Literature DB >> 24661366

The extent of linkage disequilibrium in beef cattle breeds using high-density SNP genotypes.

Laercio R Porto-Neto, James W Kijas, Antonio Reverter1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The extent of linkage disequilibrium (LD) between molecular markers impacts genome-wide association studies and implementation of genomic selection. The availability of high-density single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping platforms makes it possible to investigate LD at an unprecedented resolution. In this work, we characterised LD decay in breeds of beef cattle of taurine, indicine and composite origins and explored its variation across autosomes and the X chromosome.
FINDINGS: In each breed, LD decayed rapidly and r2 was less than 0.2 for marker pairs separated by 50 kb. The LD decay curves clustered into three groups of similar LD decay that distinguished the three main cattle types. At short distances between markers (<10 kb), taurine breeds showed higher LD (r2=0.45) than their indicine (r2=0.25) and composite (r2=0.32) counterparts. This higher LD in taurine breeds was attributed to a smaller effective population size and a stronger bottleneck during breed formation. Using all SNPs on only the X chromosome, the three cattle types could still be distinguished. However for taurine breeds, the LD decay on the X chromosome was much faster and the background level much lower than for indicine breeds and composite populations. When using only SNPs that were polymorphic in all breeds, the analysis of the X chromosome mimicked that of the autosomes.
CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of LD mirrored some aspects of the history of breed populations and showed a sharp decay with increasing physical distance between markers. We conclude that the availability of the HD chip can be used to detect association signals that remained hidden when using lower density genotyping platforms, since LD dropped below 0.2 at distances of 50 kb.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24661366      PMCID: PMC4021229          DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-46-22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Sel Evol        ISSN: 0999-193X            Impact factor:   4.297


Background

Linkage disequilibrium (LD) between molecular markers reflects the correlation between genotypes of two markers or the degree of non-random association between their alleles. Previous studies that used single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to describe patterns of LD in cattle at the whole-genome level [1-6] have suggested that 30 000 to 300 000 SNPs are necessary to perform a genome-wide association study (GWAS), depending on the trait studied and the statistical power desired [1,2]. Today, the availability of high-density SNP platforms that can assay more than 0.5 million loci offers the required marker density. The extent of LD has implications for both GWAS and the delivery of accurate genomic predictions. However, its importance is often neglected despite the fact that it is known that it can introduce bias. Collecting and using SNP genotyping data have exploded for cattle in the last few years due in part to decreasing genotyping cost and to efforts to improve cattle breeding through genomic selection. Despite this, few studies have documented the behaviour of LD using the expanded set of 777 000 SNPs available on the BovineHD platform (Illumina Inc, San Diego). One of the significant advances of this denser chip is that it allows for an accurate estimation of LD over short physical distances as it contains many more marker pairs separated by 10 kb or less. Here, we present the LD decay curves for SNPs on bovine autosomes and the X chromosome for three genetic groups of cattle breeds: Bos taurus (taurine), Bos indicus (indicine) and a composite beef cattle group. The results were compared to an independent population to confirm and potentially generalize the findings. This report is intended to be used as an updated description of the extent of LD in beef cattle.

Methods

All analyses were performed using genotypes generated in previous work. Therefore, for this study, no animal ethics approval was requested because no new animals were sampled. Animals used in this study (Table  1) were part of a large experimental Australian population [7] that includes the three main cattle types: Bos taurus breeds (Angus, Hereford, Limousin and Shorthorn), Bos indicus (Brahman) and composite cattle (Tropical Composite, Santa Gertrudis and Belmont Red). To confirm our findings, genotyping data from each cattle type (Angus, Brahman and Santa Gertrudis) were sourced from the Bovine HapMap consortium [3].
Table 1

