Literature DB >> 24662953

Prevalence of workers with shifts in hearing by industry: a comparison of OSHA and NIOSH Hearing Shift Criteria.

Elizabeth A Masterson1, Marie Haring Sweeney, James A Deddens, Christa L Themann, David K Wall.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the prevalence of workers with National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health significant threshold shifts (NSTS), Occupational Safety and Health Administration standard threshold shifts (OSTS), and with OSTS with age correction (OSTS-A), by industry using North American Industry Classification System codes.
METHODS: From 2001 to 2010, worker audiograms were examined. Prevalence and adjusted prevalence ratios for NSTS were estimated by industry. NSTS, OSTS, and OSTS-A prevalences were compared by industry.
RESULTS: Twenty percent of workers had an NSTS, 14% had an OSTS, and 6% had an OSTS-A. For most industries, the OSTS and OSTS-A criteria identified 28% to 36% and 66% to 74% fewer workers than the NSTS criteria, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of NSTS criteria allowing for earlier detection of shifts in hearing is recommended for improved prevention of occupational hearing loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24662953      PMCID: PMC4535326          DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1076-2752            Impact factor:   2.162


  20 in total

1.  The likelihood of detecting a significant hearing threshold shift among noise-exposed workers subjected to annual audiometric testing.

Authors:  R Hétu; H T Quoc; P Duguay
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  1990-08

2.  Easy SAS calculations for risk or prevalence ratios and differences.

Authors:  Donna Spiegelman; Ellen Hertzmark
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-06-29       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 3.  Hearing: the effects of chemicals.

Authors:  L P Rybak
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  Trends in the prevalence of hearing loss among young adults entering an industrial workforce 1985 to 2004.

Authors:  Peter M Rabinowitz; Martin D Slade; Deron Galusha; Christine Dixon-Ernst; Mark R Cullen
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Occupational noise-induced hearing loss reports and tinnitus in Finland.

Authors:  Roderik Mrena; Matti Ylikoski; Antti Mäkitie; Ulla Pirvola; Jukka Ylikoski
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.494

6.  Hearing difficulty attributable to employment by industry and occupation: an analysis of the National Health Interview Survey--United States, 1997 to 2003.

Authors:  SangWoo Tak; Geoffrey M Calvert
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.162

7.  Exposure to hazardous workplace noise and use of hearing protection devices among US workers--NHANES, 1999-2004.

Authors:  Sangwoo Tak; Rickie R Davis; Geoffrey M Calvert
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 8.  Audiological management of noise induced hearing loss.

Authors:  E Arslan; E Orzan
Journal:  Scand Audiol Suppl       Date:  1998

9.  Audiometric "early flags" for occupational hearing loss.

Authors:  Peter M Rabinowitz; Deron Galusha; Christine Dixon Ernst; Martin D Slade
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.162

10.  The risk of noise-induced hearing loss in the Danish workforce.

Authors:  Tine Rubak; Samuel A Kock; Birger Koefoed-Nielsen; Jens Peter Bonde; Henrik A Kolstad
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2006 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 0.867

View more
  6 in total

1.  Prevalence of hearing protection device non-use among noise-exposed US workers in 2007 and 2014.

Authors:  Deirdre R Green; Elizabeth A Masterson; Christa L Themann
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.079

2.  Prevalence of hearing loss among noise-exposed workers within the agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting sector, 2003-2012.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Masterson; Christa L Themann; Geoffrey M Calvert
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 2.214

3.  Prevalence of hearing loss among noise-exposed workers within the Mining and Oil and Gas Extraction sectors, 2006-2015.

Authors:  Sean M Lawson; Elizabeth A Masterson; Amanda S Azman
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 3.079

Review 4.  Classification of audiograms in the prevention of noise-induced hearing loss: A clinical perspective.

Authors:  Zumbi Musiba
Journal:  S Afr J Commun Disord       Date:  2020-03-03

Review 5.  Loud Music and Leisure Noise Is a Common Cause of Chronic Hearing Loss, Tinnitus and Hyperacusis.

Authors:  Martin Pienkowski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Work-Related Noise Exposure in a Cohort of Patients with Chronic Tinnitus: Analysis of Demographic and Audiological Characteristics.

Authors:  Massimo Ralli; Maria Paola Balla; Antonio Greco; Giancarlo Altissimi; Pasquale Ricci; Rosaria Turchetta; Armando de Virgilio; Marco de Vincentiis; Serafino Ricci; Giancarlo Cianfrone
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.