| Literature DB >> 24655746 |
Cun-Quan Yuan, Yu-Han Sun, Yun-Fei Li, Ke-Qi Zhao, Rui-Yang Hu, Yun Li1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pollen donor compositions differ during the early stages of reproduction due to various selection mechanisms. In addition, ovules linearly ordered within a fruit have different probabilities of reaching maturity. Few attempts, however, have been made to directly examine the magnitude and timing of selection, as well as the mechanisms during early life stages and within fruit. Robinia pseudoacacia, which contains linear fruit and non-random ovule maturation and abortion patterns, has been used to study the viability of selection within fruit and during the early stages of reproduction. To examine changes in the pollen donor composition during the early stages of reproduction and of progeny originating from different positions within fruit, paternity analyses were performed for three early life stages (aborted seeds, mature seeds and seedlings) in the insect-pollinated tree R. pseudoacacia.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24655746 PMCID: PMC3998051 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-14-53
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Figure 1Relationships between the male success contribution rate and their mating distance from known female trees.
Genetic diversity of the adult (parent) and offspring populations
| Adults | 257 | 12.3333 ± 3.4448 | 5.5003 ± 2.2874 | 0.6240 ± 0.1833 | 0.7868 ± 0.1000 | ___ |
| Aborted seeds | 240 | 12.6667 ± 3.0111 | 4.5553 ± 1.4236 | 0.5772 ± 0.1732 | 0.7632 ± 0.0769 | 0.2446 |
| Mature seeds | 240 | 9.8333 ± 1.7224 | 3.0333 ± 0.7872 | 0.6118 ± 0.2215 | 0.7345 ± 0.0759 | 0.1594 |
| Seedlings | 240 | 11.6667 ± 3.9328 | 4.5276 ± 1.3957 | 0.7525 ± 0.1927 | 0.7617 ± 0.0749 | 0.0487 |
Note: NA: actual number of alleles; NE: effective number of alleles; HO: observed heterozygosities; HE: expected heterozygosities; FIS: coefficient of breeding.
Number of self offspring at three stages from different maternal trees
| | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MT 2 | 0.0833 (4) | 0.000 (0) | 0.000 (0) |
| MT 4 | 0.2500 (12) | 0.0833 (4) | 0.0625 (3) |
| MT 7 | 0.3333 (16) | 0.1458 (7) | 0.0625 (3) |
| MT 12 | 0.4375 (21) | 0.2083 (10) | 0.0833 (4) |
| MT 17 | 0.1667 (8) | 0.0000 (0) | 0.0000 (0) |
| Total | (61) | (21) | (10) |
| Average rate | 0.2542 ± 0.1385 | 0.0875 ± 0.0913 | 0.0417 ± 0.0390 |
Outcrossing rate at four positions within fruit
| Distal ends | A | 0.8246 | 0.9048 | 0.9000 | 0.8765 ± 0.0450a | 0.6169 |
| B | 0.8070 | 0.7143 | 0.7000 | 0.7404 ± 0.0581b | ||
| Basal ends | C | 0.6491 | 0.6667 | 0.7000 | 0.6719 ± 0.0337b | 0.3831 |
| D | 0.7193 | 0.7143 | 0.7000 | 0.7112 ± 0.0100b | ||
Average values followed by the same letter were not significantly different according to Tukey’s multiple comparison test (P ≤ 0.05).
Figure 2Location of the five maternal trees and the potential pollen trees. Maternal trees are represented by black boxes with ID numbers. The potential pollen trees are represented by filled circles.
Sequences and fluorescent labels of primers for six microsatellites of
| Rops08 | HEX | (CA)8TA(CA)3 | TTCTGAGGAAGGGTTCCGTGG | 192–212 | 63 to 52 | AB075033 |
| GTTAAAGCAACAGGCACATGG | ||||||
| Rp206 | HEX | (GT)9 | GCCAAATCCCATTAGATCACAGTTGA | 200–232 | 65 to 58 | AB353932 |
| AGAAGTTAGACTTACGTGCTGC | ||||||
| Rops05 | FAM | (AC)2GC(AC)7 | TGGTGATTAAGTCGCAAG | 114–148 | 56 | AB075031 |
| GTGGTTGTGACTTGTACGTAAGTC | ||||||
| Rops06 | FAM | (GT)3ACA(GT)11 | CTAAGGAGGTGCTGACCCTC | 114–146 | 65 to 58 | AB075032 |
| TTAATCTGTGATGGGACACTG | ||||||
| Rp109 | TAMRA | (AG)17 | GAGGAATCACAAAACCGTTTGG | 119–151 | 65 to 63 | AB353930 |
| TGGGATTTGAGAGAGTGGTGGTG | ||||||
| Rp200 | TAMRA | (AG)23 | GGTTTCTTTGTTCACCTGCTCTGG | 160–185 | 65 to 60 | AB353933 |
| ACCTACGTGTCCACGGCTCT |