Literature DB >> 34597431

Prevalence of hearing protection device non-use among noise-exposed US workers in 2007 and 2014.

Deirdre R Green1, Elizabeth A Masterson1, Christa L Themann1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study estimated the prevalence of hearing protection device (HPD) non-use among US workers exposed to hazardous workplace noise and provided risk estimates.
METHODS: Self-reported data from the National Health Interview Survey in 2007 (15,852 workers) and 2014 (23,656 workers) were examined. Weighted prevalence and adjusted prevalence ratios of HPD non-use (using HPDs half the time or less when exposed to hazardous noise) were estimated by demographic, industry, and occupation. Differences in the prevalences of non-use were estimated and compared.
RESULTS: The prevalence of HPD non-use was 53% among all noise-exposed workers in 2014. Workers in the Accommodation and Food Services industry had the highest prevalence (90%) and risk (PR: 2.47, 95% confidence interval: 1.54-3.96) of HPD non-use. The industries with the lowest prevalences of noise exposure, including Finance and Insurance (2%) and Health Care and Social Assistance (4%), had some of the highest prevalences of HPD non-use (80% and 83%, respectively). There were no statistically significant changes in HPD non-use among industries between 2007 and 2014. Among occupations, HPD non-use increased 37% in Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports and Media, and decreased 39% in Architecture and Engineering.
CONCLUSION: The prevalence of HPD non-use remains high; especially within industries and occupations with fewer noise-exposed workers. These groups need targeted attention to increase awareness and compliance. Employers should require HPD use and trainings among noise-exposed workers and provide an assortment of HPDs tailored to noise level and type, workplace environment, communication and audibility needs, and individual comfort and convenience.
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hazardous noise; hearing protection; occupational noise exposure; prevalence; surveillance

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34597431      PMCID: PMC9020887          DOI: 10.1002/ajim.23291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ind Med        ISSN: 0271-3586            Impact factor:   3.079


  40 in total

1.  Hearing protector use in noise-exposed workers: a retrospective look at 1983.

Authors:  Rickie R Davis; W Karl Sieber
Journal:  AIHA J (Fairfax, Va)       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr

2.  Factors influencing use of hearing protection among farmers: a test of the pender health promotion model.

Authors:  Marjorie McCullagh; Sally L Lusk; David L Ronis
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Effectiveness of a tailored intervention to increase factory workers' use of hearing protection.

Authors:  Sally L Lusk; David L Ronis; Anamaria S Kazanis; Brenda L Eakin; OiSaeng Hong; Delbert M Raymond
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  The effect of a booster intervention to promote hearing protection behavior in operating engineers.

Authors:  Oisaeng Hong; Dal Lae Chin; Lauren A Fiola; Anamaria S Kazanis
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 2.214

5.  Complying with a corporate global noise health surveillance procedure--do the benefits outweigh the costs?

Authors:  Patricia K Bertsche; Edward Mensah; Thomas Stevens
Journal:  AAOHN J       Date:  2006-08

6.  Working in noise with a hearing loss: perceptions from workers, supervisors, and hearing conservation program managers.

Authors:  Thais C Morata; Christa L Themann; Robert F Randolph; Babette L Verbsky; David C Byrne; Efrem R Reeves
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Cigarette smoking and hearing loss: the epidemiology of hearing loss study.

Authors:  K J Cruickshanks; R Klein; B E Klein; T L Wiley; D M Nondahl; T S Tweed
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-06-03       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Hearing protection use in manufacturing workers: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Ravi K Reddy; David Welch; Peter Thorne; Shanthi Ameratunga
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.867

9.  Gender differences in use of hearing protection devices among farm operators.

Authors:  Marjorie C McCullagh; Tanima Banerjee; James J Yang; Janice Bernick; Sonia Duffy; Richard Redman
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.867

10.  Cigarette smoking, passive smoking, alcohol consumption, and hearing loss.

Authors:  Piers Dawes; Karen J Cruickshanks; David R Moore; Mark Edmondson-Jones; Abby McCormack; Heather Fortnum; Kevin J Munro
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-05-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.