OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of targeted prostate cancer screening in men with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, an international study, IMPACT (Identification of Men with a genetic predisposition to ProstAte Cancer: Targeted screening in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and controls), was established. This is the first multicentre screening study targeted at men with a known genetic predisposition to prostate cancer. A preliminary analysis of the data is reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men aged 40-69 years from families with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations were offered annual prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing, and those with PSA > 3 ng/mL, were offered a prostate biopsy. Controls were men age-matched (± 5 years) who were negative for the familial mutation. RESULTS: In total, 300 men were recruited (205 mutation carriers; 89 BRCA1, 116 BRCA2 and 95 controls) over 33 months. At the baseline screen (year 1), 7.0% (21/300) underwent a prostate biopsy. Prostate cancer was diagnosed in ten individuals, a prevalence of 3.3%. The positive predictive value of PSA screening in this cohort was 47·6% (10/21). One prostate cancer was diagnosed at year 2. Of the 11 prostate cancers diagnosed, nine were in mutation carriers, two in controls, and eight were clinically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that the positive predictive value of PSA screening in BRCA mutation carriers is high and that screening detects clinically significant prostate cancer. These results support the rationale for continued screening in such men.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of targeted prostate cancer screening in men with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, an international study, IMPACT (Identification of Men with a genetic predisposition to ProstAte Cancer: Targeted screening in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and controls), was established. This is the first multicentre screening study targeted at men with a known genetic predisposition to prostate cancer. A preliminary analysis of the data is reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men aged 40-69 years from families with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations were offered annual prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing, and those with PSA > 3 ng/mL, were offered a prostate biopsy. Controls were men age-matched (± 5 years) who were negative for the familial mutation. RESULTS: In total, 300 men were recruited (205 mutation carriers; 89 BRCA1, 116 BRCA2 and 95 controls) over 33 months. At the baseline screen (year 1), 7.0% (21/300) underwent a prostate biopsy. Prostate cancer was diagnosed in ten individuals, a prevalence of 3.3%. The positive predictive value of PSA screening in this cohort was 47·6% (10/21). One prostate cancer was diagnosed at year 2. Of the 11 prostate cancers diagnosed, nine were in mutation carriers, two in controls, and eight were clinically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that the positive predictive value of PSA screening in BRCA mutation carriers is high and that screening detects clinically significant prostate cancer. These results support the rationale for continued screening in such men.
Authors: Renske Postma; Fritz H Schröder; Geert J L H van Leenders; Robert F Hoedemaeker; Andre N Vis; Monique J Roobol; Theodorus H van der Kwast Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2007-01-16 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: K L Nastiuk; M Mansukhani; M B Terry; P Kularatne; M A Rubin; J Melamed; M D Gammon; M Ittmann; J J Krolewski Journal: Prostate Date: 1999-08-01 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Masood A Khan; Alan W Partin; Harry G Rittenhouse; Stephen D Mikolajczyk; Lori J Sokoll; Daniel W Chan; Robert W Veltri Journal: J Urol Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: J Melia; D Dearnaley; S Moss; L Johns; P Coulson; C Moynihan; J Sweetman; M C Parkinson; R Eeles; M Watson Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2006-02-27 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Jennifer J Johnston; Wendy S Rubinstein; Flavia M Facio; David Ng; Larry N Singh; Jamie K Teer; James C Mullikin; Leslie G Biesecker Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2012-06-14 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Kristi D Graves; Rhoda Gatammah; Beth N Peshkin; Ayelet Krieger; Christy Gell; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Marc D Schwartz Journal: Fam Cancer Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Michael R Burgio; John P A Ioannidis; Brett M Kaminski; Eric Derycke; Scott Rogers; Muin J Khoury; Daniela Seminara Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2013-09-17 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Nassim Taherian; Nancy Hamel; Louis R Bégin; Tarek A Bismar; David E Goldgar; Bing-Jian Feng; William D Foulkes Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2013-01-15 Impact factor: 14.432
Authors: Tuya Pal; Susan Vadaparampil; Jongphil Kim; Yan Xu; Sue Friedman; Steven A Narod; Kelly Metcalfe Journal: Fam Cancer Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 2.375