Literature DB >> 28873970

Immunosuppressive agents in adult kidney transplantation in the National Health Service: a model-based economic evaluation.

Tristan M Snowsill1, Jason Moore2, Ruben E Mujica Mota1, Jaime L Peters1, Tracey L Jones-Hughes1, Nicola J Huxley1, Helen F Coelho1, Marcela Haasova1, Chris Cooper1, Jenny A Lowe1, Jo L Varley-Campbell1, Louise Crathorne1, Matt J Allwood1, Rob Anderson1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppression is required in kidney transplantation to prevent rejection and prolong graft survival. We conducted an economic evaluation to support England's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence in developing updated guidance on the use of immunosuppression, incorporating new immunosuppressive agents, and addressing changes in pricing and the evidence base.
METHODS: A discrete-time state transition model was developed to simulate adult kidney transplant patients over their lifetime. A total of 16 different regimens were modelled to assess the cost-effectiveness of basiliximab and rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rabbit ATG) as induction agents (with no antibody induction as a comparator) and immediate-release tacrolimus, prolonged-release tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, mycophenolate sodium, sirolimus, everolimus and belatacept as maintenance agents (with ciclosporin and azathioprine as comparators). Graft survival was extrapolated from acute rejection rates, graft function and post-transplant diabetes rates, all estimated at 12 months post-transplantation. National Health Service (NHS) and personal social services costs were included. Cost-effectiveness thresholds of £20 000 and £30 000 per quality-adjusted life year were used.
RESULTS: Basiliximab was predicted to be more effective and less costly than rabbit ATG and induction without antibodies. Immediate-release tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil were cost-effective as maintenance therapies. Other therapies were either more expensive and less effective or would only be cost-effective if a threshold in excess of £100 000 per quality-adjusted life year were used.
CONCLUSIONS: A regimen comprising induction with basiliximab, followed by maintenance therapy with immediate-release tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil, is likely to be effective for uncomplicated adult kidney transplant patients and a cost-effective use of NHS resources. © Crown copyright 2017.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cost-effectiveness; cost–utility; economic model; immunosuppression; kidney transplantation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28873970      PMCID: PMC5837729          DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfx074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant        ISSN: 0931-0509            Impact factor:   5.992


  21 in total

1.  Populating an economic model with health state utility values: moving toward better practice.

Authors:  Roberta Ara; John E Brazier
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 5.725

2.  Systematic reviews of economic evaluations: utility or futility?

Authors:  Rob Anderson
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Projecting long-term graft and patient survival after transplantation.

Authors:  Adrian R Levy; Andrew H Briggs; Karissa Johnston; J Ross MacLean; Yong Yuan; Gilbert J L'Italien; Anupama Kalsekar; Mark A Schnitzler
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.725

5.  A three-arm study comparing immediate tacrolimus therapy with antithymocyte globulin induction therapy followed by tacrolimus or cyclosporine A in adult renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Bernard Charpentier; Lionel Rostaing; Francois Berthoux; Philippe Lang; Giovanni Civati; Jean-Louis Touraine; Jean-Paul Squifflet; Paul Vialtel; Daniel Abramowicz; Georges Mourad; Philippe Wolf; Elisabeth Cassuto; Bruno Moulin; Gerard Rifle; André Pruna; Pierre Merville; Françoise Mignon; Christophe Legendre; Patrick Le Pogamp; Yvon Lebranchu; Olivier Toupance; Bruno Hurault De Ligny; Guy Touchard; Michel Olmer; Raj Purgus; Claire Pouteil-Noble; Denis Glotz; Bernard Bourbigot; Michel Leski; Jean-Pierre Wauters; Michèle Kessler
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2003-03-27       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Rabbit antithymocyte globulin versus basiliximab in renal transplantation.

Authors:  Daniel C Brennan; John A Daller; Kathleen D Lake; Diane Cibrik; Domingo Del Castillo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  UK Renal Registry 16th annual report: chapter 3 demographic and biochemistry profile of kidney transplant recipients in the UK in 2012: national and centre-specific analyses.

Authors:  Rishi Pruthi; Anna Casula; Iain Macphee
Journal:  Nephron Clin Pract       Date:  2014-02-14

8.  UK Renal Registry 16th annual report: chapter 2 UK RRT prevalence in 2012: national and centre-specific analyses.

Authors:  Catriona Shaw; David Pitcher; Rishi Pruthi; Damian Fogarty
Journal:  Nephron Clin Pract       Date:  2014-02-14

9.  Cost utility analysis of immunosuppressive regimens in adult renal transplant recipients in England and Wales.

Authors:  Gorden Muduma; Jane Shaw; Warren M Hart; Abayomi Odeyemi; Isaac Odeyemi
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 2.711

10.  The value of heterogeneity for cost-effectiveness subgroup analysis: conceptual framework and application.

Authors:  Manuel A Espinoza; Andrea Manca; Karl Claxton; Mark J Sculpher
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 2.583

View more
  4 in total

1.  Wuzhi Capsule Dosage Affects Tacrolimus Elimination in Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients, as Determined by a Population Pharmacokinetics Analysis.

Authors:  Lizhi Chen; Yunyun Yang; Xuebin Wang; Chenyu Wang; Weiwei Lin; Zheng Jiao; Zhuo Wang
Journal:  Pharmgenomics Pers Med       Date:  2021-09-03

2.  A Systematic Review of Kidney Transplantation Decision Modelling Studies.

Authors:  Mohsen Yaghoubi; Sonya Cressman; Louisa Edwards; Steven Shechter; Mary M Doyle-Waters; Paul Keown; Ruth Sapir-Pichhadze; Stirling Bryan
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Biomarkers for assessing acute kidney injury for people who are being considered for admission to critical care: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Miriam Brazzelli; Lorna Aucott; Magaly Aceves-Martins; Clare Robertson; Elisabet Jacobsen; Mari Imamura; Amudha Poobalan; Paul Manson; Graham Scotland; Callum Kaye; Simon Sawhney; Dwayne Boyers
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 4.106

Review 4.  Post-Transplantation Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Syed Haris Ahmed; Kathryn Biddle; Titus Augustine; Shazli Azmi
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.945

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.