Literature DB >> 8615465

Stapled ileal pouch anal anastomoses are safer than handsewn anastomoses in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Y Ziv1, V W Fazio, J M Church, I C Lavery, T M King, P Ambrosetti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the theoretic advantages of using a stapled versus handsewn ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) in restorative proctocolectomy is a reduction in septic complications. We performed this study to compare the incidence of early septic complications in patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy with stapled or handsewn IPAA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A chart review of 692 patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy for treatment of ulcerative colitis was performed. The incidence of early septic complications in patients having stapled IPAA was compared to that in patients having handsewn IPAA. Follow-up studies included an annual questionnaire and physical examination.
RESULTS: Of the 692 patients, 238 had handsewn IPAA and 454 had stapled IPAA; these two groups were similar in sex, duration of disease, age at surgery, and type of surgical procedure performed. In the handsewn IPAA group, 25 patients (10.5%) had 32 septic complications, and 24 required 89 reparations. In 7 patients, the pouch was excised. In the stapled IPAA group, 21 patients (4.6%) had 23 septic complications, and 14 required 40 reparations. One patient needed pouch excision. There were more patients (P=0.0001) with early septic complications, and more (P<0.0001) pouch excisions because of these complications, in patients with handsewn IPAA than in patients with stapled IPAA. The sepsis-related reoperation rates did not differ significantly.
CONCLUSIONS: The stapled technique for IPAA has fewer septic complications and results in fewer sepsis-related pouch excisions, in our hands, than the handsewn technique technique, for treating patients with ulcerative colitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8615465     DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9610(97)89634-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  26 in total

Review 1.  Proctocolectomy with ileoanal anastomosis.

Authors:  James M Becker; Arthur F Stucchi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  A comparison of hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) following proctocolectomy: a meta-analysis of 4183 patients.

Authors:  Richard E Lovegrove; Vasilis A Constantinides; Alexander G Heriot; Thanos Athanasiou; Ara Darzi; Feza H Remzi; R John Nicholls; Victor W Fazio; Paris P Tekkis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Anal transition zone in the surgical management of ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Jennifer Holder-Murray; Alessandro Fichera
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Role of ileostomy in restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  Gianluca Pellino; Guido Sciaudone; Silvestro Canonico; Francesco Selvaggi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Complications of ileoanal pouches.

Authors:  Emre Gorgun; Feza H Remzi
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2004-02

6.  Technical aspects of ileoanal pouch surgery.

Authors:  Peter W G Carne; John H Pemberton
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2004-02

7.  Reoperative inflammatory bowel disease surgery.

Authors:  Rowena L Ramirez; Phillip Fleshner
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2006-11

8.  Inherited colorectal cancer syndromes.

Authors:  C Neal Ellis
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-08

9.  Colonic adenomatous polyposis syndromes: clinical management.

Authors:  C Neal Ellis
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-11

Review 10.  Completion mucosectomy for retained rectal mucosa following restorative proctocolectomy with double-stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  Maria E Litzendorf; Arthur F Stucchi; Susana Wishnia; Amy Lightner; James M Becker
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.