Literature DB >> 24659170

Task predictability influences the variable foreperiod effect: evidence of task-specific temporal preparation.

Hannes Schröter, Teresa Birngruber, Daniel Bratzke, Jeff Miller, Rolf Ulrich.   

Abstract

Temporal preparation usually results in enhanced performance in choice reaction time tasks. The present study investigated to what extent temporal preparation involves increased readiness for task-specific processing requirements as opposed to increased task-independent readiness. Participants performed either a pitch, a letter, or a color discrimination task within a variable foreperiod paradigm and tasks alternated regularly between auditory and visual discriminations. In separate blocks of trials, the upcoming visual discrimination task was either predictable or unpredictable. We observed the standard variable foreperiod effect for both visual discrimination tasks irrespective of task predictability. Importantly, however, the variable foreperiod effect was larger when the visual discrimination task was predictable than when it was unpredictable. These results suggest that temporal preparation in choice reaction time tasks involves increased readiness for both task-independent and task-specific processing requirements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24659170     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-014-0550-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  30 in total

1.  Intentional and unintentional contributions to nonspecific preparation during reaction time foreperiods.

Authors:  S A Los; C E van den Heuvel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Locus of the effect of temporal preparation: evidence from the lateralized readiness potential.

Authors:  Hiltraut Müller-Gethmann; Rolf Ulrich; Gerhard Rinkenauer
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Reaction time as a function of foreperiod duration and variability.

Authors:  L KARLIN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-08

4.  Time uncertainty in simple reaction time.

Authors:  E T KLEMMER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1956-03

5.  Spatial representation of pitch height: the SMARC effect.

Authors:  Elena Rusconi; Bonnie Kwan; Bruno L Giordano; Carlo Umiltà; Brian Butterworth
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-05-31

6.  Differential effects of a foreperiod countdown procedure on simple and choice reaction time.

Authors:  J Richard Simon; D P Slaviero
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 1.328

7.  Temporal predictability facilitates action, not perception.

Authors:  Roland Thomaschke; Gesine Dreisbach
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-05-22

8.  Routes to action in reaction time tasks.

Authors:  C D Frith; D J Done
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1986

9.  Response force is sensitive to the temporal uncertainty of response stimuli.

Authors:  S Mattes; R Ulrich
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-10

10.  Development of readiness to respond during short foreperiods.

Authors:  L Karlin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-10
View more
  9 in total

1.  Cross-modal decoupling in temporal attention between audition and touch.

Authors:  Stefanie Mühlberg; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-05-17

2.  Time-based event expectations employ relative, not absolute, representations of time.

Authors:  Roland Thomaschke; Marina Kunchulia; Gesine Dreisbach
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-06

3.  Transfer of time-based task expectancy across different timing environments.

Authors:  Stefanie Aufschnaiter; Andrea Kiesel; Roland Thomaschke
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-07-24

4.  Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation-Induced Effects Over the Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex: Differences in the Task Types of Task Switching.

Authors:  Ziyu Wang; Rongjuan Zhu; Xuqun You
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-03-18

5.  Time-based task expectancy: perceptual task indicator expectancy or expectancy of post-perceptual task components?

Authors:  Irina Monno; Stefanie Aufschnaiter; Sonja Ehret; Andrea Kiesel; Edita Poljac; Roland Thomaschke
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-11-16

6.  Temporal expectancy modulates stimulus-response integration.

Authors:  Philip Schmalbrock; Christian Frings
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Investigating time-based expectancy beyond binary timing scenarios: evidence from a paradigm employing three predictive pre-target intervals.

Authors:  Stefanie Aufschnaiter; Fang Zhao; Robert Gaschler; Andrea Kiesel; Roland Thomaschke
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-10-27

Review 8.  Outlines of a multiple trace theory of temporal preparation.

Authors:  Sander A Los; Wouter Kruijne; Martijn Meeter
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-19

9.  Does temporal predictability of tasks influence task choice?

Authors:  V Jurczyk; V Mittelstädt; K Fröber
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-02-17
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.