ros
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-03-20

5.  An appraisal of the computed axial tomographic appearance of the human mesentery based on mesenteric contiguity from the duodenojejunal flexure to the mesorectal level.

Authors:  J Calvin Coffey; Kevin Culligan; Leon G Walsh; Rishab Sehgal; Colum Dunne; Deirdre McGrath; Dara Walsh; Michael Moore; Marie Staunton; Timothy Scanlon; Catherine Dewhurst; Bryan Kenny; Conor O'Riordan; Julie M O'Brien; Fabio Quondamatteo; Peter Dockery
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-18       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Computerized Tomography Criteria as a Tool for Simplifying the Assessment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Oren Gal; Dan Feldman; Amir Mari; Fadi Abu Baker; Dan Hebron; Yael Kopelman
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2020-03

7.  The role of 3-D endorectal ultrasound in rectal cancer: our experience.

Authors:  Nikola Y Kolev; Anton Y Tonev; Valentin L Ignatov; Aleksander K Zlatarov; Vasil M Bojkov; Tanya D Kirilova; Elitsa Encheva; Krasimir Ivanov
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr

8.  Rectal cancer staging: Multidetector-row computed tomography diagnostic accuracy in assessment of mesorectal fascia invasion.

Authors:  Davide Ippolito; Silvia Girolama Drago; Cammillo Talei Franzesi; Davide Fior; Sandro Sironi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Preoperative evaluation of colorectal cancer using CT colonography, MRI, and PET/CT.

Authors:  Shigeyoshi Kijima; Takahiro Sasaki; Koichi Nagata; Kenichi Utano; Alan T Lefor; Hideharu Sugimoto
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Role of preoperative CT colonography in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Lapo Sali; Massimo Falchini; Antonio Taddei; Mario Mascalchi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.