Literature DB >> 24660075

A Paternally Inherited BRCA1 Mutation Associated with an Unusual Aggressive Clinical Phenotype.

Florentia Fostira1, Nikolaos Tsoukalas2, Irene Konstantopoulou1, Vassilios Georgoulias3, Charalambos Christophyllakis2, Drakoulis Yannoukakos2.   

Abstract

This report highlights the necessity of genetic testing, at least for BRCA1 mutations, of young females diagnosed with triple negative breast cancer, even in the absence of or limited family history. A 34-year-old female with a locally advanced, triple negative tumour, which perforated the skin, is described. At the time of diagnosis, the patient had already multiple lung metastases and although chemotherapy was started immediately, she died with rapid systemic disease progression. The patient was found to carry the BRCA1 p.E1060X mutation, which is located on exon 11 of the gene. The high penetrance of BRCA1 gene is not represented in the patient's family, since the mutation was paternally inherited. It is evident that females belonging to small families, along with paternal inheritance of pathogenic BRCA mutations that predispose for breast cancer, in most cases will probably be genetically tested only after being diagnosed with cancer.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24660075      PMCID: PMC3934306          DOI: 10.1155/2014/875029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Case Rep Genet        ISSN: 2090-6552


1. Introduction

BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing has been available in the clinic at least for the past decade, allowing the characterization of people that face an increased breast and ovarian cancer risk. Although the selection criteria for genetic testing are quite established, many times the small size of the family or the paternal inheritance of the pathogenic BRCA mutation can be misleading when referring patients. Therefore, loss-of-function mutations can be genetically transmitted from male BRCA mutation carriers, who can be in many cases cancer-free, to their daughters, who will have a lifetime breast cancer risk that can be as high as 84% [1-3]. Estimated lifetime breast cancer risk for male BRCA2 carriers is approximately 8% [4], while there is high relative risk for pancreatic and prostate cancer, when compared to the general population [5]. On the contrary, relative and cumulative cancer risks are much lower in male BRCA1 carriers [6]. Since our current knowledge is advanced on understanding the cancer predisposition of mutation carriers, it seems rather important to successfully identify these individuals in order to offer appropriate clinical management.

2. Case Report

A 34-year-old premenopausal female with a locally advanced tumour presented as a dirty ulcer, perforating the skin, in her right breast is described. Biopsies of the damaged tissue showed an invasive, grade III ductal carcinoma, with areas of papillary shaping, areas of necrosis, and invasion of the skin. The breast tumour was classified as triple negative, since there was a lack of estrogen and progesterone receptor expression and absence of HER2 oncoprotein after immunohistochemical staining. Staging revealed multiple lung metastases and enlargement of right axillary lymph nodes. Consequently, she was diagnosed with a stage IV infiltrating ductal cancer in her right breast which was triple negative and grade III. The patient was started on first line chemotherapy with the regimen carboplatin 2AUC and paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly plus bevacizumab 10 mg/Kgr on days 1 and 15. Initially she had a partial response to this treatment. However, her disease relapsed and she started on second line chemotherapy with the regimen docetaxel 75 mg/m2, adriamycin 60 mg/m2, and cytoxan 600 mg/m2 every 21 days. She received only two cycles of this chemotherapy because she was admitted to hospital due to multiple brain metastases. She was administered whole brain radiotherapy with minimal improvement of her clinical symptoms. Taking into account the triple negative, along with the BRCA1 mutation status, the patient was considered as a candidate for entering a clinical trial with PARP inhibitors. Unfortunately, due to a rapid systemic disease progression the patient finally passed away a month later and therefore did not receive any further treatment. The proband had limited family history of breast or ovarian cancer. It is noteworthy that the family was rather small (Figure 1). Her grandmother from her father's side was diagnosed with breast cancer and died at her early fifties. The other reported cancer in her first degree relatives is the prostate cancer diagnosed in her father when he was 72. He underwent prostatectomy for prostate cancer, due to his elevated PSA value (7 ng/mL). The histology report revealed the existence of a low differentiated adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland with Gleason's pattern 7 (4+3). Also there were some areas with high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN). The stage of the disease was T3bN0M0. Consequently, he was diagnosed with a high risk prostate cancer based on T3b. Initially, he received radiotherapy and hormonal therapy with LHRH analogue and specifically triptoreline and antiandrogen (bicalutamide).
Figure 1

Pedigree of the family where the BRCA1 mutation p.E1060X (c.3178G>T) was identified. The proband is highlighted by the arrow.

