Literature DB >> 23698617

Temporal predictability facilitates action, not perception.

Roland Thomaschke1, Gesine Dreisbach.   

Abstract

Expectancy for upcoming action requirements is a fundamental prerequisite for human control of action. In the research reported here, we investigated which part of cognitive processing benefits from temporal predictability. In a binary forced-choice paradigm, visual targets were preceded by different intervals. In one condition, targets could be predicted by the length of the intervals. In other conditions, response goals or response effectors could be predicted by the length of the intervals. Behavioral advantages were observed when response effectors were temporally predictable, whereas temporal predictability of response goals and target stimuli was not sufficient. The findings thus show that temporal expectancy in speeded choice-reaction tasks facilitates late, effector-specific motor processing. These findings are of importance not only for our basic understanding of action control but also for any human-machine interaction that involves system delays.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; motor processes; temporal frequency; time estimation; time perception

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23698617     DOI: 10.1177/0956797612469411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  19 in total

1.  Task predictability influences the variable foreperiod effect: evidence of task-specific temporal preparation.

Authors:  Hannes Schröter; Teresa Birngruber; Daniel Bratzke; Jeff Miller; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-03

2.  Timing a week later: The role of long-term memory in temporal preparation.

Authors:  Rozemarijn M Mattiesing; Wouter Kruijne; Martijn Meeter; Sander A Los
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

3.  Mobilizing cognition for speeded action: try-harder instructions promote motivated readiness in the constant-foreperiod paradigm.

Authors:  Michael B Steinborn; Robert Langner; Lynn Huestegge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-09-20

4.  Time-based event expectations employ relative, not absolute, representations of time.

Authors:  Roland Thomaschke; Marina Kunchulia; Gesine Dreisbach
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-06

5.  Premature responses in the five-choice serial reaction time task reflect rodents' temporal strategies: evidence from no-light and pharmacological challenges.

Authors:  Zackary A Cope; Adam L Halberstadt; Jordy van Enkhuizen; Aaron D Flynn; Michelle Breier; Neal R Swerdlow; Mark A Geyer; Jared W Young
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Transfer of time-based task expectancy across different timing environments.

Authors:  Stefanie Aufschnaiter; Andrea Kiesel; Roland Thomaschke
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-07-24

7.  Statistical learning of spatiotemporal regularities dynamically guides visual attention across space.

Authors:  Zhenzhen Xu; Jan Theeuwes; Sander A Los
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 2.157

8.  Pupillary fluctuation amplitude preceding target presentation is linked to the variable foreperiod effect on reaction time in Psychomotor Vigilance Tasks.

Authors:  Jumpei Yamashita; Hiroki Terashima; Makoto Yoneya; Kazushi Maruya; Haruo Oishi; Takatsune Kumada
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  Children with autism spectrum disorder show increased sensitivity to time-based predictability.

Authors:  Marina Kunchulia; Tamari Tatishvili; Khatuna Parkosadze; Nino Lomidze; Roland Thomaschke
Journal:  Int J Dev Disabil       Date:  2019-02-07

10.  Time-based task expectancy: perceptual task indicator expectancy or expectancy of post-perceptual task components?

Authors:  Irina Monno; Stefanie Aufschnaiter; Sonja Ehret; Andrea Kiesel; Edita Poljac; Roland Thomaschke
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-11-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.