Description of samples and summary of results*

BreedBreed typeTotal nbNb of males Pn He LD at 10 kb autosLD at 10 kb BTAXLD at 70 kb autosLD at 70 kb BTAX
Australian population
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Angus
Bt
195
165
0.85
0.27
0.46
0.47
0.20
0.25
Hereford
Bt
79
73
0.85
0.31
0.49
0.51
0.23
0.28
Limousin
Bt
62
58
0.86
0.30
0.42
0.49
0.15
0.23
Shorthorn
Bt
130
127
0.90
0.25
0.43
0.46
0.19
0.27
Tropical Composite
Bt × Bi
351
186
1.00
0.35
0.30
0.43
0.13
0.33
Santa Gertrudis
Bt × Bi
168
82
0.99
0.33
0.32
0.47
0.16
0.37
Belmont Red
Bt × Bi
97
77
1.00
0.34
0.33
0.44
0.15
0.34
Brahman
Bi
519
304
1.00
0.26
0.25
0.42
0.13
0.32
Bovine HapMap population
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Angus
Bt
55
42
0.84
0.29
0.46
0.47
0.20
0.23
Santa Gertrudis
Bt × Bi
35
32
0.98
0.34
0.34
0.48
0.18
0.39
BrahmanBi46360.910.250.280.430.160.33

*Bt = Bos taurus; Bi = Bos indicus; Bt × Bi = composite breed; Pn = proportion of polymorphic SNPs; He = gene diversity or heterozygosity; 10 kb = average r2 of all pairs of SNPs that are between 9.5 to 10.5 kb apart; Autos = autosomes; 70 kb = average r2 of all pairs of SNPs that are between 69.5 to 70.5 kb apart.

Description of samples and summary of results* *Bt = Bos taurus; Bi = Bos indicus; Bt × Bi = composite breed; Pn = proportion of polymorphic SNPs; He = gene diversity or heterozygosity; 10 kb = average r2 of all pairs of SNPs that are between 9.5 to 10.5 kb apart; Autos = autosomes; 70 kb = average r2 of all pairs of SNPs that are between 69.5 to 70.5 kb apart. All animals were genotyped using the BovineHD SNP chip (Illumina, San Diego; http://www.illumina.com/documents/products/datasheets/datasheet_bovineHD.pdf) that includes 777 962 markers. Quality control and imputation of missing data in the Australian sample followed the pipeline described by Bolormaa et al. [8]. Briefly, stringent filters were applied to each SNP (call rate, duplicated map position, extreme departure from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium), resulting in 729 068 informative SNPs. Missing genotypes were imputed within each breed type using 30 iterations of the BEAGLE software [9]. Genotypes for the same set of SNPs were extracted from the Bovine HapMap dataset [10] but missing genotypes were not imputed. LD between each pair of SNPs, measured as r2, which is less susceptible to bias due to differences in allelic frequency [4], and within-breed genetic diversity (heterozygosity and proportion of polymorphic SNPs) were calculated using PLINK v1.07 [11]. For the X chromosome, two scenarios were explored: one including all markers, and the second including only fairly polymorphic markers with a minor allele frequency (MAF) greater than 0.1 in all breeds.

Results and discussion

A high proportion of polymorphic markers was observed across all breeds, with the taurine breeds showing a slightly lower proportion (Pn ~ 0.86) than their indicine and composite counterparts (Pn ~ 1.00 for both) (Table  1). Heterozygozity (He) ranged from 0.25 (Brahman from the HapMap dataset and Shorthorn) to 0.35 (Tropical Composite). In general, the composite breeds showed higher He (0.34) than the taurine (0.28) and indicine breeds (0.26) because they originated from a mixture of both these types of cattle. The pattern of LD differed between breeds and the resulting decay curves could be grouped according to breed type (Figure  1 and Additional file 1: Figure S1). At short marker distances, indicine breeds had lower LD for autosomes compared to either the composite (intermediate) or taurine (highest) breeds. This is in agreement with previous studies [2,3], but the degree of variation fluctuates. When the distance between markers was 10 kb, the average observed LD (r2) for Brahman and Angus was 0.25 and 0.46, respectively (Table  1), which is equivalent to the LD reported for a comparable indicine cattle breed i.e. Nelore (0.27) [12], but higher than the value previously reported for Angus (0.35) [13]. This difference is not as clear for markers separated by a larger physical distance (> 70 kb) where LD quickly approached background levels, and r2 was ~ 0.10 in both studies and also in dairy breeds [6]. The average LD between unlinked markers (SNPs on different chromosomes) was at the background level or less across all breeds (see Additional file 2: Table S1) and was negatively correlated with sample size (Pearson correlation, r = -0.75). Indicine cattle continued to have a lower LD than most of the other breeds when the distances between markers were large, which suggests that they originated from a larger ancestral population.
Figure 1

Linkage disequilibrium (r) decay on beef cattle autosomes using a selection of Australian cattle breeds and HapMap samples. Additional file 1: Figure S1 discriminates each breed.

