Literature DB >> 24661245

Breast lesions: evaluation with shear wave elastography, with special emphasis on the "stiff rim" sign.

JianQiao Zhou1, WeiWei Zhan, Cai Chang, XiaoXiao Zhang, Yi Jia, YiJie Dong, Chun Zhou, Jing Sun, Edward G Grant.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze the diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography (SWE) in differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions, with special emphasis on the value of the "stiff rim" sign, as compared with conventional ultrasonography (US).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this ethics committee-approved retrospective study, all patients provided verbal informed consent for the analysis of their imaging data. A total of 193 consecutive women (age range, 18-82 years; mean age, 46 years) with 193 breast lesions (56 malignant, 137 benign) were included. The stiff rim sign, a qualitative SWE feature, was evaluated at the display setting of less than 180 kPa and at 180 kPa. The quantitative SWE features were assessed. Sensitivity, specificity, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az), and positive and negative likelihood ratios were calculated for conventional US features, for SWE features, and for combined conventional US and SWE features.
RESULTS: Among all qualitative and quantitative SWE features, the stiff rim sign at the display setting (<180 kPa) showed the highest Az (0.918; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.870, 0.953), which was comparable to that for conventional US (0.891; 95% CI: 0.838, 0.931) (P = .40). The combination of the stiff rim sign at less than 180 kPa and conventional US features, with a positive likelihood ratio of 12.23 (95% CI: 11.5, 13.0) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.02 (95% CI: 0.003, 0.1), yielded the highest Az (0.982; 95% CI: 0.951, 0.995)-higher than those for conventional US only and for any single SWE feature alone (P < .001 for all)-and yielded higher sensitivity (98.2% [55 of 56]; 95% CI: 90.4%, 100.0%) and similar specificity (92.0% [126 of 137]; 95% CI: 86.1%, 95.9%) compared with conventional US (P < .001 and P = .58, respectively). With use of this combination, the rate of recommendation of benign lesions for interventional procedures would decrease from 56.9% (78 of 137) (on the basis of conventional US features) to 15.3% (21 of 137), and 100.0% (56 of 56) (95% CI: 93.6%, 100.0%) malignant lesions would be correctly selected for biopsy.
CONCLUSION: Adding SWE features, especially the stiff rim sign at the display setting (<180 kPa), to conventional US has the potential to improve the differentiation of breast lesions. © RSNA, 2014.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24661245     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14130818

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  32 in total

1.  Combination of two-dimensional shear wave elastography with ultrasound breast imaging reporting and data system in the diagnosis of breast lesions: a new method to increase the diagnostic performance.

Authors:  Dan-Dan Li; Hui-Xiong Xu; Le-Hang Guo; Xiao-Wan Bo; Xiao-Long Li; Rong Wu; Jun-Mei Xu; Yi-Feng Zhang; Kun Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Combining Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging and BI-RADS May Improve Solid Breast Lesion Evaluation.

Authors:  Size Wu; Xiaojing Cui; Li Huang; Xuefei Bai
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Mechanical characterization of functionally graded soft materials with ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  Guo-Yang Li; Zhao-Yi Zhang; Jialin Qian; Yang Zheng; Wenli Liu; Huijuan Wu; Yanping Cao
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Quantitative analysis of shear wave elastic heterogeneity for prediction of lymphovascular invasion in breast cancer.

Authors:  Yini Huang; Yubo Liu; Yun Wang; Xueyi Zheng; Jing Han; Qian Li; Yixin Hu; Rushuang Mao; Jianhua Zhou
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Usefulness of new shear wave elastography in early predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with breast cancer: where and when to measure is optimal?

Authors:  Jiong-Hui Gu; Chang He; Qi-Yu Zhao; Tian-An Jiang
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 3.307

6.  Diagnostic performance of qualitative and quantitative shear wave elastography in differentiating malignant from benign breast masses, and association with the histological prognostic factors.

Authors:  Voraparee Suvannarerg; Piyanuch Chitchumnong; Wipawan Apiwat; Lassanun Lertdamrongdej; Nattinee Tretipwanit; Pongthep Pisarnturakit; Panitta Sitthinamsuwan; Shanigarn Thiravit; Kobkun Muangsomboon; Pornpim Korpraphong
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-03

7.  BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: could multi-mode ultrasound be helpful for their diagnosis?

Authors:  Gang Liu; Meng-Ke Zhang; Yan He; Yuan Liu; Xi-Ru Li; Zhi-Li Wang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-06

8.  Assessment of perinodular stiffness in differentiating malignant from benign thyroid nodules.

Authors:  Lei Hu; Xiao Liu; Chong Pei; Li Xie; Nianan He
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 3.335

9.  Application of 3D and 2D quantitative shear wave elastography (SWE) to differentiate between benign and malignant breast masses.

Authors:  Jie Tian; Qianqi Liu; Xi Wang; Ping Xing; Zhuowen Yang; Changjun Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  TGF-β1: is it related to the stiffness of breast lesions and can it predict axillary lymph node metastasis?

Authors:  Meng Ke Zhang; Qiu Jing Shang; Shi Yu Li; Bo Wang; Gang Liu; Zhi Li Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.