Literature DB >> 22030089

Screening practices of unaffected people at familial risk of colorectal cancer.

Driss Ait Ouakrim1, Alex Boussioutas, Trevor Lockett, Ingrid Winship, Graham G Giles, Louisa B Flander, Louise Keogh, John L Hopper, Mark A Jenkins.   

Abstract

Our objective was to determine screening practices of unaffected people in the general population at moderately increased and potentially high risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) because of their family history of the disease. A total of 1,627 participants in the Australasian Colorectal Cancer Family Registry study were classified into two CRC risk categories, according to the strength of their family history of the disease. We calculated the proportion of participants that adhered to national CRC screening guidelines by age group and for each familial risk category. We carried out a multinomial logistic regression analysis to evaluate the associations between screening and sociodemographic factors. Of the 1,236 participants at moderately increased risk of CRC, 70 (6%) reported having undergone guideline-defined "appropriate" screening, 251 (20%) reported some, but less than appropriate screening, and 915 (74%) reported never having had any CRC screening test. Of the 392 participants at potentially high risk of CRC, three (1%) reported appropriate screening, 140 (36%) reported some, but less than appropriate screening, and 249 (64%) reported never having had any CRC screening test. On average, those of middle age, higher education, and who had resided in Australia longer were more likely to have had screening for CRC. The uptake of recommended screening by unaffected people at the highest familial risk of developing CRC is extremely low. Guidelines for CRC screening are not being implemented in the population. More research is needed to identify the reasons so as to enable development of strategies to improve participation in screening. ©2011 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22030089      PMCID: PMC3273548          DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-11-0229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)        ISSN: 1940-6215


  33 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in moderate and high risk groups (update from 2002).

Authors:  Stuart R Cairns; John H Scholefield; Robert J Steele; Malcolm G Dunlop; Huw J W Thomas; Gareth D Evans; Jayne A Eaden; Matthew D Rutter; Wendy P Atkin; Brian P Saunders; Anneke Lucassen; Paul Jenkins; Peter D Fairclough; Christopher R J Woodhouse
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Do colorectal cancer patients understand that their family is at risk?

Authors:  David T Rubin; Rishi K Gandhi; Jeremy T Hetzel; Sydney H Kinnear; Andrew Aronsohn; Gordon Wood; Nicole Yadron
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Population-based screening for colorectal cancer: Australian research and implementation.

Authors:  Graeme P Young
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.029

Review 4.  Hereditary and familial colon cancer.

Authors:  Kory W Jasperson; Thérèse M Tuohy; Deborah W Neklason; Randall W Burt
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Population-based family history-specific risks for colorectal cancer: a constellation approach.

Authors:  David P Taylor; Randall W Burt; Marc S Williams; Peter J Haug; Lisa A Cannon-Albright
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 6.  Cancer screening in the United States, 2008: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and cancer screening issues.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Vilma Cokkinides; Otis Webb Brawley
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Influence of family history and preventive health behaviors on colorectal cancer screening in African Americans.

Authors:  Kathleen A Griffith; Deborah B McGuire; Renee Royak-Schaler; Keith O Plowden; Eileen K Steinberger
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Colorectal cancer screening among first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients: benefits and barriers.

Authors:  Lloyd A Mack; Linda S Cook; Walley J Temple; Linda E Carlson; Robert J Hilsden; Elizabeth Oddone Paolucci
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  High uptake of colonoscopy in first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer in a healthcare region: a population-based, prospective study.

Authors:  F Armelao; P G Orlandi; E Tasini; G Franceschini; R Franch; C Paternolli; G de Pretis
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 10.  Family-based screening for colorectal cancer: The Australian perspective.

Authors:  Barbara A Leggett
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.029

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Screening participation for people at increased risk of colorectal cancer due to family history: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Driss Ait Ouakrim; Trevor Lockett; Alex Boussioutas; John L Hopper; Mark A Jenkins
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 2.  Cancer risk assessment tools in primary care: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  J G Walker; S Licqurish; P P C Chiang; M Pirotta; J D Emery
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 3.  The evolution of colorectal cancer genetics-Part 1: from discovery to practice.

Authors:  Andrew T Schlussel; Ronald A Gagliano; Susan Seto-Donlon; Faye Eggerding; Timothy Donlon; Jeffrey Berenberg; Henry T Lynch
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-10

Review 4.  Understanding the contribution of family history to colorectal cancer risk and its clinical implications: A state-of-the-science review.

Authors:  Jan T Lowery; Dennis J Ahnen; Paul C Schroy; Heather Hampel; Nancy Baxter; C Richard Boland; Randall W Burt; Lynn Butterly; Megan Doerr; Mary Doroshenk; W Gregory Feero; Nora Henrikson; Uri Ladabaum; David Lieberman; Elizabeth G McFarland; Susan K Peterson; Martha Raymond; N Jewel Samadder; Sapna Syngal; Thomas K Weber; Ann G Zauber; Robert Smith
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Quantifying the utility of single nucleotide polymorphisms to guide colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Mark A Jenkins; Enes Makalic; James G Dowty; Daniel F Schmidt; Gillian S Dite; Robert J MacInnis; Driss Ait Ouakrim; Mark Clendenning; Louisa B Flander; Oliver K Stanesby; John L Hopper; Aung K Win; Daniel D Buchanan
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.404

6.  Ethnic differences and predictors of colonoscopy, prostate-specific antigen, and mammography screening participation in the multiethnic cohort.

Authors:  Brook E Harmon; Melissa A Little; Erica D Woekel; Reynolette Ettienne; Camonia R Long; Lynne R Wilkens; Loic Le Marchand; Brian E Henderson; Laurence N Kolonel; Gertraud Maskarinec
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2014-03-22       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Exploring a novel method for optimising the implementation of a colorectal cancer risk prediction tool into primary care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Shakira Milton; Jon D Emery; Jane Rinaldi; Joanne Kinder; Adrian Bickerstaffe; Sibel Saya; Mark A Jenkins; Jennifer McIntosh
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 7.960

8.  Testing Interventions to Motivate and Educate (TIME): A multi-level intervention to improve colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Jessica L Krok-Schoen; Gregory S Young; Michael L Pennell; Paul L Reiter; Mira L Katz; Douglas M Post; Cathy M Tatum; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2015-01-01

9.  A population-based cross-sectional study of colorectal cancer screening practices of first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Ryan J Courtney; Christine L Paul; Mariko L Carey; Robert W Sanson-Fisher; Finlay A Macrae; Catherine D'Este; David Hill; Daniel Barker; Jody Simmons
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Can a print-based intervention increase screening for first degree relatives of people with colorectal cancer? A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Mariko Carey; Robert Sanson-Fisher; Finlay Macrae; Emilie Cameron; David Hill; Catherine D'Este; Jody Simmons; Christopher Doran
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.