PURPOSE: To develop a reliable and efficient digital method to quantify planimetric Goldmann visual field (GVF) data to monitor disease course and treatment responses in retinal degenerative diseases. METHODS: A novel method to digitally quantify GVFs using Adobe Photoshop CS3 was developed for comparison to traditional digital planimetry (Placom 45C digital planimeter; Engineer Supply, Lynchburg, Virginia, USA). GVFs from 20 eyes from 10 patients with Stargardt disease were quantified to assess the difference between the two methods (a total of 230 measurements per method). This quantification approach was also applied to 13 patients with X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (XLRP) with mutations in RPGR. RESULTS: Overall, measurements using Adobe Photoshop were more rapidly performed than those using conventional planimetry. Photoshop measurements also exhibited less inter- and intraobserver variability. GVF areas for the I4e isopter in patients with the same mutation in RPGR who were nearby in age had similar qualitative and quantitative areas. CONCLUSIONS: Quantification of GVFs using Adobe Photoshop is quicker, more reliable, and less user dependent than conventional digital planimetry. It will be a useful tool for both retrospective and prospective studies of disease course as well as for monitoring treatment response in clinical trials for retinal degenerative diseases.
PURPOSE: To develop a reliable and efficient digital method to quantify planimetric Goldmann visual field (GVF) data to monitor disease course and treatment responses in retinal degenerative diseases. METHODS: A novel method to digitally quantify GVFs using Adobe Photoshop CS3 was developed for comparison to traditional digital planimetry (Placom 45C digital planimeter; Engineer Supply, Lynchburg, Virginia, USA). GVFs from 20 eyes from 10 patients with Stargardt disease were quantified to assess the difference between the two methods (a total of 230 measurements per method). This quantification approach was also applied to 13 patients with X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (XLRP) with mutations in RPGR. RESULTS: Overall, measurements using Adobe Photoshop were more rapidly performed than those using conventional planimetry. Photoshop measurements also exhibited less inter- and intraobserver variability. GVF areas for the I4e isopter in patients with the same mutation in RPGR who were nearby in age had similar qualitative and quantitative areas. CONCLUSIONS: Quantification of GVFs using Adobe Photoshop is quicker, more reliable, and less user dependent than conventional digital planimetry. It will be a useful tool for both retrospective and prospective studies of disease course as well as for monitoring treatment response in clinical trials for retinal degenerative diseases.
Authors: Michael P Barry; Ava K Bittner; Liancheng Yang; Rebecca Marcus; Mian Haris Iftikhar; Gislin Dagnelie Journal: Optom Vis Sci Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 1.973
Authors: Vaidehi S Dedania; Jerry Y Liu; Dana Schlegel; Chris A Andrews; Kari Branham; Naheed W Khan; David C Musch; John R Heckenlively; K Thiran Jayasundera Journal: Ophthalmic Genet Date: 2017-07-13 Impact factor: 1.803
Authors: Maria Fernanda Abalem; Benjamin Otte; Chris Andrews; Katherine A Joltikov; Kari Branham; Abigail T Fahim; Dana Schlegel; Cynthia X Qian; John R Heckenlively; Thiran Jayasundera Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2017-10-14 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Gabrielle D Lacy; Maria Fernanda Abalem; Lilia T Popova; Erin P Santos; Gina Yu; Hanan Y Rakine; Julie M Rosenthal; Joshua R Ehrlich; David C Musch; K Thiran Jayasundera Journal: Ophthalmic Genet Date: 2020-06-22 Impact factor: 1.803
Authors: Callie Deng; Peter Y Zhao; Kari Branham; Dana Schlegel; Abigail T Fahim; Thiran K Jayasundera; Naheed Khan; Cagri G Besirli Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 3.535
Authors: Mohsin H Ali; Mark S Dikopf; Anthony G Finder; Ahmad A Aref; Thasarat Vajaranant; Jose de la Cruz; Maria Soledad Cortina Journal: Cornea Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Yi Zhai; Manlong Xu; Ioannis S Dimopoulos; David G Birch; Paul S Bernstein; Jenny Holt; David Kirn; Peter Francis; Ian M MacDonald Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2020-06-18 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Lynn K Stanwyck; Weilin Chan; Arjun Sood; Gayatri Susarla; John Romano; Maria Pefkianaki; Kanishka Thiran Jayasundera; John R Heckenlively; Steven K Lundy; Lucia Sobrin Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2020-06-16 Impact factor: 3.283