| Literature DB >> 27819357 |
Cunquan Yuan1,2, Yuhan Sun2, Peng Sun2,3, Yunfei Li4, Ruiyang Hu2, Keqi Zhao2, Jinxing Wang2, Yun Li2.
Abstract
Post-pollination processes can lead to nonrandom mating among compatible pollen donors. Moreover, morphological patterns of ovule development within linear fruits are reportedly nonrandom and depend on ovule position. However, little is known about the relationship between nonrandom mating and ovule position within linear fruit. Here, we combined controlled pollen competition experiments and paternity analyses on R. pseudoacacia to better understand nonrandom mating and its connection with ovule position. Molecular determination of siring success showed a significant departure from the expected ratio based on each kind of pollen mixture, suggesting a nonrandom mating. Outcrossed pollen grains, which were strongly favored, produced significantly more progeny than other pollen grains. Paternity analyses further revealed that the distribution of offspring produced by one specific pollen source was also nonrandom within linear fruit. The stylar end, which has a higher probability of maturation, produced a significantly higher number of outcrossed offspring than other offspring, suggesting a correlation between pollen source and ovule position. Our results suggested that a superior ovule position exists within the linear fruit in R. pseudoacacia, and the pollen that was strongly favored often preferentially occupies the ovules that were situated in a superior position, which ensured siring success and facilitated nonrandom mating.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27819357 PMCID: PMC5098198 DOI: 10.1038/srep36664
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Mature seed sets of different positions within the fruit from different pollen competition experiments.
| Competitive pollination combination | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Position A | Position B | Position C | Position D | ||
| Self versus Outcross | 0.3804 ± 0.0462b | 0.3915 ± 0.0507b | 0.3079 ± 0.0430b | 0.1256 ± 0.0241a | <0.0001 |
| Self versus Outcross versus Intercross | 0.5169 ± 0.0573c | 0.4163 ± 0.0499bc | 0.3240 ± 0.0458b | 0.1039 ± 0.0259a | <0.0001 |
| Outcross versus Intercross | 0.4372 ± 0.0434b | 0.4655 ± 0.0455b | 0.3797 ± 0.0423b | 0.1197 ± 0.0270a | <0.0001 |
| Mixed | 0.5317 ± 0.0588b | 0.4529 ± 0.0590b | 0.4653 ± 0.0580b | 0.1568 ± 0.0391a | <0.0001 |
Average values followed by the same letter were not significantly different (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P ≤ 0.05).
Figure 1Number of mature seed offspring produced by each pollen source in competition experiments.
Blue solid line indicates pollen mixtures of 1:1, while the long red dashed line indicates pollen mixtures with 10% bias, and the short purple dashed line indicates pollen mixtures with 20% bias. The single asterisk indicates statistically significant differences relative to the expected pollen mixture ratio (p < 0.05), the double asterisk indicates statistically significant differences relative to the expected pollen mixture ratio (p < 0.01), and ns indicates no significant difference.
Figure 2Number of seedling offspring produced by each pollen source in competition experiments.
Figure 3Percentage of total offspring in each position that the specific pollen source produced in competitive pollinations at the mature seed and seedling stages.
(a) Self versus outcross (pollen mixture of self:outcross = 1:1) at the mature seed stage, (b) Self versus outcross at the seedling stage, (c). Self versus outcross versus intercross (pollen mixture of self:outcross:intercross = 1:1:1) at the mature seed stage; (d). Self versus outcross versus intercross at the seedling stage; (e). Mixed pollination (pollen mixture of self:outcross:intercross = 1:3:3) at the mature seed stage. In position A, the observed proportion of outcrossed offspring was significantly higher than the competitors, regardless of the competitive pollination treatment.