Literature DB >> 19846686

The effect of less-lethal weapons on injuries in police use-of-force events.

John M MacDonald1, Robert J Kaminski, Michael R Smith.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the effect of the use of less-lethal weapons, conductive energy devices (CEDs), and oleoresin capsicum (OC) spray on the prevalence and incidence of injuries to police officers and civilians in encounters involving the use of force.
METHODS: We analyzed data from 12 police departments that documented injuries to officers and civilians in 24,380 cases. We examined monthly injury rates for 2 police departments before and after their adoption of CEDs.
RESULTS: Odds of injury to civilians and officers were significantly lower when police used CED weapons, after control for differences in case attributes and departmental policies restricting use of these weapons. Monthly incidence of injury in 2 police departments declined significantly, by 25% to 62%, after adoption of CED devices.
CONCLUSIONS: Injuries sustained during police use-of-force events affect thousands of police officers and civilians in the United States each year. Incidence of these injuries can be reduced dramatically when law enforcement agencies responsibly employ less-lethal weapons in lieu of physical force.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19846686      PMCID: PMC2775771          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.159616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  9 in total

1.  Serum troponin I measurement of subjects exposed to the Taser X-26.

Authors:  Christian M Sloane; Theodore C Chan; Saul D Levine; James V Dunford; Tom Neuman; Gary M Vilke
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 1.484

2.  Electronic control devices.

Authors:  Mark W Kroll; Hugh Calkins; Richard M Luceri; Michael A Graham; William G Heegaard
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Taser safety remains unclear.

Authors:  Jared Strote; H Range Hutson
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.721

4.  The relative risk of police use-of-force options: evaluating the potential for deployment of electronic weaponry.

Authors:  Emma Jenkinson; Clare Neeson; Anthony Bleetman
Journal:  J Clin Forensic Med       Date:  2006-01-25

5.  Physiological effects of a conducted electrical weapon on human subjects.

Authors:  Gary M Vilke; Christian M Sloane; Katie D Bouton; Fred W Kolkhorst; Saul D Levine; Tom S Neuman; Edward M Castillo; Theodore C Chan
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 5.721

6.  15-Second conducted electrical weapon exposure does not cause core temperature elevation in non-environmentally stressed resting adults.

Authors:  Donald M Dawes; Jeffrey D Ho; Mark A Johnson; Erik Lundin; Timothy A Janchar; James R Miner
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Respiratory effect of prolonged electrical weapon application on human volunteers.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Ho; Donald M Dawes; Laura L Bultman; Jenny L Thacker; Lisa D Skinner; Jennifer M Bahr; Mark A Johnson; James R Miner
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2007-02-05       Impact factor: 3.451

8.  Cardiovascular and physiologic effects of conducted electrical weapon discharge in resting adults.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Ho; James R Miner; Dhanunjaya R Lakireddy; Laura L Bultman; William G Heegaard
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 3.451

9.  Cardiac monitoring of human subjects exposed to the taser.

Authors:  Saul D Levine; Christian M Sloane; Theodore C Chan; James V Dunford; Gary M Vilke
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 1.484

  9 in total
  11 in total

1.  TASER electronic control devices and eye injuries.

Authors:  Mark W Kroll; Donald M Dawes; William G Heegaard
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  The cardiovascular, respiratory, and metabolic effects of a long duration electronic control device exposure in human volunteers.

Authors:  Donald M Dawes; Jeffrey D Ho; Robert F Reardon; James R Miner
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 2.007

3.  Incapacitation recovery times from a conductive electrical weapon exposure.

Authors:  John C Criscione; Mark W Kroll
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 2.007

Review 4.  Adrenergic and metabolic effects of electrical weapons: review and meta-analysis of human data.

Authors:  S N Kunz; H G Calkins; J Adamec; M W Kroll
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Risk factors associated with legal interventions.

Authors:  Alfreda Holloway-Beth; Linda Forst; Julia Lippert; Sherry Brandt-Rauf; Sally Freels; Lee Friedman
Journal:  Inj Epidemiol       Date:  2016-01-15

6.  Pattern of rubber bullet injuries in the lower limbs: A report from Kashmir.

Authors:  Shabir Ahmed Dhar; Tahir-Ahmed Dar; Sharief-Ahmed Wani; Saheel Maajid; Jawed Ahmed Bhat; Naseer Ahmed Mir; Imtiyaz Hussain Dar; Shahid Hussain
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2016-06-01

Review 7.  Tear gas: an epidemiological and mechanistic reassessment.

Authors:  Craig Rothenberg; Satyanarayana Achanta; Erik R Svendsen; Sven-Eric Jordt
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Baby Shampoo to Relieve the Discomfort of Tear Gas and Pepper Spray Exposure: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jason P Stopyra; James E Winslow; James C Johnson; Keith D Hill; William P Bozeman
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-02-26

9.  Human Health Risks of Conducted Electrical Weapon Exposure: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Christos Baliatsas; Jenny Gerbecks; Michel L A Dückers; C Joris Yzermans
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-02-01

10.  The Injury Profile of an Australian Specialist Policing Unit.

Authors:  Brianna Larsen; Brad Aisbett; Aaron Silk
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.