Literature DB >> 23846837

Matrix generation within a macroporous non-degradable implant for osteochondral defects is not enhanced with partial enzymatic digestion of the surrounding tissue: evaluation in an in vivo rabbit model.

Aaron J Krych1, Florian Wanivenhaus, Kenneth W Ng, Stephen Doty, Russell F Warren, Suzanne A Maher.   

Abstract

Articular cartilage defects are a significant source of pain, have limited ability to heal, and can lead to the development of osteoarthritis. However, a surgical solution is not available. To tackle this clinical problem, non-degradable implants capable of carrying mechanical load immediately after implantation and for the duration of implantation, while integrating with the host tissue, may be viable option. But integration between articular cartilage and non-degradable implants is not well studied. Our objective was to assess the in vivo performance of a novel macroporous, nondegradable, polyvinyl alcohol construct. We hypothesized that matrix generation within the implant would be enhanced with partial digestion of the edges of articular cartilage. Our hypothesis was tested by randomizing an osteochondral defect created in the trochlea of 14 New Zealand white rabbits to treatment with: (i) collagenase or (ii) saline, prior to insertion of the implant. At 1 and 3-month post-operatively, the gross morphology and histologic appearance of the implants and the surrounding tissue were assessed. At 3 months, the mechanical properties of the implant were also quantified. Overall, the hydrogel implants performed favorably; at all time-points and in all groups the implants remained well fixed, did not cause inflammation or synovitis, and did not cause extensive damage to the opposing articular cartilage. Regardless of treatment with saline or collagenase, at 1 month post-operatively implants from both groups had a contiguous interface with adjacent cartilage and were populated with chondrocyte-like cells. At 3 months fibrous encapsulation of all implants was evident, there was no difference between area of aggrecan staining in the collagenase versus saline groups, and implant modulus was similar in both groups; leading us to reject our hypothesis. In summary, a porous PVA osteochondral implant remained well fixed in a short term in vivo osteochondral defect model; however, matrix generation within the implant was not enhanced with partial digestion of adjacent articular cartilage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23846837      PMCID: PMC3839287          DOI: 10.1007/s10856-013-4999-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  28 in total

Review 1.  Complex knee reconstruction: articular cartilage treatment options.

Authors:  Brian J Cole; Stephen J Lee
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Intermittent micromotion inhibits bone ingrowth. Titanium implants in rabbits.

Authors:  P Aspenberg; S Goodman; S Toksvig-Larsen; L Ryd; T Albrektsson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1992-04

3.  Removal of proteoglycans from the surface of defects in articular cartilage transiently enhances coverage by repair cells.

Authors:  E B Hunziker; E Kapfinger
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-01

Review 4.  Articular cartilage: degeneration and osteoarthritis, repair, regeneration, and transplantation.

Authors:  J A Buckwalter; H J Mankin
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  1998

5.  Fixation of skeletal replacement by fiber metal composites.

Authors:  E Lembert; J Galante; W Rostoker
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Characterization of a macroporous polyvinyl alcohol scaffold for the repair of focal articular cartilage defects.

Authors:  Kenneth W Ng; Peter A Torzilli; Russell F Warren; Suzanne A Maher
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.963

7.  Poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel as an artificial articular cartilage: evaluation of biocompatibility.

Authors:  T Noguchi; T Yamamuro; M Oka; P Kumar; Y Kotoura; S Hyon; Y Ikada
Journal:  J Appl Biomater       Date:  1991

8.  Synthetic osteochondral replacement of the femoral articular surface.

Authors:  M Oka; Y S Chang; T Nakamura; K Ushio; J Toguchida; H O Gu
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-11

9.  Biphasic indentation of articular cartilage--I. Theoretical analysis.

Authors:  A F Mak; W M Lai; V C Mow
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  The chondrogenic potential of free autogenous periosteal grafts for biological resurfacing of major full-thickness defects in joint surfaces under the influence of continuous passive motion. An experimental investigation in the rabbit.

Authors:  S W O'Driscoll; F W Keeley; R B Salter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  7 in total

1.  The Scaffold-Articular Cartilage Interface: A Combined In Vitro and In Silico Analysis Under Controlled Loading Conditions.

Authors:  Tony Chen; Moira M McCarthy; Hongqiang Guo; Russell Warren; Suzanne A Maher
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Self-assembled monolayers of phosphonates promote primary chondrocyte adhesion to silicon dioxide and polyvinyl alcohol materials.

Authors:  Patrick E Donnelly; Laurianne Imbert; Kirsty L Culley; Russell F Warren; Tony Chen; Suzanne A Maher
Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed       Date:  2019-01-12       Impact factor: 3.517

3.  Evaluation of a press-fit osteochondral poly(ester-urethane) scaffold in a rabbit defect model.

Authors:  Iska Dresing; Stephan Zeiter; Jörg Auer; Mauro Alini; David Eglin
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  The porcine accessory carpal bone as a model for biologic joint replacement for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Brendan D Stoeckl; Hannah M Zlotnick; Megan J Farrell; George W Fryhofer; Michael W Hast; Liane M Miller; Mackenzie L Sennett; Josh R Baxter; Thomas P Schaer; Robert L Mauck; David R Steinberg
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 10.633

5.  Nuclear softening expedites interstitial cell migration in fibrous networks and dense connective tissues.

Authors:  Su-Jin Heo; Kwang Hoon Song; Shreyasi Thakur; Liane M Miller; Xuan Cao; Ana P Peredo; Breanna N Seiber; Feini Qu; Tristan P Driscoll; Vivek B Shenoy; Melike Lakadamyali; Jason A Burdick; Robert L Mauck
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 14.136

6.  Synthetic PVA Osteochondral Implants for the Knee Joint: Mechanical Characteristics During Simulated Gait.

Authors:  Tony Chen; Caroline Brial; Moira McCarthy; Russell F Warren; Suzanne A Maher
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 7.010

7.  Improved cartilage regeneration by implantation of acellular biomaterials after bone marrow stimulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies.

Authors:  Toin H van Kuppevelt; Rob B M de Vries; Michiel W Pot; Veronica K Gonzales; Pieter Buma; Joanna IntHout; Willeke F Daamen
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.984

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.