Literature DB >> 21135694

Patient-reported outcomes after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a multicenter prospective observational study.

Salvatore Pucciarelli1, Paola Del Bianco, Fabio Efficace, Samantha Serpentini, Carlo Capirci, Antonino De Paoli, Antonio Amato, Dajana Cuicchi, Donato Nitti.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively describe patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (pCRT) for rectal cancer.
BACKGROUND: Little evidence is available on PROs after pCRT for rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with rectal cancer, candidates to receive pCRT, were enrolled in a multicenter prospective observational trial. Health-related quality of life was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and its colorectal cancer module (QLQ-CR38), and fecal incontinence and bowel function were evaluated using the fecal incontinence score questionnaire and a set of ad hoc questions. Questionnaires were filled out before CRT (t₀), 2 to 3 weeks after completion of CRT (t₁), and at 6 (t₂) and 12 months (t₃) after surgery. Primary analysis of selected scales included: global quality of life, physical functioning, social functioning, fatigue, body image, future prospective, and gender-related sexual problems.
RESULTS: Of 149 eligible patients, questionnaires were completed in 100%, 95%, 88% and 77% of cases at t0, t₁, t₂, and t₃, respectively. At t₃, 78% of patients reported stool fractionation and 72% sensation of incomplete defecation. Only 14% of patients had optimal continence. Physical/social functioning, fatigue, and body image showed a decrease just after pCRT and returned to baseline levels at 1 year after treatment. Global quality of life was stable over time. Male sexual problems were greatly impaired throughout the study period (P < 0.001) with major clinically meaningful changes between baseline and 1 year after treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings add to the body of evidence available regarding pCRT and help clinicians to make more informed treatment decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21135694     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181fcb856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  34 in total

1.  Erectile and urinary function in men with rectal cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone: a randomized trial report.

Authors:  Meijin Huang; Jinxin Lin; Xihu Yu; Shen Chen; Liang Kang; Yanhong Deng; Jian Zheng; Yanxin Luo; Lei Wang; Ping Lan; Jianping Wang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Body image and sexual function in women after treatment for anal and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Catherine Benedict; Errol J Philip; Raymond E Baser; Jeanne Carter; Tammy A Schuler; Lina Jandorf; Katherine DuHamel; Christian Nelson
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Rectal sparing approach after preoperative radio- and/or chemotherapy (RESARCH) in patients with rectal cancer: a multicentre observational study.

Authors:  A Barina; A De Paoli; P Delrio; M Guerrieri; A Muratore; F Bianco; D Vespa; C Asteria; E Morpurgo; A Restivo; C Coco; U Pace; C Belluco; C Aschele; S Lonardi; V Valentini; G Mantello; I Maretto; P Del Bianco; A Perin; S Pucciarelli
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Changes in fatigue in rectal cancer patients before and after therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chang Wen-Pei; Jen Hsiu-Ju
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Comparative effectiveness of sphincter-sparing surgery versus abdominoperineal resection in rectal cancer: patient-reported outcomes in National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project randomized trial R-04.

Authors:  Marcia M Russell; Patricia A Ganz; Samia Lopa; Greg Yothers; Clifford Y Ko; Amit Arora; James N Atkins; Nathan Bahary; Gamini S Soori; John M Robertson; Janice Eakle; Benjamin T Marchello; Timothy F Wozniak; Robert W Beart; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Organ Preservation in Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan B Yuval; Hannah M Thompson; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Local excision in rectal cancer patients with major or complete clinical response after neoadjuvant therapy: a case-matched study.

Authors:  M Bushati; S Pucciarelli; N Gennaro; I Maretto; P Toppan; A Perin; E D L Urso; A Bagatella; G Spolverato
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Quantifying fatigue in (long-term) colorectal cancer survivors: a study from the population-based patient reported outcomes following initial treatment and long term evaluation of survivorship registry.

Authors:  Melissa S Y Thong; Floortje Mols; Xin S Wang; Valery E P P Lemmens; Tineke J Smilde; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Patient-Reported Outcomes vs. Clinician Symptom Reporting During Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Libertad T Flores; Antonia V Bennett; Ethel B Law; Carla Hajj; Mindy P Griffith; Karyn A Goodman
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2012-07

10.  Tools for fecal incontinence assessment: lessons for inflammatory bowel disease trials based on a systematic review.

Authors:  Ferdinando D'Amico; Steven D Wexner; Carolynne J Vaizey; Célia Gouynou; Silvio Danese; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.