Literature DB >> 22285735

Sliding motion modulates stiffness and friction coefficient at the surface of tissue engineered cartilage.

S Grad1, M Loparic, R Peter, M Stolz, U Aebi, M Alini.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Functional cartilage tissue engineering aims to generate grafts with a functional surface, similar to that of authentic cartilage. Bioreactors that stimulate cell-scaffold constructs by simulating natural joint movements hold great potential to generate cartilage with adequate surface properties. In this study two methods based on atomic force microscopy (AFM) were applied to obtain information about the quality of engineered graft surfaces. For better understanding of the molecule-function relationships, AFM was complemented with immunohistochemistry.
METHODS: Bovine chondrocytes were seeded into polyurethane scaffolds and subjected to dynamic compression, applied by a ceramic ball, for 1h daily [loading group 1 (LG1)]. In loading group 2 (LG2), the ball additionally oscillated over the scaffold, generating sliding surface motion. After 3 weeks, the surfaces of the engineered constructs were analyzed by friction force and indentation-type AFM (IT-AFM). Results were complemented and compared to immunohistochemical analyses.
RESULTS: The loading type significantly influenced the mechanical and histological outcomes. Constructs of LG2 exhibited lowest friction coefficient and highest micro- and nanostiffness. Collagen type II and aggrecan staining were readily observed in all constructs and appeared to reach deeper areas in loaded (LG1, LG2) compared to unloaded scaffolds. Lubricin was specifically detected at the top surface of LG2.
CONCLUSIONS: This study proposes a quantitative AFM-based functional analysis at the micrometer- and nanometer scale to evaluate the quality of cartilage surfaces. Mechanical testing (load-bearing) combined with friction analysis (gliding) can provide important information. Notably, sliding-type biomechanical stimuli may favor (re-)generation and maintenance of functional articular surfaces and support the development of mechanically competent engineered cartilage. Copyright Â
© 2012 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22285735     DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.12.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  14 in total

1.  Deciphering mechanical regulation of chondrogenesis in fibrin-polyurethane composite scaffolds enriched with human mesenchymal stem cells: a dual computational and experimental approach.

Authors:  Houman Zahedmanesh; Martin Stoddart; Patrick Lezuo; Christoph Forkmann; Markus A Wimmmer; Mauro Alini; Hans Van Oosterwyck
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  AFM-Nanomechanical Test: An Interdisciplinary Tool That Links the Understanding of Cartilage and Meniscus Biomechanics, Osteoarthritis Degeneration, and Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Biao Han; Hadi T Nia; Chao Wang; Prashant Chandrasekaran; Qing Li; Daphney R Chery; Hao Li; Alan J Grodzinsky; Lin Han
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2017-07-11

Review 3.  Regenerative rehabilitation: The role of mechanotransduction in orthopaedic regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Vaida Glatt; Christopher H Evans; Martin J Stoddart
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Shear stress induced by fluid flow produces improvements in tissue-engineered cartilage.

Authors:  E Y Salinas; A Aryaei; N Paschos; E Berson; H Kwon; J C Hu; K A Athanasiou
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 9.954

Review 5.  A Guide for Using Mechanical Stimulation to Enhance Tissue-Engineered Articular Cartilage Properties.

Authors:  Evelia Y Salinas; Jerry C Hu; Kyriacos Athanasiou
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 6.389

6.  Particulate cartilage under bioreactor-induced compression and shear.

Authors:  Ning Wang; Sibylle Grad; Martin J Stoddart; Philipp Niemeyer; Kilian Reising; Hagen Schmal; Norbert P Südkamp; Mauro Alini; Gian M Salzmann
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Hyaluronan supplementation as a mechanical regulator of cartilage tissue development under joint-kinematic-mimicking loading.

Authors:  Yabin Wu; Martin J Stoddart; Karin Wuertz-Kozak; Sibylle Grad; Mauro Alini; Stephen J Ferguson
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Evaluation of a press-fit osteochondral poly(ester-urethane) scaffold in a rabbit defect model.

Authors:  Iska Dresing; Stephan Zeiter; Jörg Auer; Mauro Alini; David Eglin
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 9.  The tribology of cartilage: Mechanisms, experimental techniques, and relevance to translational tissue engineering.

Authors:  Jarrett M Link; Evelia Y Salinas; Jerry C Hu; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 2.063

10.  Divergence in chondrogenic potential between in vitro and in vivo of adipose- and synovial-stem cells from mouse and human.

Authors:  Chijimatsu Ryota; Miwa Satoshi; Okamura Gensuke; Miyahara Junya; Tachibana Naohiro; Ishikura Hisatoshi; Higuchi Junya; Maenohara Yuji; Tsuji Shinsaku; Sameshima Shin; Takagi Kentaro; Nakazato Keiu; Kawaguchi Kohei; Yamagami Ryota; Inui Hiroshi; Taketomi Shuji; Sakae Tanaka; Taku Saito
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 6.832

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.