Literature DB >> 24670844

Comparative effectiveness of sphincter-sparing surgery versus abdominoperineal resection in rectal cancer: patient-reported outcomes in National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project randomized trial R-04.

Marcia M Russell1, Patricia A Ganz, Samia Lopa, Greg Yothers, Clifford Y Ko, Amit Arora, James N Atkins, Nathan Bahary, Gamini S Soori, John M Robertson, Janice Eakle, Benjamin T Marchello, Timothy F Wozniak, Robert W Beart, Norman Wolmark.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) R-04 was a randomized controlled trial of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with resectable stage II-III rectal cancer. We hypothesized that patients who underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR) would have a poorer quality of life than those who underwent sphincter-sparing surgery (SSS).
METHODS: To obtain patient-reported outcomes (PROs) we administered two symptom scales at baseline and 1 year postoperatively: the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) and the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer module for patients with Colorectal Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-CR38). Scoring was stratified by nonrandomly assigned definitive surgery (APR vs SSS). Analyses controlled for baseline scores and stratification factors: age, sex, stage, intended surgery, and randomly assigned chemoradiotherapy.
RESULTS: Of 1,608 randomly assigned patients, 987 had data for planned analyses; 62% underwent SSS; 38% underwent APR. FACT-C total and subscale scores were not statistically different by surgery at 1 year. For the EORTC QLQ-CR38 functional scales, APR patients reported worse body image (70.3 vs 77.0, P = 0.0005) at 1 year than did SSS patients. Males undergoing APR reported worse sexual enjoyment (43.7 vs 54.7, P = 0.02) at 1 year than did those undergoing SSS. For the EORTC QLQ-CR38 symptom scale scores, APR patients reported worse micturition symptoms than the SSS group at 1 year (26.9 vs 21.5, P = 0.03). SSS patients reported worse gastrointestinal tract symptoms than did the APR patients (18.9 vs 15.2, P < 0.0001), as well as weight loss (10.1 vs 6.0, P = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms and functional problems were detected at 1 year by EORTC QLQ-CR38, reflecting different symptom profiles in patients who underwent APR than those who underwent SSS. Information from these PROs may be useful in counseling patients anticipating surgery for rectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24670844      PMCID: PMC4379325          DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  9 in total

1.  The construction and testing of the EORTC colorectal cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38). European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study Group on Quality of Life.

Authors:  M A Sprangers; A te Velde; N K Aaronson
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Comparative quality of life in patients following abdominoperineal excision and low anterior resection for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  P How; S Stelzner; G Branagan; K Bundy; K Chandrakumaran; R J Heald; B Moran
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  A five-year prospective study of quality of life after colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne K Chambers; Xingqiong Meng; Pip Youl; Joanne Aitken; Jeff Dunn; Peter Baade
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Quality of life after rectal resection for cancer, with or without permanent colostomy.

Authors:  J Pachler; P Wille-Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-04-18

5.  Patient-reported outcomes after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a multicenter prospective observational study.

Authors:  Salvatore Pucciarelli; Paola Del Bianco; Fabio Efficace; Samantha Serpentini; Carlo Capirci; Antonino De Paoli; Antonio Amato; Dajana Cuicchi; Donato Nitti
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) quality of life instrument.

Authors:  W L Ward; E A Hahn; F Mo; L Hernandez; D S Tulsky; D Cella
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Long-term quality of life and sexual and urinary function after abdominoperineal resection for distal rectal cancer.

Authors:  Michael S Kasparek; Imran Hassan; Robert R Cima; Dirk R Larson; Rachel E Gullerud; Bruce G Wolff
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Cancer statistics, 2013.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Deepa Naishadham; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Sphincter-sparing surgery after preoperative radiotherapy for low rectal cancers: feasibility, oncologic results and quality of life outcomes.

Authors:  A S Allal; S Bieri; A Pelloni; V Spataro; S Anchisi; P Ambrosetti; M A Sprangers; J M Kurtz; P Gertsch
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total
  23 in total

Review 1.  Complete radiotherapy response in rectal cancer: A review of the evidence.

Authors:  Daniel G Couch; David M Hemingway
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Surveillance after neoadjuvant therapy in advanced rectal cancer with complete clinical response can have comparable outcomes to total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  Radhika K Smith; Robert D Fry; Najjia N Mahmoud; E Carter Paulson
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Impact of Length of Distal Margin on Outcomes Following Sphincter Preserving Surgery for Middle and Lower Third Rectal Cancers.

Authors:  Rahul Bhamre; Abhishek Mitra; Anup Tamankar; Ashwin Desouza; Avanish Saklani
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-02-09

Review 4.  Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Cancer in the Twenty-First Century: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Alexander T Hawkins; Katherine Albutt; Paul E Wise; Karim Alavi; Ranjan Sudan; Andreas M Kaiser; Liliana Bordeianou
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  The health-related quality of life journey of gynecologic oncology surgical patients: Implications for the incorporation of patient-reported outcomes into surgical quality metrics.

Authors:  Kemi M Doll; Emma L Barber; Jeannette T Bensen; Anna C Snavely; Paola A Gehrig
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  The impact of surgical complications on health-related quality of life in women undergoing gynecologic and gynecologic oncology procedures: a prospective longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Kemi M Doll; Emma L Barber; Jeannette T Bensen; Matthew C Revilla; Anna C Snavely; Antonia V Bennett; Bryce B Reeve; Paola A Gehrig
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 7.  Conversations for providers caring for patients with rectal cancer: Comparison of long-term patient-centered outcomes for patients with low rectal cancer facing ostomy or sphincter-sparing surgery.

Authors:  Lisa J Herrinton; Andrea Altschuler; Carmit K McMullen; Joanna E Bulkley; Mark C Hornbrook; Virginia Sun; Christopher S Wendel; Marcia Grant; Carol M Baldwin; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Larissa K F Temple; Robert S Krouse
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Anorectal Function and Quality of Life in Patients With Early Stage Rectal Cancer Treated With Chemoradiation and Local Excision.

Authors:  Patricio B Lynn; Lindsay A Renfro; Xiomara W Carrero; Qian Shi; Paul L Strombom; Oliver Chow; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Quality of Life After Radiotherapy for Rectal and Anal Cancer.

Authors:  Shane S Neibart; Sharon L Manne; Salma K Jabbour
Journal:  Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep       Date:  2020-01-16

10.  Quality of life after sphincter preservation surgery or abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer (ASPIRE): A long-term prospective, multicentre, cohort study.

Authors:  Sung-Bum Kang; Jung Rae Cho; Seung-Yong Jeong; Jae Hwan Oh; Soyeon Ahn; Sunkyu Choi; Duck-Woo Kim; Bong Hwa Lee; Eui Gon Youk; Sung Chan Park; Seung Chul Heo; Doo-Seok Lee; Seung-Bum Ryoo; Ji Won Park; Hyoung-Chul Park; Sung-Min Lee; Sung Il Kang; Min Hyun Kim; Heung-Kwon Oh; Rumi Shin; Min Jung Kim; Kyoung Ho Lee; Young-Hoon Kim; Jae-Sung Kim; Keun-Wook Lee; Hye Seung Lee; Hyun Jung Kim; Young Soo Park; Dae Kyung Sohn; Kyu Joo Park
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health West Pac       Date:  2020-12-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.