Literature DB >> 12903011

The grading of lymphedema in oncology clinical trials.

Andrea L Cheville1, Charles L McGarvey, Jeanne A Petrek, Sandra A Russo, Saskia R J Thiadens, Marie E Taylor.   

Abstract

Lymphedema is a common late toxicity of cancer therapy. This article describes the rationale and process utilized by the Lymphedema Working Group for the revision and expansion of the Common Toxicity Criteria version 2 (CTC v2.0) lymphedema criteria to produce the CTC v3.0 lymphedema criteria. Established clinician-based rating scales and quantitative instruments are reviewed in this article. None of the extant rating scales have been formally validated, nor has their reliability been assessed. Drawbacks of current scales were considered in formulating CTC v3.0 criteria. Most rely exclusively on volume to diagnose and grade lymphedema. This imposes significant clinical limitations, particularly in the assessment of toxicity in oncology clinical trials. Volume-based rating scales are of little value in rating the severity of bilateral limb and nonlimb edema. Problems with nonvolumetric staging systems (eg, CTC v2.0) include insufficient detail to permit useful discrimination of severity among the majority of lymphedema patients. Technologies for objectively quantifying lymphedema have been developed and validated. Although these are briefly reviewed, it is recognized that cost and access issues limit their widespread clinical utility and, as such, were not considered in developing the CTC v3.0 criteria. The CTC v3.0 lymphedema criteria adopted several innovations. Principle among these was the decision to generate separate criteria for volumetric increase, dermal changes, and subcutaneous fibrosis. We anticipate the use of the new CTC v3.0 lymphedema criteria to begin in mid-2003 for grading the key clinical features of this disorder in oncology clinical trials. The purpose of this article is to familiarize the reader with (1) background on the clinical features of lymphedema, (2) information on established lymphedema rating systems, (3) the consensus process and rationale of the Lymphedema Working Group, (4) the new CTC v3.0, and (5) quantitative techniques for assessment of lymphedema.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12903011     DOI: 10.1016/S1053-4296(03)00038-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1053-4296            Impact factor:   5.934


  40 in total

1.  Risk factors for lymphedema in a prospective breast cancer survivorship study: the Pathways Study.

Authors:  Marilyn L Kwan; Jeanne Darbinian; Kathryn H Schmitz; Rebecca Citron; Paula Partee; Susan E Kutner; Lawrence H Kushi
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2010-11

2.  Differences of symptoms in head and neck cancer patients with and without lymphedema.

Authors:  Jie Deng; Barbara A Murphy; Mary S Dietrich; Robert J Sinard; Kyle Mannion; Sheila H Ridner
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Quantitative and morphologic change associated with breast cancer-related lymphedema. Comparison of 3.0T MRI to external measures.

Authors:  Gregory C Gardner; Joshua P Nickerson; Richard Watts; Lee Nelson; Kim L Dittus; Patricia J O'Brien
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.589

4.  Lymphedema Quality of Life Inventory (LyQLI)-Development and investigation of validity and reliability.

Authors:  Pia Klernäs; Aina Johnsson; Vibeke Horstmann; Linda J Kristjanson; Karin Johansson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Weight lifting in patients with lower-extremity lymphedema secondary to cancer: a pilot and feasibility study.

Authors:  Elana Katz; Nicole L Dugan; Joy C Cohn; Christina Chu; Rebecca G Smith; Kathryn H Schmitz
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Perometry versus simulated circumferential tape measurement for the detection of breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Authors:  Fangdi Sun; Alexander Hall; Megan P Tighe; Cheryl L Brunelle; Hoda E Sayegh; Tessa C Gillespie; Kayla M Daniell; Alphonse G Taghian
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Lifestyle risk factors associated with arm swelling among women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Shayna L Showalter; Justin C Brown; Andrea L Cheville; Carla S Fisher; Dahlia Sataloff; Kathryn H Schmitz
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Physical Activity and Lymphedema (the PAL trial): assessing the safety of progressive strength training in breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Kathryn H Schmitz; Andrea B Troxel; Andrea Cheville; Lorita L Grant; Cathy J Bryan; Cynthia R Gross; Leslie A Lytle; Rehana L Ahmed
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 9.  Balancing lymphedema risk: exercise versus deconditioning for breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Kathryn H Schmitz
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.230

10.  Effectiveness of early physiotherapy to prevent lymphoedema after surgery for breast cancer: randomised, single blinded, clinical trial.

Authors:  María Torres Lacomba; María José Yuste Sánchez; Alvaro Zapico Goñi; David Prieto Merino; Orlando Mayoral del Moral; Ester Cerezo Téllez; Elena Minayo Mogollón
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-01-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.