Linkage disequilibrium (r) decay on beef cattle autosomes using a selection of Australian cattle breeds and HapMap samples. Additional file 1: Figure S1 discriminates each breed. Analysis of LD across the bovine X chromosome (BTAX) revealed a different pattern to that observed for autosomes (Figure  2). The LD decay curves were still grouped by cattle type, however with a different ranking compared to what was observed for LD on autosomes. Over very short distances between markers on BTAX (< 5 kb), the indicine breeds still had the lowest average LD (r2 ~ 0.5) and the taurine breeds had the highest (r2 > 0.6). However, contrary to the pattern observed for autosomes, LD across BTAX decayed fastest in the taurine breeds, such that for marker pairs separated by 50 kb, the average LD was lower than that in either of the composite indicine populations (Figure  2A). The same LD patterns were observed when males only were evaluated (see Additional file 1: Figure S2). However, when only SNPs that were polymorphic for all breeds (MAF > 0.1) were used, the LD decay for BTAX became much more homogeneous across all breeds and, in fact, did not differ much from the results obtained for autosomes (Figure  2B). Because of the bottlenecks that cattle populations have experienced since their domestication and more recently during breed formation and because of the frequent intensive use of artificial insemination, it would be reasonable to expect extensive LD on BTAX. This expectation agrees with the LD decay observed for indicine and composite breeds when using all SNPs but not with the LD decay observed for all taurine breeds, nor for the LD decay observed for all breeds when only polymorphic SNPs were used. We speculate that the use of all markers inflated the LD observed for indicine and composite breeds (or biased the LD for taurine breeds downwards). However, the use of only polymorphic SNPs was too stringent and did not allow the analyses to capture the expected difference in LD on BTAX due to its unique inheritance.
Figure 2

Linkage disequilibrium (r) on the X chromosome of beef cattle using all SNPs (A) and only polymorphic SNPs in all breeds (B). MAF = minor allele frequency.

Linkage disequilibrium (r) on the X chromosome of beef cattle using all SNPs (A) and only polymorphic SNPs in all breeds (B). MAF = minor allele frequency. To assess whether the results obtained here were a specific feature of the Australian population, we repeated the analyses with an independent sample of Angus, Santa Gertrudis and Brahman animals from the Bovine HapMap dataset [3,10]. Results for all analyses on these populations showed high concordance with LD observed in the Australian populations for both the autosomes and BTAX (Figures  1 and 2).

Conclusions

Our results expand on previous studies of genome-wide LD in bovine populations. By using larger samples and a much higher density of markers than before and by exploring variation across autosomes and the X chromosome, we obtained an exponential increase in pair-wise LD comparisons, which allowed us to produce robust results. Because LD dropped below 0.2 at marker distances above 50 kb, we conclude that the availability of the HD chip enables detection of association signals that remained hidden when using lower density genotyping platforms.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

LRPN, AR and JWK planned the experiment. LRPN ran the analyses. LRPN, AR and JWK drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version.

Additional file 1: Figure S1

Linkage disequilibrium (r2) decay on beef cattle autosomes from the Australian sample. AA = Angus, BB = Brahman, TC = Tropical Composite, SG = Santa Gertrudis, BR = Belmont Red, HH = Hereford, LL = Limousin, SS = Shorthorn. Plot of the linkage disequilibrium (r2) decay on beef cattle autosomes from the Australian sample colour-coded per breed. Figure S2. Linkage disequilibrium (r2) decay on the X chromosome of male beef cattle only. AA = Angus, BB = Brahman, TC = Tropical Composite, SG = Santa Gertrudis, BR = Belmont Red, HH = Hereford, LL = Limousin, SS = Shorthorn. Plot of the linkage disequilibrium (r2) decay on the X chromosome of male beef cattle colour-coded per breed and cattle type. Click here for file

Additional file 2: Table S1

Average linkage disequilibrium (r2) between unlinked markers. About ~7 K SNPs were randomly sampled and linkage disequilibrium was calculated for SNP pairs on different chromosomes. Click here for file
  12 in total

1.  PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses.

Authors:  Shaun Purcell; Benjamin Neale; Kathe Todd-Brown; Lori Thomas; Manuel A R Ferreira; David Bender; Julian Maller; Pamela Sklar; Paul I W de Bakker; Mark J Daly; Pak C Sham
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Genome-wide linkage disequilibrium in the Blonde d'Aquitaine cattle breed.

