Literature DB >> 24661856

Increasing the number of lymph nodes examined after colectomy does not improve colon cancer staging.

Cristina N Budde1, Vassiliki L Tsikitis2, Karen E Deveney2, Brian S Diggs2, Kim C Lu2, Daniel O Herzig2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current quality initiatives call for examination of at least 12 lymph nodes in curative colon cancer resections. The aim of this study was to determine if the number of nodes harvested has increased, and if the increased number nodes correlates with improved staging or overall survival. STUDY
DESIGN: A review of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program database from 2004-2010 was performed. All patients who underwent colon cancer resection during this date range were analyzed. Number of nodes retrieved, patient stage, overall survival, and overall survival by stage were examined. Multivariable analysis controlled for stage, cancer site, age, year of diagnosis, and number of nodes retrieved. Improved staging was defined as increased detection of stage III patients.
RESULTS: A total of 147,076 patients met inclusion criteria. Median number of nodes analyzed increased sequentially with each year examined, from 12 in 2004 to 17 in 2010. Despite greater number of total nodes obtained and analyzed, there was no increase in the percentage of patients with positive nodes (stage III disease). On multivariable analysis, after controlling for stage, site of disease, age, and year of diagnosis, there was a slight overall survival benefit with increasing nodal retrieval (hazard ratio = 0.987 for each additional node removed; 95% CI, 0.986-0.988; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Since quality initiatives have been put in place, there has been an increase in the number of nodes examined in colon cancer resections, but no improvement in staging. The improved survival seen with higher node counts was independent of stage, site of disease, patient age, and year of diagnosis.
Copyright © 2014 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24661856     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.01.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  14 in total

Review 1.  Management of nodal disease from colon cancer in the laparoscopic era.

Authors:  Corrado Pedrazzani; Lelde Lauka; Simone Sforza; Andrea Ruzzenente; Filippo Nifosì; GianGaetano Delaini; Alfredo Guglielmi
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-11-22       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Mesenteric root dissection with individualized ileo-colic vessel ligation versus mesenteric pedicle stapling.

Authors:  Ilan Kent; Yaron Rudnicki; Yasmin Abu-Ghanem; Ian White; Baruch Spitz; Shmuel Avital
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Stage migration vs immunology: The lymph node count story in colon cancer.

Authors:  Bruno Märkl
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  The risk factors of local recurrence and distant metastasis on pT1/T2N0 mid-low rectal cancer after total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  I-Li Lai; Jeng-Fu You; Yih-Jong Chern; Wen-Sy Tsai; Jy-Ming Chiang; Pao-Shiu Hsieh; Hsin-Yuan Hung; Yu-Jen Hsu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  Hospital-level compliance with the commission on cancer's quality of care measures and the association with patient survival.

Authors:  Daniel P Nussbaum; Christel N Rushing; Zhifei Sun; Babatunde A Yerokun; Mathias Worni; Robert S Saunders; Mark B McClellan; Donna Niedzwiecki; Rachel A Greenup; Dan G Blazer
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 4.452

6.  A Nomogram to Predict Adequate Lymph Node Recovery before Resection of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Zhen-Yu Zhang; Cong Li; Wei Gao; Xiao-Wei Yin; Qi-Feng Luo; Nan Liu; Shiva Basnet; Zhen-Ling Dai; Hai-Yan Ge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Lymph node retrieval in colorectal cancer: determining factors and prognostic significance.

Authors:  Johannes Betge; Lars Harbaum; Marion J Pollheimer; Richard A Lindtner; Peter Kornprat; Matthias P Ebert; Cord Langner
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Role of lymph node yield and lymph node ratio in predicting outcomes in non-metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  C H A Lee; S Wilkins; K Oliva; M P Staples; P J McMurrick
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2018-08-08

9.  Lymph nodes' evaluation in relation to colorectal cancer staging among African Americans.

Authors:  Hassan Ashktorab; Temitayo Ogundipe; Hassan Brim; Anahita Shahnazi; Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Edward Lee; Babak Shokrani; Mehdi Nouraie
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Impact of bowel resection margins in node negative colon cancer.

Authors:  Ricardo Rocha; Rui Marinho; David Aparício; Marta Fragoso; Marta Sousa; António Gomes; Carlos Leichsenring; Carla Carneiro; Vasco Geraldes; Vítor Nunes
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-11-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.