Literature DB >> 24668279

Incapacitation recovery times from a conductive electrical weapon exposure.

John C Criscione1, Mark W Kroll.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Law enforcement officers expect that a TASER(®) CEW (Conducted Electrical Weapon) broad-spread probe exposure will temporarily incapacitate a subject who will then be able to immediately (~1 s delay) recover motor control in order to comply with commands. However, this recovery time has not been previously reported.
METHODS: A total of 32 police academy students were exposed to a very broad-spread 5 s CEW stimulus as part of their training and told to depress a push-button as soon as they sensed the stimulus. A subgroup also depressed the push-button after being alerted by an audio stimulus.
RESULTS: The response time after the audio trigger was 1.05 ± 0.25 s; the median was 1.04 s (range 0.69-1.34 s). For the paired CEW triggered group the mean response time was 1.41 ± 0.61 s with a median of 1.06 s (range 0.92-2.18 s), which was not statistically different. Only 2/32 subjects were able to depress the button during the CEW exposure and with delays of 3.09 and 4.70 s from the start. Of the remaining 30 subjects the mean response time to execute the task (once the CEW exposure ended) was 1.27 ± 0.58 s with a median of 1.19 s (range 0.31-2.99 s) (NS vs. the audio trigger).
CONCLUSIONS: With a very-broad electrode spread, a CEW exposure could prevent or delay some purposeful movements. Normal reaction times appear to return immediately (~1 s) after the CEW exposure ceases.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24668279     DOI: 10.1007/s12024-014-9551-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol        ISSN: 1547-769X            Impact factor:   2.007


  14 in total

1.  Human cardiovascular effects of a new generation conducted electrical weapon.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Ho; Donald M Dawes; Robert F Reardon; Seth R Strote; Sebastian N Kunz; Rebecca S Nelson; Erik J Lundin; Benjamin S Orozco; James R Miner
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Twelve-lead electrocardiogram monitoring of subjects before and after voluntary exposure to the Taser X26.

Authors:  Gary M Vilke; Christian Sloane; Saul Levine; Tom Neuman; Edward Castillo; Theodore C Chan
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.469

3.  Serum troponin I measurement of subjects exposed to the Taser X-26.

Authors:  Christian M Sloane; Theodore C Chan; Saul D Levine; James V Dunford; Tom Neuman; Gary M Vilke
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 1.484

4.  Dosimetry considerations for electrical stun devices.

Authors:  J Patrick Reilly; Alan M Diamant; James Comeaux
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Conducted electrical weapon incapacitation during a goal-directed task as a function of probe spread.

Authors:  Jeffrey Ho; Donald Dawes; James Miner; Sebastian Kunz; Rebecca Nelson; James Sweeney
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 2.007

6.  The neurocognitive effects of simulated use-of-force scenarios.

Authors:  Donald M Dawes; Jeffrey D Ho; Andrea S Vincent; Paul C Nystrom; Johanna C Moore; Lila W Steinberg; Anne Marie K Tilton; Michael A Brave; Marc S Berris; James R Miner
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 2.007

7.  The effect of less-lethal weapons on injuries in police use-of-force events.

Authors:  John M MacDonald; Robert J Kaminski; Michael R Smith
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Physiological effects of a conducted electrical weapon on human subjects.

Authors:  Gary M Vilke; Christian M Sloane; Katie D Bouton; Fred W Kolkhorst; Saul D Levine; Tom S Neuman; Edward M Castillo; Theodore C Chan
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 5.721

9.  15-Second conducted electrical weapon exposure does not cause core temperature elevation in non-environmentally stressed resting adults.

Authors:  Donald M Dawes; Jeffrey D Ho; Mark A Johnson; Erik Lundin; Timothy A Janchar; James R Miner
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  Physiologic effects of a new-generation conducted electrical weapon on human volunteers.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Ho; Donald M Dawes; Richard J Chang; Rebecca S Nelson; James R Miner
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 1.484

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  TASER® conducted electrical weapons: misconceptions in the scientific/medical and other literature.

Authors:  James R Jauchem
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 2.007

2.  Police shootings after electrical weapon seizure: homicide or suicide-by-cop.

Authors:  Mark W Kroll; Darrell L Ross; Michael A Brave; Howard E Williams
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 2.686

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.