| Literature DB >> 24676148 |
Kang-Le Lu1, Wei-Na Xu1, Li-Na Wang1, Ding-Dong Zhang1, Chun-Nuan Zhang1, Wen-Bin Liu1.
Abstract
High-fat diets may promote growth, partly through their protein-sparing effects. However, high-fat diets often lead to excessive fat deposition, which may have a negative impact on fish such as poor growth and suppressive immune. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of a fat-rich diet on the mechanisms of fat deposition in the liver. Three-hundred blunt snout bream (Megalobrama amblycephala) juveniles (initial mass 18.00 ± 0.05 g) were fed with one of two diets (5% or 15% fat) for 8 weeks. β-Oxidation capacity and regulation of rate-limiting enzymes were assessed. Large fat droplets were present in hepatocytes of fish fed the high-fat diet. This observation is thought to be largely owing to the reduced capacity for mitochondrial and peroxisomal β-oxidation in the livers of fish fed the high-fat diet, as well as the decreased activities of carnitine palmitoyltransferase (CPT) I and acyl-CoA oxidase (ACO), which are enzymes involved in fatty-acid metabolism. Study of CPT I kinetics showed that CPT I had a low affinity for its substrates and a low catalytic efficiency in fish fed the high-fat diet. Expression of both CPT I and ACO was significantly down-regulated in fish fed the high-fat diet. Moreover, the fatty-acid composition of the mitochondrial membrane varied between the two groups. In conclusion, the attenuated β-oxidation capacity observed in fish fed a high-fat diet is proposed to be owing to decreased activity and/or catalytic efficiency of the rate-limiting enzymes CPT I and ACO, via both genetic and non-genetic mechanisms.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24676148 PMCID: PMC3968065 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093135
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Formulation and proximate composition of the experimental diets.
| Ingredients (g/kg) | Diets | Proximate composition (g/kg) | Diets | ||
| Low-fat | High-fat | Low-fat | High-fat | ||
| Fish meal | 150 | 150 | Moisture | 98.0 | 97.0 |
| Casein | 150 | 150 | Crude protein | 311 | 313 |
| Soybean meal | 200 | 200 | Crude lipid | 49.0 | 147 |
| Corn starch | 250 | 250 | Crude fiber | 138 | 41.0 |
| α-starch | 50.0 | 50.0 | Ash | 78.0 | 80.0 |
| Fish oil | 19.0 | 69.0 | Carbohydrate | 326 | 323 |
| Soybean oil | 19.0 | 69.0 | Energy | 14.9 | 18.8 |
| Cellulose | 104 | 4.00 | |||
| Calcium biphosphate | 18.0 | 18.0 | |||
| Premix | 10.0 | 10.0 | |||
| Carboxymethyl cellulose | 30.0 | 30.0 | |||
Carbohydrate (nitrogen-free extract) was calculate by difference (1000-moisture - crude protein - crude lipid – ash - crude fiber).
Energy (ΚJ/g diet) = (%crude protein×23.6)+(%crude lipids×39.5)+ (%carbohydrates×17.3).
Premix supplied the following minerals (g/kg) and vitamins (IU or mg/kg): CuSO4·5H2O, 2.0g; FeSO4·7H2O, 25g; ZnSO4·7H2O, 22g; MnSO4·4H2O, 7 g; Na2SeO3, 0.04 g; KI, 0.026 g; CoCl2·6H2O, 0.1 g; Vitamin A, 900000IU; Vitamin D, 200000IU; Vitamin E, 4500 mg; Vitamin K3 , 220 mg; Vitamin B1, 320 mg; Vitamin B2, 1090 mg; Niacin, 2800 mg; Vitamin B5, 2000 mg; Vitamin B6, 500 mg; Vitamin B12, 1.6 mg; Vitamin C, 5000 mg; Pantothenate, 1000 mg; Folic acid, 165 mg; Choline, 60000 mg.
Fatty acid composition of fish oil, soybean oil and the diets.
| Fatty acids (%) | Fish oil | Soybean oil | Diets |
| C14:0 | 6.26 | 0.07 | 3.08 |
| C16:0 | 21.50 | 10.39 | 17.70 |
| C18:0 | 5.12 | 4.89 | 4.96 |
| C20:0 | 0.68 | 0.44 | 0.43 |
| ∑ SFA | 33.56 | 15.79 | 26.17 |
| C16:n-9 | 6.80 | 0.09 | 3.22 |
| C18:n-9 | 14.58 | 25.14 | 21.52 |
| C20:n-9 | 2.27 | 0.30 | 1.14 |
| ∑ MUFA | 23.65 | 25.53 | 25.87 |
| C18:2n-6 | 3.65 | 52.78 | 31.50 |
| C18:3n-3 | 2.69 | 5.42 | 3.84 |
| C20:5n-3 (EPA) | 9.77 | - | 3.81 |
| C22:5n-3 | 0.98 | - | 0.46 |
| C22:6n-3 (DHA) | 11.92 | - | 4.61 |
| ∑ PUFA | 29.01 | 58.2 | 44.21 |
Provided by Coland Feed Industry Co., Ltd (Wuhan, China).
The fatty acids composition of the two diets are similar.
Figure 1Transmission electron microscope images of blunt snout bream hepatocyte and mitochondrion ultrastructure: N (Nucleus), L (lipid droplet), M (mitochondrion).
