Literature DB >> 24659427

Mismatch of AO anatomically shaped distal humeral plate with humeral shaft forward flexion angulation in adult Chinese population.

Zhiyong Zhou1, Zhifeng Tang, Xueqin Zhao, Wentao Chen, Xu Chen, Mingzhang Mu, Shudong Zhang, Bin Ning, Tanghong Jia.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: LCP extra-articular distal humerus plate (LCPEA) designed by AO has been introduced as an anatomically shaped plate that improves the results of surgical fixation in extra-articular distal humeral shaft fractures. However, no study analyzed whether LCPEA matches humeral shaft forward flexion angulation (FFA).
OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to evaluate the morphological discrepancies between LCPEA and the humeral shaft FFA in Chinese cadaveric dried adult humeri and to propose a further design of pre-contoured plates to accommodate the FFA.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-four Chinese cadaveric dried adult humeri were used for this study. An eight-hole LCPEA was applied to the posterior aspect of the distal humerus according to the contour. Mismatches between the bone and the plate were recorded. The distance between the inner surface of the plate and the underlying humeral dorsal cortex was measured at the sites of mismatch. The humeral shaft FFA was measured from the intersection angle between tangent lines placed on the dorsal aspect of the 1/3 distal humeral shaft and the dorsal ridge of the 2/3 proximal humeral shaft. The location of the apex of the FFA was determined by measuring the distance from the most distal point of trochlea of humerus to the point of intersection of the FFA tangent lines. The distance was defined as forward flexion distance (FFD).
RESULTS: Mismatch was found at the level of proximal 3-6 holes of LCPEA with an average distance of 6.9 ± 3.1 mm (range 2.3-14.0 mm) at the tip of the plate. The FFA was present in all specimens. The average FFA was 8.2° ± 2.2° (range 4°-13°), the average FFD was 99.9 ± 9.6 mm (range 79.2-117.9 mm), and the average ratio of FFD to humerus length was 0.33 ± 0.03 (range 0.27-0.39).
CONCLUSIONS: A rather consistent pattern of mismatch was found at the proximal part of LCPEA. An attempt to fit the plate to the bone at this level may cause a gap of the fracture at the opposite cortex. The main reason for the mismatch is the existence of the humeral shaft FFA. LCPEA is usually made a bend of about 8° between the fourth and the fifth dynamic-compression portion of the combination hole in the distal-to-proximal direction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24659427     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-014-1431-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  12 in total

1.  A morphometric study on the humerus for intramedullary fixation.

Authors:  Fuat Akpinar; Atif Aydinlioğlu; Nihat Tosun; Ali Doğan; Ibrahim Tuncay; Ozkan Unal
Journal:  Tohoku J Exp Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.848

2.  Dual plating for fractures of the distal third of the humeral shaft.

Authors:  Mark L Prasarn; Jaimo Ahn; Omesh Paul; Elizabeth M Morris; Stephen P Kalandiak; David L Helfet; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.512

3.  An alternative method of osteosynthesis for distal humeral shaft fractures.

Authors:  Jonathan C Levy; Steven P Kalandiak; James J Hutson; Gregory Zych
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 4.  Humeral shaft fractures: a review.

Authors:  Matt Walker; Brian Palumbo; Brian Badman; Jordan Brooks; Jeffrey Van Gelderen; Mark Mighell
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Modified lateral approach to the distal humerus for internal fixation.

Authors:  M C Moran
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: when does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability?

Authors:  M Ahmad; R Nanda; A S Bajwa; J Candal-Couto; S Green; A C Hui
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 2.586

7.  Fractures of the shaft of the humerus. An epidemiological study of 401 fractures.

Authors:  R Ekholm; J Adami; J Tidermark; K Hansson; H Törnkvist; S Ponzer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-11

8.  Fixation of extra-articular distal humerus fractures using one locking plate versus two reconstruction plates: a laboratory study.

Authors:  Nirmal C Tejwani; Anjali Murthy; Jason Park; Toni M McLaurin; Kenneth A Egol; Fred J Kummer
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2009-03

9.  AO extra-articular distal humerus locking plate: extended spectrum of usage in intra-articular distal fractures with metaphyseal extension--our experience with 20 cases.

Authors:  Sameer Aggarwal; Vishal Kumar; Kishan R Bhagwat; Prateek Behera
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-04-07

Review 10.  Locking plates: tips and tricks.

Authors:  Wade R Smith; Bruce H Ziran; Jeffrey O Anglen; Philip F Stahel
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2008
View more
  2 in total

1.  Risk factors for hardware-related complications after extra-articular distal humerus fracture fixation using an anatomical locking plate.

Authors:  Hyoung-Seok Jung; Yoo-Sun Won; Yang-Seon Choi; Jae-Sung Lee
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Functional and Radiological Outcome in Distal Third Humerus Fracture Treated with Extra-articular Locking Plate: A Multicentric Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Ashis Kumar Gupta; Barada Prasanna Samal; Tushar Ranjan Dalei
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-11-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.