Literature DB >> 9215977

Validation of an optoelectronic limb volumeter (Perometer).

A W Stanton1, J W Northfield, B Holroyd, P S Mortimer, J R Levick.   

Abstract

The Perometer, a device designed for the measurement of limb volume, has been rigorously assessed by comparison with other methods. Differences in the volume of geometric shapes and limbs determined by the Perometer and a tape measure/meter rule (i.e., Perometer minus direct measurement) were -0.8 to 2.4% (cylinders), -4.6% (truncated cone), -3.3% (mannequin limbs), 6.1% (normal human arms) and 6.8% (lymphedema arms). The larger differences were likely to be due to deviation from circular or elliptical cross-section (Perometer or tape method) and compression of the arm (tape method). Errors arising from incorrect positioning within the measuring frame were generally small, but large errors occurred when a cylinder was partially rotated within the frame (i.e., no longer perpendicular to the light beams). The Perometer was highly reproducible, each measurement taking only a few seconds. When recording the change in volume with time of a segment of arm during venous occlusion (blood flow measurement by venous occlusion plethysmography) using the Perometer plus a mercury strain gauge, between-method differences for individual blood flow recordings were apparent. The source of these differences is discussed. However, using the average of a number of blood flow recordings the Perometer and the strain gauge agreed fairly closely for both the normal and lymphedema arms. The Perometer is thus a reliable and convenient tool for the measurement of limb volume, and may also be used to measure the rate of swelling during venous occlusion plethysmography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9215977

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lymphology        ISSN: 0024-7766            Impact factor:   1.286


  65 in total

Review 1.  A framework for assessment in oncology rehabilitation.

Authors:  Laura S Gilchrist; Mary Lou Galantino; Meredith Wampler; Victoria G Marchese; G Stephen Morris; Kirsten K Ness
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2009-01-15

2.  Standardized approach to lymphedema screening.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Dylke; Leigh C Ward; Sharon L Kilbreath
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013

3.  Quantitative and morphologic change associated with breast cancer-related lymphedema. Comparison of 3.0T MRI to external measures.

Authors:  Gregory C Gardner; Joshua P Nickerson; Richard Watts; Lee Nelson; Kim L Dittus; Patricia J O'Brien
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.589

4.  Impact of body mass index and weight fluctuation on lymphedema risk in patients treated for breast cancer.

Authors:  Lauren S Jammallo; Cynthia L Miller; Marybeth Singer; Nora K Horick; Melissa N Skolny; Michelle C Specht; Jean O'Toole; Alphonse G Taghian
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  The women in steady exercise research (WISER) survivor trial: The innovative transdisciplinary design of a randomized controlled trial of exercise and weight-loss interventions among breast cancer survivors with lymphedema.

Authors:  Renate M Winkels; Kathleen M Sturgeon; Michael J Kallan; Lorraine T Dean; Zi Zhang; Margaret Evangelisti; Justin C Brown; David B Sarwer; Andrea B Troxel; Crystal Denlinger; Monica Laudermilk; Anna Fornash; Angela DeMichele; Lewis A Chodosh; Kathryn H Schmitz
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  Timing of Lymphedema After Treatment for Breast Cancer: When Are Patients Most At Risk?

Authors:  Susan G R McDuff; Amir I Mina; Cheryl L Brunelle; Laura Salama; Laura E G Warren; Mohamed Abouegylah; Meyha Swaroop; Melissa N Skolny; Maria Asdourian; Tessa Gillespie; Kayla Daniell; Hoda E Sayegh; George E Naoum; Hui Zheng; Alphonse G Taghian
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Randomised controlled trial to determine the benefit of daily home-based exercise in addition to self-care in the management of breast cancer-related lymphoedema: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Eunice Jeffs; Theresa Wiseman
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Screening for breast cancer-related lymphedema: the need for standardization.

Authors:  Jean O'Toole; Lauren S Jammallo; Cynthia L Miller; Melissa N Skolny; Michelle C Specht; Alphonse G Taghian
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-04-10

9.  Weight lifting in patients with lower-extremity lymphedema secondary to cancer: a pilot and feasibility study.

Authors:  Elana Katz; Nicole L Dugan; Joy C Cohn; Christina Chu; Rebecca G Smith; Kathryn H Schmitz
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Pre-operative assessment enables early diagnosis and recovery of shoulder function in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Barbara A Springer; Ellen Levy; Charles McGarvey; Lucinda A Pfalzer; Nicole L Stout; Lynn H Gerber; Peter W Soballe; Jerome Danoff
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.