Literature DB >> 26487235

Mesenteric root dissection with individualized ileo-colic vessel ligation versus mesenteric pedicle stapling.

Ilan Kent1, Yaron Rudnicki2, Yasmin Abu-Ghanem2, Ian White2, Baruch Spitz2, Shmuel Avital2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Numerous factors have been associated with the number of lymph nodes retrieved during laparoscopic colectomy. This study compared the impact of vascular pedicle ligation method on the number of retrieved lymph nodes in patients undergoing laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer. Mesenteric root dissection with individualized vessel ligation was compared to en bloc vascular root stapling.
METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected from a database of patients' charts including operative and pathological reports. All patients that underwent laparoscopic colectomy in a single department were identified. Patients that underwent elective laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer were further evaluated. The impact of the method used for ileo-colic vascular transection, age, gender, nodes status, T stage, BMI and the operating surgeon on the number of retrieved lymph nodes was studied.
RESULTS: Among 239 laparoscopic colectomies, 75 patients underwent elective laparoscopic right colectomy for cancer. Ileo-colic vascular transection was routinely performed at the level of the inferior border of the pancreas. In total, 34 patients underwent ileo-colic vascular root dissection with individualized vessel ligation and 41 underwent vascular root stapling. No difference was found in the mean number of retrieved lymph nodes between pedicle dissection and vascular root stapling (18.7 ± 5.9 vs. 19.6 ± 7.9, P = 0.396), and in the rate of patients who had 12 nodes or more (97.1 vs. 92.7 %, P = 0.401). BMI above 30 was associated with decreased number of retrieved nodes (P = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: No difference was found in the number of retrieved lymph nodes between ileo-colic vascular root dissection with individual vessel ligation and vascular root stapling in patients undergoing laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer. High BMI was associated with decreased number of retrieved nodes in both groups. A standard approach regarding the level of mesenteric root transection, regardless of the ligation approach, leads to adequate lymph node harvesting by different surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenocarcinoma; Laparoscopic colectomy; Ligation method; Lymph nodes; Vascular pedicle

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26487235     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4593-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  17 in total

1.  Advanced fellowship training is associated with improved lymph node retrieval in colon cancer resections.

Authors:  Andrew Barbas; Ryan Turley; Christopher Mantyh; John Migaly
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 2.  Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review.

Authors:  George J Chang; Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas; John M Skibber; Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Influence of age and site of disease on lymph node yield in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Omid Ahmadi; Mark D Stringer; Michael A Black; John L McCall
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  2014-06-06

4.  Variation in lymph node assessment after colon cancer resection: patient, surgeon, pathologist, or hospital?

Authors:  Hari Nathan; Andrew D Shore; Robert A Anders; Elizabeth C Wick; Susan L Gearhart; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Individual surgeon, pathologist, and other factors affecting lymph node harvest in stage II colon carcinoma. is a minimum of 12 examined lymph nodes sufficient?

Authors:  Luca Stocchi; Victor W Fazio; Ian Lavery; Jeff Hammel
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Number of nodes examined and staging accuracy in colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  J H Wong; R Severino; M B Honnebier; P Tom; T S Namiki
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Clinical and pathologic factors that predict lymph node yield from surgical specimens in colorectal cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  Joanne F Chou; David Row; Mithat Gonen; Yi-Hai Liu; Deborah Schrag; Martin R Weiser
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Lymph node evaluation and long-term survival in Stage II and Stage III colon cancer: a national study.

Authors:  Ryash Vather; Tarik Sammour; Arman Kahokehr; Andrew B Connolly; Andrew G Hill
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Factors affecting the number of lymph nodes retrieved in colorectal cancer specimens.

Authors:  Michelle A Ostadi; Julie L Harnish; Stacey Stegienko; David R Urbach
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  The lymph node ratio optimises staging in patients with node positive colon cancer with implications for adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Susan J Moug; Raymond Oliphant; Margaret Balsitis; Richard G Molloy; David S Morrison
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.