Literature DB >> 29861611

Feasibility of differentiating T3 from T4a gastric cancer in different Lauren classification by determining serosa invasion: Diagnostic performance of high enhanced serosa sign.

Rui-Jia Sun1, Lei Tang1, Ying Chen1, Xiao-Ting Li1, Yu Sun2, Zi-Yu Li3, Ying-Shi Sun1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the value of high enhanced serosa sign on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in differentiating T3 from T4a gastric cancer in different Lauren classification.
METHODS: This study included 276 consecutive patients with surgically confirmed pT3 or pT4a gastric cancers. The pre-operative CT images were reviewed by two radiologists blinded. The demonstration of the high enhanced serosa on CT between T3 and T4a was compared with chi-square test. The diagnostic performance of this sign on CT in the differentiation of T4a from T3 in different Lauren classification was calculated.
RESULTS: The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for the judgement of serosa invasion using the high enhanced serosa sign on CT was 74.6%, 63.7%, 83.6%, 76.0% and 73.8% by one radiologist and 76.4%, 66.1%, 84.9%, 78.1% and 75.4% by the other radiologist. Compared to the intestinal-type, the sensitivity of the judgement of serosa invasion using the high enhanced serosa sign on CT in diffuse-type was significant higher (80% in both readers), while the specificity trended to be lower (65.9% and 80.5%, respectively). There is no significant difference in the accuracy of diagnosis between intestinal-type and diffuse-type of gastric cancers (the P-values of two radiologists were 0.968, 0.591, respectively). The combination of the high enhanced serosa sign with conventional CT signs is significant different in diagnosis of T3 and T4a (P<0.001). The diagnostic accuracy was increased in both radiologists after the combination. The two readers achieved substantial agreement, with Kappa coefficient of 0.63, P<0.001.
CONCLUSIONS: The high enhanced serosa sign on CT is associated with serosa involvement. The sensitivity of the judgement of serosa invasion using this sign on CT in diffuse-type was significant higher than that in intestinal-type.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; gastric cancer; imaging; serosa invasion; staging

Year:  2018        PMID: 29861611      PMCID: PMC5953962          DOI: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2018.02.09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res        ISSN: 1000-9604            Impact factor:   5.087


  27 in total

1.  THE TWO HISTOLOGICAL MAIN TYPES OF GASTRIC CARCINOMA: DIFFUSE AND SO-CALLED INTESTINAL-TYPE CARCINOMA. AN ATTEMPT AT A HISTO-CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION.

Authors:  P LAUREN
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand       Date:  1965

2.  Preoperative apparent diffusion coefficient value of gastric cancer by diffusion-weighted imaging: Correlations with postoperative TNM staging.

Authors:  Song Liu; Hao Wang; Wenxian Guan; Liang Pan; Zhuping Zhou; Haiping Yu; Tian Liu; Xiaofeng Yang; Jian He; Zhengyang Zhou
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Diagnostic performance of 64-section CT using CT gastrography in preoperative T staging of gastric cancer according to 7th edition of AJCC cancer staging manual.

Authors:  Jin Woong Kim; Sang Soo Shin; Suk Hee Heo; Yoo Duk Choi; Hyo Soon Lim; Young Kyu Park; Chang Hwan Park; Yong Yeon Jeong; Heoung Keun Kang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Signet ring cell type and other histologic types: differing clinical course and prognosis in T1 gastric cancer.

Authors:  Beom Su Kim; Seong Tae Oh; Jeong Hwan Yook; Byung Sik Kim
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Diagnosis of gastric cancer with MDCT using the water-filling method and multiplanar reconstruction: CT-histologic correlation.

Authors:  Kensaku Shimizu; Katsunori Ito; Naofumi Matsunaga; Ayame Shimizu; Yasuhiko Kawakami
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Differences between biopsy- or specimen-related Laurén and World Health Organization classification in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Uta Flucke; Stefan P Mönig; Stephan E Baldus; Thomas K Zirbes; Elfriede Bollschweiler; Jürgen Thiele; Hans P Dienes; Arnulf H Hölscher
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-12-04       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Sandwich sign of Borrmann type 4 gastric cancer on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Xiao-Peng Zhang; Lei Tang; Ying-Shi Sun; Zi-Yu Li; Jia-Fu Ji; Xiao-Ting Li; Yi-Qiang Liu; Qi Wu
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Gastric cancer: The role of diffusion weighted imaging in the preoperative staging.

Authors:  R Caivano; P Rabasco; A Lotumolo; F D' Antuono; A Zandolino; A Villonio; L Macarini; G Guglielmi; M Salvatore; A Cammarota
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.176

9.  MDCT features in the differentiation of T4a gastric cancer from less-advanced gastric cancer: significance of the hyperattenuating serosa sign.

Authors:  T U Kim; S Kim; J W Lee; N K Lee; T Y Jeon; D Y Park
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Clinical Relevance of the Tumor Location-Modified Lauren Classification System of Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Jang Kyu Choi; Young Suk Park; Do Hyun Jung; Sang Yong Son; Sang Hoon Ahn; Do Joong Park; Hyung Ho Kim
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.720

View more
  1 in total

1.  Usefulness of histologic differences and perivascular infiltration for preoperative T staging of advanced gastric cancer using computed tomography.

Authors:  Ji Youn Kim; Woo-Suk Chung; Hyeun Jin Lee; Ji Hae An; Jang Shin Son
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.374

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.