Literature DB >> 24668611

Calibration plots for risk prediction models in the presence of competing risks.

Thomas A Gerds1, Per K Andersen, Michael W Kattan.   

Abstract

A predicted risk of 17% can be called reliable if it can be expected that the event will occur to about 17 of 100 patients who all received a predicted risk of 17%. Statistical models can predict the absolute risk of an event such as cardiovascular death in the presence of competing risks such as death due to other causes. For personalized medicine and patient counseling, it is necessary to check that the model is calibrated in the sense that it provides reliable predictions for all subjects. There are three often encountered practical problems when the aim is to display or test if a risk prediction model is well calibrated. The first is lack of independent validation data, the second is right censoring, and the third is that when the risk scale is continuous, the estimation problem is as difficult as density estimation. To deal with these problems, we propose to estimate calibration curves for competing risks models based on jackknife pseudo-values that are combined with a nearest neighborhood smoother and a cross-validation approach to deal with all three problems.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  calibration plots; competing risks; kernel smoothing; pseudo-values; risk models

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24668611     DOI: 10.1002/sim.6152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  22 in total

1.  Deep learning for cardiovascular medicine: a practical primer.

Authors:  Chayakrit Krittanawong; Kipp W Johnson; Robert S Rosenson; Zhen Wang; Mehmet Aydar; Usman Baber; James K Min; W H Wilson Tang; Jonathan L Halperin; Sanjiv M Narayan
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Overview of model validation for survival regression model with competing risks using melanoma study data.

Authors:  Zhongheng Zhang; Giuliana Cortese; Christophe Combescure; Roger Marshall; Minjung Lee; Hyun Ja Lim; Bernhard Haller
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-08

Review 3.  The Wally plot approach to assess the calibration of clinical prediction models.

Authors:  Paul Blanche; Thomas A Gerds; Claus T Ekstrøm
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  Development and Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram to Guide Decision-Making for High-Grade Digestive Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

Authors:  Zhenyu Lin; Haihong Wang; Yixuan Zhang; Guiling Li; Guoliang Pi; Xianjun Yu; Yaobing Chen; Kaizhou Jin; Liangkai Chen; Shengli Yang; Ying Zhu; Gang Wu; Jie Chen; Tao Zhang
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-11-29

5.  Improving Outcome Predictions for Patients Receiving Mechanical Circulatory Support by Optimizing Imputation of Missing Values.

Authors:  Byron C Jaeger; Ryan Cantor; Venkata Sthanam; Rongbing Xie; James K Kirklin; Ramaraju Rudraraju
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2021-09-14

6.  Prediction of first cardiovascular disease event in 2.9 million individuals using Danish administrative healthcare data: a nationwide, registry-based derivation and validation study.

Authors:  Daniel Mølager Christensen; Matthew Phelps; Thomas Gerds; Morten Malmborg; Anne-Marie Schjerning; Jarl Emanuel Strange; Mohamad El-Chouli; Lars Bruun Larsen; Emil Fosbøl; Lars Køber; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Suneela Mehta; Rod Jackson; Gunnar Gislason
Journal:  Eur Heart J Open       Date:  2021-08-02

7.  Development and Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram to Guide Decision-Making for High-Grade Digestive Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

Authors:  Zhenyu Lin; Haihong Wang; Yixuan Zhang; Guiling Li; Guoliang Pi; Xianjun Yu; Yaobing Chen; Kaizhou Jin; Liangkai Chen; Shengli Yang; Ying Zhu; Gang Wu; Jie Chen; Tao Zhang
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-11-29

8.  Lessons learnt when accounting for competing events in the external validation of time-to-event prognostic models.

Authors:  Chava L Ramspek; Lucy Teece; Kym I E Snell; Marie Evans; Richard D Riley; Maarten van Smeden; Nan van Geloven; Merel van Diepen
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 9.685

9.  Development and Validation of a Clinical Prediction Tool for Seasonal Influenza Vaccination in England.

Authors:  Matthew M Loiacono; Nicholas Mitsakakis; Jeffrey C Kwong; Gabriela B Gomez; Ayman Chit; Paul Grootendorst
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-06-01

10.  Establishment of predictive model for patients with kidney cancer bone metastasis: a study based on SEER database.

Authors:  Kun-Chi Hua; Yong-Cheng Hu
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.