Literature DB >> 33057688

A low-density SNP genotyping panel for the accurate prediction of cattle breeds.

Antonio Reverter1, Nicholas J Hudson2, Sean McWilliam1, Pamela A Alexandre1, Yutao Li1, Robert Barlow3, Nina Welti4, Hans Daetwyler5,6, Laercio R Porto-Neto1, Sonja Dominik7.   

Abstract

Genomic tools to better define breed composition in agriculturally important species have sparked scientific and commercial industry interest. Knowledge of breed composition can inform multiple scientifically important decisions of industry application including DNA marker-assisted selection, identification of signatures of selection, and inference of product provenance to improve supply chain integrity. Genomic tools are expensive but can be economized by deploying a relatively small number of highly informative single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) scattered evenly across the genome. Using resources from the 1000 Bull Genomes Project we established calibration (more stringent quality criteria; N = 1,243 cattle) and validation (less stringent; N = 864) data sets representing 17 breeds derived from both taurine and indicine bovine subspecies. Fifteen successively smaller panels (from 500,000 to 50 SNP) were built from those SNP in the calibration data that increasingly satisfied 2 criteria, high differential allele frequencies across the breeds as measured by average Euclidean distance (AED) and high uniformity (even spacing) across the physical genome. Those SNP awarded the highest AED were in or near genes previously identified as important signatures of selection in cattle such as LCORL, NCAPG, KITLG, and PLAG1. For each panel, the genomic breed composition (GBC) of each animal in the validation dataset was estimated using a linear regression model. A systematic exploration of the predictive accuracy of the various sized panels was then undertaken on the validation population using 3 benchmarking approaches: (1) % error (expressed relative to the estimated GBC made from over 1 million SNP), (2) % breed misassignment (expressed relative to each individual's breed recorded), and (3) Shannon's entropy of estimated GBC across the 17 target breeds. Our analyses suggest that a panel of just 250 SNP represents an adequate balance between accuracy and cost-only modest gains in accuracy are made as one increases panel density beyond this point.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  average Euclidean distance; cattle; genomic breed composition

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33057688      PMCID: PMC8202515          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  29 in total

1.  Predicting breed composition using breed frequencies of 50,000 markers from the US Meat Animal Research Center 2,000 Bull Project.

Authors:  L A Kuehn; J W Keele; G L Bennett; T G McDaneld; T P L Smith; W M Snelling; T S Sonstegard; R M Thallman
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Principal component analysis for selection of optimal SNP-sets that capture intragenic genetic variation.

Authors:  Benjamin D Horne; Nicola J Camp
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.135

3.  Genome-Wide Scan for Adaptive Divergence and Association with Population-Specific Covariates.

Authors:  Mathieu Gautier
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Variants modulating the expression of a chromosome domain encompassing PLAG1 influence bovine stature.

Authors:  Latifa Karim; Haruko Takeda; Li Lin; Tom Druet; Juan A C Arias; Denis Baurain; Nadine Cambisano; Stephen R Davis; Frédéric Farnir; Bernard Grisart; Bevin L Harris; Mike D Keehan; Mathew D Littlejohn; Richard J Spelman; Michel Georges; Wouter Coppieters
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-04-24       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Evaluation of developed low-density genotype panels for imputation to higher density in independent dairy and beef cattle populations.

Authors:  M M Judge; J F Kearney; M C McClure; R D Sleator; D P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Estimation of genomic breed composition of individual animals in composite beef cattle.

Authors:  Z Li; X-L Wu; W Guo; J He; H Li; G J M Rosa; D Gianola; R G Tait; J Parham; J Genho; T Schultz; S Bauck
Journal:  Anim Genet       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Estimation of Genomic Breed Composition for Purebred and Crossbred Animals Using Sparsely Regularized Admixture Models.

Authors:  Yangfan Wang; Xiao-Lin Wu; Zhi Li; Zhenmin Bao; Richard G Tait; Stewart Bauck; Guilherme J M Rosa
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  Rare variants in FANCA induce premature ovarian insufficiency.

Authors:  Xi Yang; Xiaojin Zhang; Jiao Jiao; Feng Zhang; Yuncheng Pan; Qiqi Wang; Qing Chen; Baozhu Cai; Shuyan Tang; Zixue Zhou; Siyuan Chen; Hao Yin; Wei Fu; Yang Luo; Da Li; Guoqing Li; Lingyue Shang; Jialing Yang; Li Jin; Qinghua Shi; Yanhua Wu
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Concordance rate between copy number variants detected using either high- or medium-density single nucleotide polymorphism genotype panels and the potential of imputing copy number variants from flanking high density single nucleotide polymorphism haplotypes in cattle.

Authors:  Pierce Rafter; Isobel Claire Gormley; Andrew C Parnell; John Francis Kearney; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.