Literature DB >> 24668269

Evaluation of a press-fit osteochondral poly(ester-urethane) scaffold in a rabbit defect model.

Iska Dresing1, Stephan Zeiter, Jörg Auer, Mauro Alini, David Eglin.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact on osteochondral healing of press-fitted multiphasic osteochondral scaffolds consisting of poly(ester-urethane) (PUR) and hydroxyapatite into a cylindric osteochondral defect in the distal non-weight bearing femoral trochlear ridge of the rabbit. Two scaffolds were investigated, one with and one without an intermediate microporous membrane between the cartilage and the bone compartment of the scaffold. A control group without a scaffold placed into the defect was included. After 12 weeks macroscopic and histomorphological analyses were performed. The scaffold was easily press-fitted and provided a stable matrix for tissue repair. The membrane did not demonstrate a detrimental effect on tissue healing compared with the scaffold without membrane. However, the control group had statistically superior healing as reflected by histological differences in the cartilage and subchondral bone compartment between control group and each scaffold group. A more detailed analysis revealed that the difference was localized in the bone compartment healing. The present study demonstrates that an elastomeric PUR scaffold can easily be press-fitted into an osteochondral defect and provides a stable matrix for tissue repair. However, the multi-phasic scaffold did not provide a clear advantage for tissue healing. Future investigations should refine especially the bone phase of the implant to increase its stiffness, biocompatibility and osteoconductive activity. A more precise fabrication technique would be necessary for the matching of tissue organisation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24668269     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-014-5192-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  39 in total

1.  Histological assessment of cartilage repair: a report by the Histology Endpoint Committee of the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS).

Authors:  Pierre Mainil-Varlet; Thomas Aigner; Mats Brittberg; Peter Bullough; Anthony Hollander; Ernst Hunziker; Rita Kandel; Stefan Nehrer; Kenneth Pritzker; Sally Roberts; Edouard Stauffer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Sliding motion modulates stiffness and friction coefficient at the surface of tissue engineered cartilage.

Authors:  S Grad; M Loparic; R Peter; M Stolz; U Aebi; M Alini
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 6.576

3.  A comparative study of articular cartilage thickness in the stifle of animal species used in human pre-clinical studies compared to articular cartilage thickness in the human knee.

Authors:  D D Frisbie; M W Cross; C W McIlwraith
Journal:  Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.358

4.  Fibrin-polyurethane composites for articular cartilage tissue engineering: a preliminary analysis.

Authors:  Cynthia R Lee; Sibylle Grad; Katarzyna Gorna; Sylwester Gogolewski; Andreas Goessl; Mauro Alini
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct

Review 5.  Histological evaluation of osteochondral defects: consideration of animal models with emphasis on the rabbit, experimental setup, follow-up and applied methods.

Authors:  Maximilian Rudert
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.481

Review 6.  Animal models for cartilage regeneration and repair.

Authors:  Constance R Chu; Michal Szczodry; Stephen Bruno
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 7.  Articular cartilage repair: basic science and clinical progress. A review of the current status and prospects.

Authors:  E B Hunziker
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.576

8.  Matrix generation within a macroporous non-degradable implant for osteochondral defects is not enhanced with partial enzymatic digestion of the surrounding tissue: evaluation in an in vivo rabbit model.

Authors:  Aaron J Krych; Florian Wanivenhaus; Kenneth W Ng; Stephen Doty; Russell F Warren; Suzanne A Maher
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 9.  Repair of articular cartilage defects: review and perspectives.

Authors:  Hongsen Chiang; Ching-Chuan Jiang
Journal:  J Formos Med Assoc       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Farnesol-modified biodegradable polyurethanes for cartilage tissue engineering.

Authors:  David Eglin; Sibylle Grad; Sylwester Gogolewski; Mauro Alini
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.396

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Scaffold-Based Tissue Engineering Strategies for Osteochondral Repair.

Authors:  Jiang-Nan Fu; Xing Wang; Meng Yang; You-Rong Chen; Ji-Ying Zhang; Rong-Hui Deng; Zi-Ning Zhang; Jia-Kuo Yu; Fu-Zhen Yuan
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-01-11

2.  Aspiration-assisted bioprinting of the osteochondral interface.

Authors:  Bugra Ayan; Yang Wu; Vengadeshprabhu Karuppagounder; Fadia Kamal; Ibrahim T Ozbolat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.