Literature DB >> 24673690

Technical and biological complications of single-molar implant restorations.

Sven Rinke1, Matthias Roediger2, Peter Eickholz3, Katharina Lange4, Dirk Ziebolz5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Retrospective evaluation of the biological and technical complications in implant-supported single-tooth molar restorations performed in a private practice after functional periods of ≥4 years.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-five patients (34 females, age 51.7 ± 10.6 years) with 112 implants received annual follow-up examinations and participated in a maintenance program. The survival (in situ) and success (complication-free) rates of implants and superstructures were evaluated. Time-dependent peri-implantitis rates were calculated, and the influencing factors were identified using a multiple Cox regression.
RESULTS: The implant survival rate was 100%. Three of 112 crowns required replacement (prosthetic survival rate = 98.1%). Thirty technical complications were observed: loss of retention (16), ceramic fracture (10), and screw loosening (4). The success rate of the superstructures was 79.0% after 7 years. Overall, 9.2% of the patients developed peri-implantitis (probing depth ≥5 mm, BOP, suppuration, bone loss ≥3.5 mm); (smokers: 41.6%, non-smokers: 1.8%). After 7 years, the time-dependent implant success rate (free of peri-implantitis) was 100% for non-smokers and 58.6% for smokers. Multiple analysis showed a significant effect of smoking (hazard ratio, 19.5; P = 0.008) on peri-implantitis.
CONCLUSIONS: Implants with cemented single-tooth restorations in the molar region constitute a reliable treatment in private practice. Smokers have a significantly increased peri-implantitis rate.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cement; ceramics; clinical studies; dental implant(s); peri-implant infections(s); tobacco

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24673690     DOI: 10.1111/clr.12382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  7 in total

1.  What is the prevalence of peri-implantitis? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pedro Diaz; Esther Gonzalo; Luis J Gil Villagra; Barbara Miegimolle; Maria J Suarez
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 3.747

Review 2.  How frequent does peri-implantitis occur? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mia Rakic; Pablo Galindo-Moreno; Alberto Monje; Sandro Radovanovic; Hom-Lay Wang; David Cochran; Anton Sculean; Luigi Canullo
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Effect of loading frequency on cyclic fatigue lifetime of a standard-diameter implant with an internal abutment connection.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Duan; Jason A Griggs
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 4.  Erythritol-Enriched Air-Polishing Powder for the Surgical Treatment of Peri-Implantitis.

Authors:  Silvio Taschieri; Roberto Weinstein; Massimo Del Fabbro; Stefano Corbella
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-05-06

5.  Effect of Abutment Geometry and Luting Agents on the Vertical Marginal Discrepancy of Cast Copings on Implant Abutments: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Jose Rosas; Frank Mayta-Tovalino; Violeta Malpartida-Carrillo; Arnaldo Munive Degregori; Roman Mendoza; Maria E Guerrero
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-06-21

6.  Implant-supported overdentures with different bar designs: A retrospective evaluation after 5-19 years of clinical function.

Authors:  Sven Rinke; Hajo Rasing; Nikolaus Gersdorff; Ralf Buergers; Matthias Roediger
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.904

7.  A Single-Center Study of a Resin Inlay Dental Implant-Fixed Prosthesis for Closing Proximal Contact Loss in 89 Patients Who Underwent 3-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Qiyue Chen; Yong Shi; Zhaoqiang Zhang; Guangbao Song
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2021-10-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.