PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic performance of 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) for the preoperative TNM staging of gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was approved by our Institutional Review Board. Forty-nine consecutive patients with histologically confirmed gastric cancers underwent MDCT and 3T MRI followed by surgery. MRI without DWI, MRI with DWI, and MDCT were reviewed to determine preoperative TNM staging. Using the pathologic stages as the reference standard, the diagnostic performance of each imaging modality was compared. RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracies of MRI with DWI, MRI without DWI, and MDCT did not show a significant difference (≤T2 vs. ≥T3: 85.1%, 78.7%, and 80.9%; ≤T3 vs. T4: 76.6%, 74.5%, and 72.3%; N-negative vs. N-positive: 76.6%, 66.0%, and 63.8%; M0 vs. M1: all 95.9%, respectively) (P > 0.05). For N staging, MRI with DWI demonstrated higher sensitivity but lower specificity (86.7% and 58.8%, respectively) than MRI without DWI (50.0% and 94.1%) or MDCT (43.3% and 100%) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The diagnostic accuracy of 3T MRI is comparable to that of MDCT for the preoperative TNM staging of gastric cancer, and for assessing LN metastasis, the addition of DWI to conventional MRI may increase the sensitivity.
PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic performance of 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) for the preoperative TNM staging of gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was approved by our Institutional Review Board. Forty-nine consecutive patients with histologically confirmed gastric cancers underwent MDCT and 3T MRI followed by surgery. MRI without DWI, MRI with DWI, and MDCT were reviewed to determine preoperative TNM staging. Using the pathologic stages as the reference standard, the diagnostic performance of each imaging modality was compared. RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracies of MRI with DWI, MRI without DWI, and MDCT did not show a significant difference (≤T2 vs. ≥T3: 85.1%, 78.7%, and 80.9%; ≤T3 vs. T4: 76.6%, 74.5%, and 72.3%; N-negative vs. N-positive: 76.6%, 66.0%, and 63.8%; M0 vs. M1: all 95.9%, respectively) (P > 0.05). For N staging, MRI with DWI demonstrated higher sensitivity but lower specificity (86.7% and 58.8%, respectively) than MRI without DWI (50.0% and 94.1%) or MDCT (43.3% and 100%) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The diagnostic accuracy of 3T MRI is comparable to that of MDCT for the preoperative TNM staging of gastric cancer, and for assessing LN metastasis, the addition of DWI to conventional MRI may increase the sensitivity.
Authors: Alicia S Borggreve; Lucas Goense; Hylke J F Brenkman; Stella Mook; Gert J Meijer; Frank J Wessels; Marcel Verheij; Edwin P M Jansen; Richard van Hillegersberg; Peter S N van Rossum; Jelle P Ruurda Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 3.039