PURPOSE: To quantify fundus autofluorescence (qAF) in patients with recessive Stargardt disease (STGD1). METHODS: A total of 42 STGD1 patients (ages: 7-52 years) with at least one confirmed disease-associated ABCA4 mutation were studied. Fundus AF images (488-nm excitation) were acquired with a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope equipped with an internal fluorescent reference to account for variable laser power and detector sensitivity. The gray levels (GLs) of each image were calibrated to the reference, zero GL, magnification, and normative optical media density to yield qAF. Texture factor (TF) was calculated to characterize inhomogeneities in the AF image and patients were assigned to the phenotypes of Fishman I through III. RESULTS: Quantified fundus autofluorescence in 36 of 42 patients and TF in 27 of 42 patients were above normal limits for age. Young patients exhibited the relatively highest qAF, with levels up to 8-fold higher than healthy eyes. Quantified fundus autofluorescence and TF were higher in Fishman II and III than Fishman I, who had higher qAF and TF than healthy eyes. Patients carrying the G1916E mutation had lower qAF and TF than most other patients, even in the presence of a second allele associated with severe disease. CONCLUSIONS: Quantified fundus autofluorescence is an indirect approach to measuring RPE lipofuscin in vivo. We report that ABCA4 mutations cause significantly elevated qAF, consistent with previous reports indicating that increased RPE lipofuscin is a hallmark of STGD1. Even when qualitative differences in fundus AF images are not evident, qAF can elucidate phenotypic variation. Quantified fundus autofluorescence will serve to establish genotype-phenotype correlations and as an outcome measure in clinical trials.
PURPOSE: To quantify fundus autofluorescence (qAF) in patients with recessive Stargardt disease (STGD1). METHODS: A total of 42 STGD1patients (ages: 7-52 years) with at least one confirmed disease-associated ABCA4 mutation were studied. Fundus AF images (488-nm excitation) were acquired with a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope equipped with an internal fluorescent reference to account for variable laser power and detector sensitivity. The gray levels (GLs) of each image were calibrated to the reference, zero GL, magnification, and normative optical media density to yield qAF. Texture factor (TF) was calculated to characterize inhomogeneities in the AF image and patients were assigned to the phenotypes of Fishman I through III. RESULTS: Quantified fundus autofluorescence in 36 of 42 patients and TF in 27 of 42 patients were above normal limits for age. Young patients exhibited the relatively highest qAF, with levels up to 8-fold higher than healthy eyes. Quantified fundus autofluorescence and TF were higher in Fishman II and III than Fishman I, who had higher qAF and TF than healthy eyes. Patients carrying the G1916E mutation had lower qAF and TF than most other patients, even in the presence of a second allele associated with severe disease. CONCLUSIONS: Quantified fundus autofluorescence is an indirect approach to measuring RPE lipofuscin in vivo. We report that ABCA4 mutations cause significantly elevated qAF, consistent with previous reports indicating that increased RPE lipofuscin is a hallmark of STGD1. Even when qualitative differences in fundus AF images are not evident, qAF can elucidate phenotypic variation. Quantified fundus autofluorescence will serve to establish genotype-phenotype correlations and as an outcome measure in clinical trials.
Authors: Jens Reinhard; André Messias; Klaus Dietz; Manfred Mackeben; Raimund Lakmann; Hendrik P N Scholl; Eckart Apfelstedt-Sylla; Bernhard H F Weber; Mathias W Seeliger; Eberhart Zrenner; Susanne Trauzettel-Klosinski Journal: Vision Res Date: 2007-06-11 Impact factor: 1.886
Authors: Artur V Cideciyan; Malgorzata Swider; Tomas S Aleman; Alexander Sumaroka; Sharon B Schwartz; Marisa I Roman; Ann H Milam; Jean Bennett; Edwin M Stone; Samuel G Jacobson Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Artur V Cideciyan; Samuel G Jacobson; Tomas S Aleman; Danian Gu; Susan E Pearce-Kelling; Alexander Sumaroka; Gregory M Acland; Gustavo D Aguirre Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-03-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jessica I W Morgan; Jennifer J Hunter; Benjamin Masella; Robert Wolfe; Daniel C Gray; William H Merigan; François C Delori; David R Williams Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2008-04-11 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Artur V Cideciyan; Malgorzata Swider; Tomas S Aleman; Marisa I Roman; Alexander Sumaroka; Sharon B Schwartz; Edwin M Stone; Samuel G Jacobson Journal: J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: Ambarish S Pawar; Nasser M Qtaishat; Deborah M Little; David R Pepperberg Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2008-02-08 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Andre Messias; Jens Reinhard; Antonio Augusto Velasco e Cruz; Klaus Dietz; Manfred MacKeben; Susanne Trauzettel-Klosinski Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Tobias Duncker; Gregory E Stein; Winston Lee; Stephen H Tsang; Jana Zernant; Srilaxmi Bearelly; Donald C Hood; Vivienne C Greenstein; François C Delori; Rando Allikmets; Janet R Sparrow Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Thomas Ach; Elen Tolstik; Jeffrey D Messinger; Anna V Zarubina; Rainer Heintzmann; Christine A Curcio Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Tobias Duncker; Marcela Marsiglia; Winston Lee; Jana Zernant; Stephen H Tsang; Rando Allikmets; Vivienne C Greenstein; Janet R Sparrow Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-10-23 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Janet R Sparrow; Tobias Duncker; Kaspar Schuerch; Maarjaliis Paavo; Jose Ronaldo Lima de Carvalho Journal: Prog Retin Eye Res Date: 2019-08-28 Impact factor: 21.198
Authors: Patrick Pallitto; Zsolt Ablonczy; E Ellen Jones; Richard R Drake; Yiannis Koutalos; Rosalie K Crouch; John Donello; Julia Herrmann Journal: Photochem Photobiol Sci Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 3.982