| Literature DB >> 24679068 |
Ebenezer S Owusu Adjah1, Andrie G Panayiotou.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Media messages have been used in Ghana to promote insecticide-treated net (ITN)/bed net usage in an effort to impact on malaria prevention. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of such malaria-related messages delivered through electronic/print media and by volunteers/health workers on the use of ITNs by children living in a household.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24679068 PMCID: PMC3997841 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-13-123
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Socio-demographic characteristics of the participating households (n = 11 778)
| | |
| 44.39 ± 0.15 | |
| | |
| 1–4 members | 7479 (65.9) |
| 5–9 members | 3906 (31.5) |
| 10+ members | 393 (2.6) |
| *p-value | < 0.0001 |
| Rural area | 6603 (52.2) |
| Urban area | 5175 (47.8) |
| *p-value | < 0.0001 |
| Male | 8043 (66.3) |
| Female | 3735 (33.7) |
| *p-value | < 0.0001 |
| Poorest | 2490 (15.4) |
| Poorer | 2291 (19.1) |
| Middle | 2354 (21.6) |
| Richer | 2402 (22.5) |
| Richest | 2241 (21.4) |
| *p-value | < 0.0001 |
| Yes | 5652 (45.4) |
| No | 6125 (54.6) |
| *p-value | < 0.0001 |
| none | 6126 (54.6) |
| 1–2 nets | 4795 (39.8) |
| 3 or more nets | 857 (5.7) |
| *p-value | < 0.0001 |
*p-value for the differences between distribution of demographic subgroups using chi-square test for proportions.
Associations between malaria related messages and number of children sleeping under a net the previous night
| 2.79 | 2.07 to 3.78 | < 0.0001 | 3.06 | 2.27 to 4.12 | < 0.0001 | |
| 0.62 | 0.55 to 0.71 | < 0.0001 | 0.90 | 0.78 to 1.05 | 0.1851 | |
| 1.22 | 1.04 to 1.43 | 0.0165 | 1.18 | 1.00 to 1.40 | 0.0487 | |
| 0.72 | 0.60 to 0.86 | < 0.0004 | 0.86 | 0.71 to 1.05 | 0.1374 | |
| 1.04 | 0.92 to 1.18 | 0.5118 | 1.18 | 1.03 to 1.35 | 0.0145 | |
| 0.93 | 0.76 to 1.14 | 0.5086 | 0.99 | 0.81 to 1.24 | 0.9868 | |
| 1.70 | 1.50 to 1.93 | < 0.0001 | 1.65 | 1.44 to 1.88 | < 0.0001 | |
| 1.20 | 1.04 to 1.38 | 0.0115 | 1.05 | 1.91 to 1.23 | 0.4947 | |
| 1.41 | 1.28 to 1.65 | < 0.0001 | 1.26 | 1.12 to 1.42 | 0.0002 | |
*adjusted for age and sex of head of household.
†adjusted for age and sex of head of household, type of place of residence, household wealth index and household size.
Adjusted stratum-specific estimates for sex of household head
| | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.68 (1.92, 3.73) | 4.41 (1.96, 9.91) | 0.2596 | |
| 1.11 (0.94, 1.31) | 1.13 (0.85,1.51) | 0.9194 | |
| 1.36 (1.14, 1.63) | 1.33 (0.99, 1.79) | 0.8813 | |
| 1.12 (0.92, 1.37) | 1.11 (0.75, 1.64) | 0.9669 | |
| 1.25 (1.09, 1.44) | 1.41 (1.11, 1.80) | 0.3841 | |
| 1.27 (1.02, 1.58) | 1.18 (0.81, 1.73) | 0.7473 | |
| 1.67 (1.47, 1.91) | 2.13 (1.65, 2.74) | 0.0975 | |
| 1.42 (1.22, 1.65) | 1.69 (1.29, 2.22) | 0.2724 | |
| 1.43 (1.25,1.63) | 1.55 (1.23, 1.97) | 0.5543 | |
*Breslow Day test of homogeneity of ORs.
Adjusted stratum-specific estimates for type of place of residence
| | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 8.58 (3.19,23.08) | 2.34 (1.69,3.22) | 0.0089 | |
| 1.01 (0.77,1.32) | 1.17 (0.98,1.39) | 0.3664 | |
| 1.08 (0.81,1.45) | 1.45 (1.23,1.76) | 0.0764 | |
| 1.03 (0.81,1.32) | 1.22 (0.94,1.58) | 0.3585 | |
| 1.30 (1.04,1.61) | 1.28 (1.10,1.48) | 0.9209 | |
| 1.22 (0.94,1.59) | 1.28 (0.97,1.67) | 0.8231 | |
| 1.80 (1.46,2.23) | 1.75 (1.52,2.02) | 0.8267 | |
| 1.46 (1.15,1.85) | 1.48 (1.26,1.73) | 0.9296 | |
| 1.45 (1.20,1.81) | 1.45 (1.26,1.67) | 0.9088 | |
*Breslow Day test of homogeneity of ORs.