Photomicrographs and main findings: (a) hepatocytes of fish fed low-fat diet with normal structure; (b) hepatocytes presenting extensive intracellular lipid droplets of fish fed high-fat diet; (c) hepatocytes of fish fed low-fat diet displaying dark and slender mitochondria; (d, e) mitochondria showing highly hydropic changes (↑, →) of fish fed high-fat diet. Bar = 1 μm.
Figure 2Parameters related to mitochondrial and peroxisomal β-oxidation in liver of blunt snout bream fed the experimental diets.
(A) Mitochondrial β-oxidation in liver homogenate or mitochondrial-fraction. (B) Peroxisomal β-oxidation in liver. (C) CPT I activity in mitochondrial-fraction. (D) Acyl-CoA oxidase (ACO) activity in liver homogenate. Mean values and standard error (±S.E.M.) are present for each parameter (n = 6). *, Significantly different from the fish fed control diet: P<0.05.
Kinetic analysis of CPT I in liver of blunt snout bream fed the experimental diets.
| Parameters | Low-fat | High-fat | |
| Vmax (nmolmin/mg/mt prot) | For Carnitine | 15.3±0.9 | 12.7±0.5* |
| For Palmitoyl-CoA | 14.7±0.7 | 12.1±0.6* | |
|
| For Carnitine (mM) | 1.69±0.07 | 2.76±0.10* |
| For Palmitoyl-CoA (μM) | 68.9±6.2 | 93.1±7.3* | |
| Catalytic efficiency | For Carnitine | 9.05±0.6 | 4.60±0.5* |
| For Palmitoyl-CoA | 0.22±0.03 | 0.14±0.02* | |
Mean values and standard error (±S.E.M.) are present for each parameter (n = 6).
*, Significantly different from the fish fed control diet: P<0.05.
Figure 3IC50:The concentration of malonyl-CoA (μM) to reduce the activity of CPT I by 50% (A); Malonyl-CoA (M-CoA) content in liver (B); Mean values and standard error (±S.E.M.) are present for each parameter (n = 6).
Figure 4Mitochondria status parameters in blunt snout bream fed the experimental diets.
(A) SDH activity in mitochondrial fraction. (B) Na+-K+-ATPase in mitochondrial fraction. (C) SOD activity in mitochondrial fraction. (D) MDA level in mitochondrial fraction. Mean values and standard error (±S.E.M.) are present for each parameter (n = 6). *, Significantly different from the fish fed control diet: P<0.05.
Fatty acid composition of mitochondrial membrane in liver of blunt snout bream fed the experimental diets.
| Fatty acids (%) | Mitochondrial membrane | |
| Low-fat | High-fat | |
| C14:0 | 0.72±0.05 | 0.75±0.02 |
| C16:0 | 17.1±0.39 | 16.7±0.16 |
| C18:0 | 13.5±0.26 | 13.2±0.27 |
| C20:0 | 0.18±0.01 | 0.20±0.02 |
| ∑ SFA | 31.5±0.62 | 30.8±0.44 |
| C16:n-9 | 1.82±0.03 | 1.39±0.03* |
| C18:n-9 | 15.1±0.20 | 14.1±0.21 |
| C20:n-9 | 0.54±0.02 | 0.55±0.01 |
| ∑ MUFA | 17.5±0.23 | 16.1±0.16 |
| C18:2n-6 | 11.0±0.29 | 12.1±0.14 |
| C18:3n-3 | 0.67±0.04 | 0.87±0.02* |
| C20:5n-3 (EPA) | 2.74±0.13 | 3.78±0.10* |
| C22:5n-3 | 1.21±0.05 | 1.44±0.10 |
| C22:6n-3 (DHA) | 21.8±0.62 | 26.2±0.05* |
| ∑ PUFA | 37.4±0.83 | 44.4±0.23* |
| ∑ n-3 | 26.4±0.70 | 32.3±0.24* |
| ∑ n-6 | 11.0±0.29 | 12.1±0.14 |
| ∑ VLCFA | 23.0±0.66 | 27.6±0.13* |
| n-3/n-6 | 2.39±0.07 | 2.66±0.04* |
Mean values and standard error (±S.E.M.) are present for each parameter (n = 6).
*, Significantly different from the fish fed control diet: P<0.05.
VLCFA: very long chain fatty acid.
Figure 5Relative gene expressions of lipid-related genes.
(A) Genes involved in mitochondrial and peroxisomal β-oxidation (CPT I, ACO, CPT II, FACS and ACAD). (B) Genes involved in gene regulation (PPARs), fatty acid uptake and transport (FATP and FABP) and uncoupling protein (UCP 2). Mean values and standard error (±S.E.M.) are present for each parameter (n = 6). The values of the expression of the target genes are presented as relative to value of low-fat group (set to 1). Data were normalized by β-actin. *, Significantly different from the fish fed control diet: P<0.05. PPAR: peroxisome proliferatoractivated receptor; ACO: acyl-CoA oxidase; ACAD: acyl-CoA dehydrogenase; CPT I, II: carnitine palmitoyltransferase I, II; FACS: fatty acyl-CoA synthetase; FATP: fatty acid transport protein; FABP: fatty acid binding protein; UCP 2: uncoupling protein 2.