Authors:  J Beghain; S Boitard; B Weiss; M Boussaha; I Gut; D Rocha
Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 2.380

3.  Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake and carcass and meat quality traits in Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and composite beef cattle.

Authors:  S Bolormaa; J E Pryce; K Kemper; K Savin; B J Hayes; W Barendse; Y Zhang; C M Reich; B A Mason; R J Bunch; B E Harrison; A Reverter; R M Herd; B Tier; H-U Graser; M E Goddard
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Linkage disequilibrium and persistence of phase in Holstein-Friesian, Jersey and Angus cattle.

Authors:  A P W de Roos; B J Hayes; R J Spelman; M E Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-07-13       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Genome-wide survey of SNP variation uncovers the genetic structure of cattle breeds.

Authors:  Richard A Gibbs; Jeremy F Taylor; Curtis P Van Tassell; William Barendse; Kellye A Eversole; Clare A Gill; Ronnie D Green; Debora L Hamernik; Steven M Kappes; Sigbjørn Lien; Lakshmi K Matukumalli; John C McEwan; Lynne V Nazareth; Robert D Schnabel; George M Weinstock; David A Wheeler; Paolo Ajmone-Marsan; Paul J Boettcher; Alexandre R Caetano; Jose Fernando Garcia; Olivier Hanotte; Paola Mariani; Loren C Skow; Tad S Sonstegard; John L Williams; Boubacar Diallo; Lemecha Hailemariam; Mario L Martinez; Chris A Morris; Luiz O C Silva; Richard J Spelman; Woudyalew Mulatu; Keyan Zhao; Colette A Abbey; Morris Agaba; Flábio R Araujo; Rowan J Bunch; James Burton; Chiara Gorni; Hanotte Olivier; Blair E Harrison; Bill Luff; Marco A Machado; Joel Mwakaya; Graham Plastow; Warren Sim; Timothy Smith; Merle B Thomas; Alessio Valentini; Paul Williams; James Womack; John A Woolliams; Yue Liu; Xiang Qin; Kim C Worley; Chuan Gao; Huaiyang Jiang; Stephen S Moore; Yanru Ren; Xing-Zhi Song; Carlos D Bustamante; Ryan D Hernandez; Donna M Muzny; Shobha Patil; Anthony San Lucas; Qing Fu; Matthew P Kent; Richard Vega; Aruna Matukumalli; Sean McWilliam; Gert Sclep; Katarzyna Bryc; Jungwoo Choi; Hong Gao; John J Grefenstette; Brenda Murdoch; Alessandra Stella; Rafael Villa-Angulo; Mark Wright; Jan Aerts; Oliver Jann; Riccardo Negrini; Mike E Goddard; Ben J Hayes; Daniel G Bradley; Marcos Barbosa da Silva; Lilian P L Lau; George E Liu; David J Lynn; Francesca Panzitta; Ken G Dodds
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Characteristics of linkage disequilibrium in North American Holsteins.

Authors:  Jarmila Bohmanova; Mehdi Sargolzaei; Flavio S Schenkel
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Genomic divergence of zebu and taurine cattle identified through high-density SNP genotyping.

Authors:  Laercio R Porto-Neto; Tad S Sonstegard; George E Liu; Derek M Bickhart; Marcos V B Da Silva; Marco A Machado; Yuri T Utsunomiya; Jose F Garcia; Cedric Gondro; Curtis P Van Tassell
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Study of whole genome linkage disequilibrium in Nellore cattle.