Many research groups have reported that BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers are more likely to develop a more aggressive prostate cancer phenotype, generally associated with a higher probability of nodal involvement, distant metastasis, and low grade tumours [7, 8]. This observation is consistent with this case. Due to the early age of breast cancer diagnosis, along with the distinct immunophenotype, the patient fulfilled the updated NCCN guidelines (http://www.nccn.org/) and was therefore tested for deleterious mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. The direct relationship between BRCA1 mutations and triple negative breast cancer has been widely assessed in Greek patients [9]. Direct Sanger sequencing revealed the nonsense mutation p.E1060X (c.3178G>T), which is located on exon 11 of the BRCA1 gene. This is a rare, to the Greek population, mutation. The proband's father was tested to be the mutation carrier, while the proband's sister (cancer free at the age of 45) did not carry the damaging allele.

3. Discussion

This case report highlights the necessity of genetic testing even when family history is not prominent, at least for BRCA1 mutations, of young females diagnosed with triple negative breast cancer. Individuals belonging in small families in combination with paternal inheritance of pathogenic mutations can remain undiagnosed. Some recent research studies indicate that females with paternally inherited mutations in BRCA gene mutations develop breast cancer at younger age when compared to women who inherit the gene mutations from their mothers. This can be partially explained by different imprinting patterns in maternal and paternal chromosomes and more specifically in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 locus [10]. We report this case as it highlights the importance of careful selection of individuals for genetic testing. The necessity for identification of mutation carriers is enlarged since there are promising, targeted therapies for BRCA1 carriers, such as PARP inhibitors.
  10 in total

1.  BRCA1, BRCA2 and CHEK2 c.1100 delC mutations in patients with double primaries of the breasts and/or ovaries.

Authors:  D Gareth Evans; Munaza Ahmed; Stuart Bayliss; Emma Howard; Fiona Lalloo; Andrew Wallace
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case Series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies.

Authors:  A Antoniou; P D P Pharoah; S Narod; H A Risch; J E Eyfjord; J L Hopper; N Loman; H Olsson; O Johannsson; A Borg; B Pasini; P Radice; S Manoukian; D M Eccles; N Tang; E Olah; H Anton-Culver; E Warner; J Lubinski; J Gronwald; B Gorski; H Tulinius; S Thorlacius; H Eerola; H Nevanlinna; K Syrjäkoski; O-P Kallioniemi; D Thompson; C Evans; J Peto; F Lalloo; D G Evans; D F Easton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Prevalence of BRCA1 mutations among 403 women with triple-negative breast cancer: implications for genetic screening selection criteria: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group Study.

Authors:  Florentia Fostira; Marianthi Tsitlaidou; Christos Papadimitriou; Maroulio Pertesi; Eleni Timotheadou; Alexandra V Stavropoulou; Stavros Glentis; Evangelos Bournakis; Mattheos Bobos; Dimitrios Pectasides; Pavlos Papakostas; George Pentheroudakis; Helen Gogas; Pantelis Skarlos; Epaminontas Samantas; Dimitrios Bafaloukos; Paris A Kosmidis; Angelos Koutras; Drakoulis Yannoukakos; Irene Konstantopoulou; George Fountzilas
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.

Authors:  D Ford; D F Easton; M Stratton; S Narod; D Goldgar; P Devilee; D T Bishop; B Weber; G Lenoir; J Chang-Claude; H Sobol; M D Teare; J Struewing; A Arason; S Scherneck; J Peto; T R Rebbeck; P Tonin; S Neuhausen; R Barkardottir; J Eyfjord; H Lynch; B A Ponder; S A Gayther; M Zelada-Hedman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Targeted prostate cancer screening in men with mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 detects aggressive prostate cancer: preliminary analysis of the results of the IMPACT study.

