Chandrashekhar T Sreeramareddy1, Zhi Zhen Qin2, Srinath Satyanarayana2, Ramnath Subbaraman3, Madhukar Pai2. 1. Department of Population Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University Tunku Abdul Rahman, Bandar Sungai Long, 43000, Selangor, Malaysia. 2. McGill University & McGill International TB Centre, Dept of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, 1020 Pine Ave West, Montreal, QC H3A 1A2, Canada. 3. Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review Indian literature on delays in tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: We searched multiple sources for studies on delays in patients with pulmonary TB and those with chest symptoms. Studies were included if numeric data on any delay were reported. Patient delay was defined as the interval between onset of symptoms and the patient's first contact with a health care provider. Diagnostic delay was defined as the interval between the first consultation with a health care provider and diagnosis. Treatment delay was defined as the interval between diagnosis and initiation of anti-tuberculosis treatment. Total delay was defined as time interval from the onset of symptoms until treatment initiation. RESULTS: Among 541 potential citations identified, 23 studies met the inclusion criteria. Included studies used a variety of definitions for onset of symptoms and delays. Median estimates of patient, diagnostic and treatment delay were respectively 18.4 (IQR 14.3-27.0), 31.0 (IQR 24.5-35.4) and 2.5 days (IQR 1.9-3.6) for patients with TB and those with chest symptoms combined. The median total delay was 55.3 days (IQR 46.5-61.5). About 48% of all patients first consulted private providers; an average of 2.7 health care providers were consulted before diagnosis. Number and type of provider first consulted were the most important risk factors for delay. CONCLUSIONS: These findings underscore the need to develop novel strategies for reducing patient and diagnostic delays and engaging first-contact health care providers.
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review Indian literature on delays in tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: We searched multiple sources for studies on delays in patients with pulmonary TB and those with chest symptoms. Studies were included if numeric data on any delay were reported. Patient delay was defined as the interval between onset of symptoms and the patient's first contact with a health care provider. Diagnostic delay was defined as the interval between the first consultation with a health care provider and diagnosis. Treatment delay was defined as the interval between diagnosis and initiation of anti-tuberculosis treatment. Total delay was defined as time interval from the onset of symptoms until treatment initiation. RESULTS: Among 541 potential citations identified, 23 studies met the inclusion criteria. Included studies used a variety of definitions for onset of symptoms and delays. Median estimates of patient, diagnostic and treatment delay were respectively 18.4 (IQR 14.3-27.0), 31.0 (IQR 24.5-35.4) and 2.5 days (IQR 1.9-3.6) for patients with TB and those with chest symptoms combined. The median total delay was 55.3 days (IQR 46.5-61.5). About 48% of all patients first consulted private providers; an average of 2.7 health care providers were consulted before diagnosis. Number and type of provider first consulted were the most important risk factors for delay. CONCLUSIONS: These findings underscore the need to develop novel strategies for reducing patient and diagnostic delays and engaging first-contact health care providers.
Authors: Anagha Pradhan; Karina Kielmann; Himanshu Gupte; Arun Bamne; John D H Porter; Sheela Rangan Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-05-20 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Penny F Whiting; Anne W S Rutjes; Marie E Westwood; Susan Mallett; Jonathan J Deeks; Johannes B Reitsma; Mariska M G Leeflang; Jonathan A C Sterne; Patrick M M Bossuyt Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2011-10-18 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Sabine Bélard; Jonathan Remppis; Sanne Bootsma; Saskia Janssen; Davy U Kombila; Justin O Beyeme; Elie G Rossatanga; Cosme Kokou; Kara K Osbak; Régis M Obiang Mba; Harry M Kaba; Afsatou N Traoré; Jonas Ehrhardt; Emmanuel B Bache; Arnaud Flamen; Sabine Rüsch-Gerdes; Matthias Frank; Ayôla A Adegnika; Bertrand Lell; Stefan Niemann; Peter G Kremsner; Marguerite M Loembé; Abraham S Alabi; Martin P Grobusch Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2016-06-27 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Leonardo Martinez; Lin Xu; Cheng Chen; Juliet N Sekandi; Yongzhong Zhu; Changsheng Zhang; Christopher C Whalen; Limei Zhu Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2017-02-13 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: B M Prasad; S Satyanarayana; S S Chadha; A Das; B Thapa; S Mohanty; S Pandurangan; E R Babu; J Tonsing; K S Sachdeva Journal: Public Health Action Date: 2016-01-25
Authors: Rebecca L Walcott; Justin B Ingels; Phaedra S Corso; Sarah Zalwango; Christopher C Whalen; Juliet N Sekandi Journal: Glob Public Health Date: 2020-02-06
Authors: Wadah Ibrahim; Liesl Carr; Rebecca Cordell; Michael J Wilde; Dahlia Salman; Paul S Monks; Paul Thomas; Chris E Brightling; Salman Siddiqui; Neil J Greening Journal: Thorax Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 9.139