Literature DB >> 22434525

Prevalence of BRCA1 mutations among 403 women with triple-negative breast cancer: implications for genetic screening selection criteria: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group Study.

Florentia Fostira1, Marianthi Tsitlaidou, Christos Papadimitriou, Maroulio Pertesi, Eleni Timotheadou, Alexandra V Stavropoulou, Stavros Glentis, Evangelos Bournakis, Mattheos Bobos, Dimitrios Pectasides, Pavlos Papakostas, George Pentheroudakis, Helen Gogas, Pantelis Skarlos, Epaminontas Samantas, Dimitrios Bafaloukos, Paris A Kosmidis, Angelos Koutras, Drakoulis Yannoukakos, Irene Konstantopoulou, George Fountzilas.   

Abstract

In spite the close association of the triple-negative breast cancer immunophenotype with hereditary breast cancers and the BRCA1 pathway, there is a lack of population studies that determine the frequency of BRCA1 mutations among triple-negative breast cancer patients. To address this, we have screened a large sample of 403 women diagnosed with triple-negative invasive breast cancer, independently of their age or family history, for germline BRCA1 mutations. Median age at diagnosis was 50 years (range 20-83). The overall prevalence of triple-negative cases among the initial patient group with invasive breast cancer was 8%. BRCA1 was screened by direct DNA sequencing in all patients, including all exons where a mutation was previously found in the Greek population (exons 5, 11, 12, 16, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24-77% of the BRCA1 coding region), including diagnostic PCRs to detect the three Greek founder large genomic rearrangements. Sixty-five deleterious BRCA1 mutations were identified among the 403 triple-negative breast cancer patients (16%). Median age of onset for mutation carriers was 39 years. Among a total of 106 women with early-onset triple-negative breast cancer (<40 years), 38 (36%) had a BRCA1 mutation, while 27% of women with triple-negative breast cancer diagnosed before 50 years (56/208) had a BRCA1 mutation. A mutation was found in 48% (50/105) of the triple-negative breast cancer patients with family history of breast or ovarian cancer. It is noteworthy, however, that of the 65 carriers, 15 (23%) had no reported family history of related cancers. All but one of the carriers had grade III tumors (98%). These results indicate that women with early-onset triple-negative breast cancer, and ideally all triple-negative breast cancer patients, are candidates for BRCA1 genetic testing even in the absence of a family history of breast or ovarian cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22434525     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-2021-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  30 in total

1.  Cancer Survivorship Care: An Opportunity to Revisit Cancer Genetics.

Authors:  Kathryn J Ruddy; Betsy C Risendal; Judy E Garber; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Current condition of genetic medicine for hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  Hiroko Terui-Kohbata; Masayuki Yoshida
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-05-12

3.  Investigation of the significance of population-based breast cancer screening among women aged under 40 years.

Authors:  Mai Okazaki; Hiroko Bando; Eriko Tohno; Yuka Kujiraoka; Akiko Iguchi-Manaka; Emika Ichioka; Yukiko Tsushima; Hiroshi Watanabe; Hisato Hara
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 4.239

4.  Significant clinical impact of recurrent BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Mexico.

Authors:  Cynthia Villarreal-Garza; Rosa María Alvarez-Gómez; Carlos Pérez-Plasencia; Luis A Herrera; Josef Herzog; Danielle Castillo; Alejandro Mohar; Clementina Castro; Lenny N Gallardo; Dolores Gallardo; Miguel Santibáñez; Kathleen R Blazer; Jeffrey N Weitzel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Clinical application of circulating tumor DNA in breast cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey Chun Hin Chan; James Chung Hang Chow; Connie Hoi Man Ho; Therese Yue Man Tsui; William C Cho
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  The fate of BRCA1-related germline mutations in triple-negative breast tumors.

Authors:  Vassiliki Kotoula; Florentia Fostira; Kyriaki Papadopoulou; Paraskevi Apostolou; Eleftheria Tsolaki; Georgios Lazaridis; Kyriaki Manoussou; Flora Zagouri; Dimitrios Pectasides; Ioannis Vlachos; Ioannis Tikas; Sotiris Lakis; Irene Konstantopoulou; George Pentheroudakis; Helen Gogas; Pavlos Papakostas; Christos Christodoulou; Dimitrios Bafaloukos; Evangelia Razis; Vasilios Karavasilis; Christina Bamias; Drakoulis Yannoukakos; George Fountzilas
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 6.166

7.  Rate of BRCA mutation in patients tested under NCCN genetic testing criteria.

Authors:  Anna C Beck; Haimiao Yuan; Junlin Liao; Pamela Imperiale; Krysten Shipley; Lillian M Erdahl; Sonia L Sugg; Ronald J Weigel; Ingrid M Lizarraga
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  The repertoire of somatic genetic alterations of acinic cell carcinomas of the breast: an exploratory, hypothesis-generating study.

Authors:  Elena Guerini-Rocco; Zsolt Hodi; Salvatore Piscuoglio; Charlotte K Y Ng; Emad A Rakha; Anne M Schultheis; Caterina Marchiò; Arnaud da Cruz Paula; Maria R De Filippo; Luciano G Martelotto; Leticia De Mattos-Arruda; Marcia Edelweiss; Achim A Jungbluth; Nicola Fusco; Larry Norton; Britta Weigelt; Ian O Ellis; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 7.996

Review 9.  Problematic breast tumors reassessed in light of novel molecular data.

Authors:  Fresia Pareja; Britta Weigelt; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 7.842

10.  The Microbiome and Cancer: Is the 'Oncobiome' Mirage Real?

Authors:  Ryan M Thomas; Christian Jobin
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2015-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.