Authors:  Anita V Mitra; Elizabeth K Bancroft; Yolanda Barbachano; Elizabeth C Page; C S Foster; C Jameson; G Mitchell; G J Lindeman; A Stapleton; G Suthers; D G Evans; D Cruger; I Blanco; C Mercer; J Kirk; L Maehle; S Hodgson; L Walker; L Izatt; F Douglas; K Tucker; H Dorkins; V Clowes; A Male; A Donaldson; C Brewer; R Doherty; B Bulman; P J Osther; M Salinas; D Eccles; K Axcrona; I Jobson; B Newcombe; C Cybulski; W S Rubinstein; S Buys; S Townshend; E Friedman; S Domchek; T Ramon Y Cajal; A Spigelman; S H Teo; N Nicolai; N Aaronson; A Ardern-Jones; C Bangma; D Dearnaley; J Eyfjord; A Falconer; H Grönberg; F Hamdy; O Johannsson; V Khoo; Z Kote-Jarai; H Lilja; J Lubinski; J Melia; C Moynihan; S Peock; G Rennert; F Schröder; P Sibley; M Suri; P Wilson; Y J Bignon; S Strom; M Tischkowitz; A Liljegren; D Ilencikova; A Abele; K Kyriacou; C van Asperen; L Kiemeney; D F Easton; Rosalind A Eeles
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Parental origin of mutation and the risk of breast cancer in a prospective study of women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

Authors:  N Senst; M Llacuachaqui; J Lubinski; H Lynch; S Armel; S Neuhausen; P Ghadirian; P Sun; S A Narod
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 4.438

7.  Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Authors:  Mary-Claire King; Joan H Marks; Jessica B Mandell
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-10-24       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Cancer risks for male carriers of germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Alexander Liede; Beth Y Karlan; Steven A Narod
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Breast cancer risk among male BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Yu Chuan Tai; Susan Domchek; Giovanni Parmigiani; Sining Chen
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Germline BRCA mutations are associated with higher risk of nodal involvement, distant metastasis, and poor survival outcomes in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Elena Castro; Chee Goh; David Olmos; Ed Saunders; Daniel Leongamornlert; Malgorzata Tymrakiewicz; Nadiya Mahmud; Tokhir Dadaev; Koveela Govindasami; Michelle Guy; Emma Sawyer; Rosemary Wilkinson; Audrey Ardern-Jones; Steve Ellis; Debra Frost; Susan Peock; D Gareth Evans; Marc Tischkowitz; Trevor Cole; Rosemarie Davidson; Diana Eccles; Carole Brewer; Fiona Douglas; Mary E Porteous; Alan Donaldson; Huw Dorkins; Louise Izatt; Jackie Cook; Shirley Hodgson; M John Kennedy; Lucy E Side; Jacqueline Eason; Alex Murray; Antonis C Antoniou; Douglas F Easton; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Rosalind Eeles
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 44.544

  10 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances of therapeutic targets based on the molecular signature in breast cancer: genetic mutations and implications for current treatment paradigms.

Authors:  Zeinab Safarpour Lima; Mostafa Ghadamzadeh; Farzad Tahmasebi Arashloo; Ghazaleh Amjad; Mohammad Reza Ebadi; Ladan Younesi
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 17.388

2.  A Novel BRCA1 Gene Mutation Detected With Breast Cancer in a Vietnamese Family by Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing: A Case Report.

Authors:  Tran Van Thuan; Nguyen Van Chu; Pham Hong Khoa; Nguyen Tien Quang; Dao Van Tu; Nguyen Thi Quynh Tho; Phung Thi Huyen; Bui Hai Ha; Pham Thi Han; Duong Minh Long; Bach Thi Hoai Phuong
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2020-01-17

3.  Cumulative BRCA mutation analysis in the Greek population confirms that homogenous ethnic background facilitates genetic testing.

Authors:  Alexandra Tsigginou; Fotios Vlachopoulos; Iordanis Arzimanoglou; Flora Zagouri; Constantine Dimitrakakis
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.857

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.