Jiong-Hui Gu1, Chang He1, Qi-Yu Zhao1, Tian-An Jiang2. 1. Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310003, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China. 2. Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310003, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China. tiananjiang@zju.edu.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnosis performance of new shear wave elastography (sound touch elastography, STE) in the prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) response at an early stage in breast cancer patients and to determine the optimal measurement locations around the lesion in different ranges. METHODS: One hundred and eight patients were analyzed in this prospective study from November 2018 to December 2020. All patients completed NAC treatment and underwent STE examination at three time points [the day before NAC (t0); the day before the second course (t1); the day before third course (t2)]. The stiffness of the whole lesion (G), 1-mm shell (S1) and 2-mm shell (S2) around the lesion was expressed by STE parameters. The relative changes (∆stiffness) of STE parameters after the first and second course of NAC were calculated and shown as the variables [Δ(t1) and Δ(t2)]. The diagnostic accuracy of STE was evaluated by means of receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: The ∆stiffness (%) including ∆Gmean(t2), ∆S1mean(t2) and ∆S2mean(t2) all showed significant differences between pathological complete response (pCR) and non-pCR groups. ∆S2mean(t2) displayed the best predictive performance for pCR (AUC = 0.842) with an ideal ∆stiffness threshold value - 26%. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring the relative changes in the stiffness of surrounding tissue or entire lesion with STE holds promise for effectively predicting the response to NAC at its early stage for breast cancer patients and ∆stiffness of shell 2 mm after the second course of NAC may be a potential prediction parameter.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnosis performance of new shear wave elastography (sound touch elastography, STE) in the prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) response at an early stage in breast cancer patients and to determine the optimal measurement locations around the lesion in different ranges. METHODS: One hundred and eight patients were analyzed in this prospective study from November 2018 to December 2020. All patients completed NAC treatment and underwent STE examination at three time points [the day before NAC (t0); the day before the second course (t1); the day before third course (t2)]. The stiffness of the whole lesion (G), 1-mm shell (S1) and 2-mm shell (S2) around the lesion was expressed by STE parameters. The relative changes (∆stiffness) of STE parameters after the first and second course of NAC were calculated and shown as the variables [Δ(t1) and Δ(t2)]. The diagnostic accuracy of STE was evaluated by means of receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: The ∆stiffness (%) including ∆Gmean(t2), ∆S1mean(t2) and ∆S2mean(t2) all showed significant differences between pathological complete response (pCR) and non-pCR groups. ∆S2mean(t2) displayed the best predictive performance for pCR (AUC = 0.842) with an ideal ∆stiffness threshold value - 26%. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring the relative changes in the stiffness of surrounding tissue or entire lesion with STE holds promise for effectively predicting the response to NAC at its early stage for breast cancer patients and ∆stiffness of shell 2 mm after the second course of NAC may be a potential prediction parameter.
Authors: José Baselga; Mario Campone; Martine Piccart; Howard A Burris; Hope S Rugo; Tarek Sahmoud; Shinzaburo Noguchi; Michael Gnant; Kathleen I Pritchard; Fabienne Lebrun; J Thaddeus Beck; Yoshinori Ito; Denise Yardley; Ines Deleu; Alejandra Perez; Thomas Bachelot; Luc Vittori; Zhiying Xu; Pabak Mukhopadhyay; David Lebwohl; Gabriel N Hortobagyi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-12-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Wen Li; Vignesh Arasu; David C Newitt; Ella F Jones; Lisa Wilmes; Jessica Gibbs; John Kornak; Bonnie N Joe; Laura J Esserman; Nola M Hylton Journal: Tomography Date: 2016-12
Authors: Dong Ho Lee; Eun Sun Lee; Jae Young Lee; Jae Seok Bae; Haeryoung Kim; Kyung Bun Lee; Su Jong Yu; Eun Ju Cho; Jeong Hoon Lee; Young Youn Cho; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2020-07-27 Impact factor: 3.500
Authors: D Junker; T De Zordo; M Quentin; M Ladurner; J Bektic; W Horniger; W Jaschke; F Aigner Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-05-22 Impact factor: 3.411