PURPOSE: The ABCR protein of the rod outer segment is thought to facilitate movement of the all-trans retinal photoproduct of rhodopsin bleaching out of the disc lumen. This study was undertaken to investigate the extent to which ABCR deficiency affects the post-bleach recovery of the rod photoresponse in ABCR-deficient (abcr-/-) mice. METHODS: Electroretinographic (ERG) a-wave responses were recorded from abcr-/- mice and two control strains. A bright probe flash was used to examine the course of rod recovery after fractional rhodopsin bleaches of approximately 10(-6), approximately 3 x 10(-5), approximately 0.03, and approximately 0.30 to approximately 0.40. RESULTS: Dark-adapted abcr-/- mice and control animals exhibited similar normalized near-peak amplitudes of the paired-flash-ERG-derived, weak-flash response. Response recovery after approximately 10(-6) bleaching exhibited an average exponential time constant of 319, 171, and 213 ms, respectively, in the abcr-/- and the two control strains. Recovery time constants determined for approximately 3 x 10(-5) bleaching did not differ significantly among strains. However, those determined for the approximately 0.03 bleach indicated significantly faster recovery in abcr-/- mice (2.34 +/- 0.74 minutes) than in the controls (5.36 +/- 2.20 and 5.92 +/- 2.44 minutes). After approximately 0.30 to approximately 0.40 bleaching, the initial recovery in the abcr-/- mice was, on average, faster than in control mice. CONCLUSIONS: By comparison with control animals, abcr-/- mice exhibit faster rod recovery after a bleach of approximately 0.03. The data suggest that ABCR in normal rods may directly or indirectly prolong all-trans retinal clearance from the disc lumen over a significant bleaching range, and that the essential function of ABCR may be to promote the clearance of residual amounts of all-trans retinal that remain in the discs long after bleaching.
PURPOSE: The ABCR protein of the rod outer segment is thought to facilitate movement of the all-trans retinal photoproduct of rhodopsin bleaching out of the disc lumen. This study was undertaken to investigate the extent to which ABCR deficiency affects the post-bleach recovery of the rod photoresponse in ABCR-deficient (abcr-/-) mice. METHODS: Electroretinographic (ERG) a-wave responses were recorded from abcr-/- mice and two control strains. A bright probe flash was used to examine the course of rod recovery after fractional rhodopsin bleaches of approximately 10(-6), approximately 3 x 10(-5), approximately 0.03, and approximately 0.30 to approximately 0.40. RESULTS: Dark-adapted abcr-/- mice and control animals exhibited similar normalized near-peak amplitudes of the paired-flash-ERG-derived, weak-flash response. Response recovery after approximately 10(-6) bleaching exhibited an average exponential time constant of 319, 171, and 213 ms, respectively, in the abcr-/- and the two control strains. Recovery time constants determined for approximately 3 x 10(-5) bleaching did not differ significantly among strains. However, those determined for the approximately 0.03 bleach indicated significantly faster recovery in abcr-/- mice (2.34 +/- 0.74 minutes) than in the controls (5.36 +/- 2.20 and 5.92 +/- 2.44 minutes). After approximately 0.30 to approximately 0.40 bleaching, the initial recovery in the abcr-/- mice was, on average, faster than in control mice. CONCLUSIONS: By comparison with control animals, abcr-/- mice exhibit faster rod recovery after a bleach of approximately 0.03. The data suggest that ABCR in normal rods may directly or indirectly prolong all-trans retinal clearance from the disc lumen over a significant bleaching range, and that the essential function of ABCR may be to promote the clearance of residual amounts of all-trans retinal that remain in the discs long after bleaching.
Authors: Jennifer J Kang Derwent; Deborah J Derlacki; John R Hetling; Gerald A Fishman; David G Birch; Sandeep Grover; Edwin M Stone; David R Pepperberg Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: So Ra Kim; Nathan Fishkin; Jian Kong; Koji Nakanishi; Rando Allikmets; Janet R Sparrow Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-07-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Arkady L Lyubarsky; Andrey B Savchenko; Sarah B Morocco; Lauren L Daniele; T Michael Redmond; Edward N Pugh Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2005-07-26 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Artur V Cideciyan; Tomas S Aleman; Malgorzata Swider; Sharon B Schwartz; Janet D Steinberg; Alexander J Brucker; Albert M Maguire; Jean Bennett; Edwin M Stone; Samuel G Jacobson Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2004-01-06 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Tomas R Burke; Tobias Duncker; Russell L Woods; Jonathan P Greenberg; Jana Zernant; Stephen H Tsang; R Theodore Smith; Rando Allikmets; Janet R Sparrow; François C Delori Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-05-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Alexander V Kolesnikov; Akiko Maeda; Peter H Tang; Yoshikazu Imanishi; Krzysztof Palczewski; Vladimir J Kefalov Journal: J Physiol Date: 2015-10-18 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Artur V Cideciyan; Malgorzata Swider; Tomas S Aleman; Yaroslav Tsybovsky; Sharon B Schwartz; Elizabeth A M Windsor; Alejandro J Roman; Alexander Sumaroka; Janet D Steinberg; Samuel G Jacobson; Edwin M Stone; Krzysztof Palczewski Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2008-12-12 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Peter Charbel Issa; Alun R Barnard; Mandeep S Singh; Emma Carter; Zhichun Jiang; Roxana A Radu; Ulrich Schraermeyer; Robert E MacLaren Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-08-19 Impact factor: 4.799