Authors:  Rafael Espigolan; Fernando Baldi; Arione A Boligon; Fabio Rp Souza; Daniel Gm Gordo; Rafael L Tonussi; Diércles F Cardoso; Henrique N Oliveira; Humberto Tonhati; Mehdi Sargolzaei; Flavio S Schenkel; Roberto Carvalheiro; Jesus A Ferro; Lucia G Albuquerque
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Whole genome linkage disequilibrium maps in cattle.

Authors:  Stephanie D McKay; Robert D Schnabel; Brenda M Murdoch; Lakshmi K Matukumalli; Jan Aerts; Wouter Coppieters; Denny Crews; Emmanuel Dias Neto; Clare A Gill; Chuan Gao; Hideyuki Mannen; Paul Stothard; Zhiquan Wang; Curt P Van Tassell; John L Williams; Jeremy F Taylor; Stephen S Moore
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 2.797

10.  Extent of genome-wide linkage disequilibrium in Australian Holstein-Friesian cattle based on a high-density SNP panel.

Authors:  Mehar S Khatkar; Frank W Nicholas; Andrew R Collins; Kyall R Zenger; Julie A L Cavanagh; Wes Barris; Robert D Schnabel; Jeremy F Taylor; Herman W Raadsma
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  37 in total

1.  Building a Calibration Set for Genomic Prediction, Characteristics to Be Considered, and Optimization Approaches.

Authors:  Simon Rio; Alain Charcosset; Tristan Mary-Huard; Laurence Moreau; Renaud Rincent
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

2.  Assessing genomic diversity and signatures of selection in Pinan cattle using whole-genome sequencing data.

Authors:  Shunjin Zhang; Zhi Yao; Xinmiao Li; Zijing Zhang; Xian Liu; Peng Yang; Ningbo Chen; Xiaoting Xia; Shijie Lyu; Qiaoting Shi; Eryao Wang; Baorui Ru; Yu Jiang; Chuzhao Lei; Hong Chen; Yongzhen Huang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 4.547

3.  A low-density SNP genotyping panel for the accurate prediction of cattle breeds.

Authors:  Antonio Reverter; Nicholas J Hudson; Sean McWilliam; Pamela A Alexandre; Yutao Li; Robert Barlow; Nina Welti; Hans Daetwyler; Laercio R Porto-Neto; Sonja Dominik
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Association analysis of loci implied in "buffering" epistasis.

Authors:  Antonio Reverter; Zulma G Vitezica; Marina Naval-Sánchez; John Henshall; Fernanda S S Raidan; Yutao Li; Karin Meyer; Nicholas J Hudson; Laercio R Porto-Neto; Andrés Legarra
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Population genetic structure, linkage disequilibrium and effective population size of conserved and extensively raised village chicken populations of Southern Africa.

Authors:  Khulekani S Khanyile; Edgar F Dzomba; Farai C Muchadeyi
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  Scanning and Filling: Ultra-Dense SNP Genotyping Combining Genotyping-By-Sequencing, SNP Array and Whole-Genome Resequencing Data.

Authors:  Davoud Torkamaneh; Francois Belzile
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Towards the identification of the loci of adaptive evolution.

Authors:  Carolina Pardo-Diaz; Camilo Salazar; Chris D Jiggins
Journal:  Methods Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 7.781

8.  Non-synonymous mutations mapped to chromosome X associated with andrological and growth traits in beef cattle.

Authors:  Gregório Miguel Ferreira de Camargo; Laercio R Porto-Neto; Matthew J Kelly; Rowan J Bunch; Sean M McWilliam; Humberto Tonhati; Sigrid A Lehnert; Marina R S Fortes; Stephen S Moore
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  The genetic architecture of climatic adaptation of tropical cattle.

Authors:  Laercio R Porto-Neto; Antonio Reverter; Kishore C Prayaga; Eva K F Chan; David J Johnston; Rachel J Hawken; Geoffry Fordyce; Jose Fernando Garcia; Tad S Sonstegard; Sunduimijid Bolormaa; Michael E Goddard; Heather M Burrow; John M Henshall; Sigrid A Lehnert; William Barendse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Genetics and genomics of disease resistance in salmonid species.

Authors:  José M Yáñez; Ross D Houston; Scott Newman
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 4.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.