Literature DB >> 24648563

Concordance between molecular and phenotypic testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates for resistance to rifampin and isoniazid in the United States.

Mitchell A Yakrus1, Jeffrey Driscoll2, Allison J Lentz2, David Sikes2, Denise Hartline2, Beverly Metchock2, Angela M Starks2.   

Abstract

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) are defined by resistance to at least rifampin (RMP) and isoniazid (INH). Rapid and accurate detection of multidrug resistance is essential for effective treatment and interruption of disease transmission of tuberculosis (TB). Overdiagnosis of MDR TB may result in treatment with second-line drugs that are more costly, less effective, and more poorly tolerated than first-line drugs. CDC offers rapid confirmation of MDR TB by the molecular detection of drug resistance (MDDR) for mutations associated with resistance to RMP and INH along with analysis for resistance to other first-line and second-line drugs. Simultaneously, CDC does growth-based phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) by the indirect agar proportion method for a panel of first-line and second-line antituberculosis drugs. We reviewed discordance between molecular and phenotypic DST for INH and RMP for 285 isolates submitted as MTBC to CDC from September 2009 to February 2011. We compared CDC's results with those from the submitting public health laboratories (PHL). Concordances between molecular and phenotypic testing at CDC were 97.4% for RMP and 92.5% for INH resistance. Concordances between CDC's molecular testing and PHL DST results were 93.9% for RMP and 90.0% for INH. Overall concordance between CDC molecular and PHL DST results was 91.7% for RMP and INH collectively. Discordance was primarily attributable to the absence of known INH resistance mutations in isolates found to be INH resistant by DST and detection of mutations associated with low-level RMP resistance in isolates that were RMP susceptible by phenotypic DST. Both molecular and phenotypic test results should be considered for the diagnosis of MDR TB.
Copyright © 2014, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24648563      PMCID: PMC4042757          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00417-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  10 in total

1.  American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Infectious Diseases Society of America: treatment of tuberculosis.

Authors:  Henry M Blumberg; William J Burman; Richard E Chaisson; Charles L Daley; Sue C Etkind; Lloyd N Friedman; Paula Fujiwara; Malgosia Grzemska; Philip C Hopewell; Michael D Iseman; Robert M Jasmer; Venkatarama Koppaka; Richard I Menzies; Richard J O'Brien; Randall R Reves; Lee B Reichman; Patricia M Simone; Jeffrey R Starke; Andrew A Vernon
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Performance of tuberculosis drug susceptibility testing in U.S. laboratories from 1994 to 2008.

Authors:  Pawan K Angra; Thomas H Taylor; Michael F Iademarco; Beverly Metchock; J Rex Astles; John C Ridderhof
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Rifampin drug resistance tests for tuberculosis: challenging the gold standard.

Authors:  Armand Van Deun; Kya J M Aung; Valentin Bola; Rossin Lebeke; Mohamed Anwar Hossain; Willem Bram de Rijk; Leen Rigouts; Aysel Gumusboga; Gabriela Torrea; Bouke C de Jong
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Global isoniazid resistance patterns in rifampin-resistant and rifampin-susceptible tuberculosis.

Authors:  S E Smith; E V Kurbatova; J S Cavanaugh; J P Cegielski
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Clinical failures associated with rpoB mutations in phenotypically occult multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  D A Williamson; S A Roberts; J E Bower; R Vaughan; S Newton; O Lowe; C A Lewis; J T Freeman
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Low-level rifampicin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains raise a new therapeutic challenge.

Authors:  J van Ingen; R Aarnoutse; G de Vries; M J Boeree; D van Soolingen
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Molecular detection of mutations associated with first- and second-line drug resistance compared with conventional drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Patricia J Campbell; Glenn P Morlock; R David Sikes; Tracy L Dalton; Beverly Metchock; Angela M Starks; Delaina P Hooks; Lauren S Cowan; Bonnie B Plikaytis; James E Posey
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains with highly discordant rifampin susceptibility test results.

Authors:  A Van Deun; L Barrera; I Bastian; L Fattorini; H Hoffmann; K M Kam; L Rigouts; S Rüsch-Gerdes; A Wright
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Rifampin resistance missed in automated liquid culture system for Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates with specific rpoB mutations.

Authors:  Leen Rigouts; Mourad Gumusboga; Willem Bram de Rijk; Elie Nduwamahoro; Cécile Uwizeye; Bouke de Jong; Armand Van Deun
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Availability of an assay for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis, including rifampin-resistant strains, and considerations for its use - United States, 2013.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 17.586

  10 in total
  13 in total

1.  Systematic Review of Mutations Associated with Isoniazid Resistance Points to Continuing Evolution and Subsequent Evasion of Molecular Detection, and Potential for Emergence of Multidrug Resistance in Clinical Strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Siavash J Valafar
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Discordance between Xpert MTB/RIF assay and Bactec MGIT 960 Culture System for detection of rifampin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in a country with a low tuberculosis (TB) incidence.

Authors:  Eiman Mokaddas; Suhail Ahmad; Hanaa S Eldeen; Noura Al-Mutairi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Validation of Novel Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isoniazid Resistance Mutations Not Detectable by Common Molecular Tests.

Authors:  Justin L Kandler; Alexandra D Mercante; Tracy L Dalton; Matthew N Ezewudo; Lauren S Cowan; Scott P Burns; Beverly Metchock; Peter Cegielski; James E Posey
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Multiplex detection of extensively drug resistant tuberculosis using binary deoxyribozyme sensors.

Authors:  Hillary N Bengtson; Susanne Homolka; Stefan Niemann; Ana Júlia Reis; Pedro Eduardo da Silva; Yulia V Gerasimova; Dmitry M Kolpashchikov; Kyle H Rohde
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 10.618

5.  Clinical implications of discrepant results between genotypic MTBDRplus and phenotypic Löwenstein-Jensen method for isoniazid or rifampicin drug susceptibility tests in tuberculosis patients.

Authors:  Ji Young Kang; Jung Hur; Shinyoung Kim; Sanghoon Jeon; Jaeha Lee; Youn Jeong Kim; Seok Chan Kim; Yeon Joon Park; Young Kyoon Kim; Hwa Sik Moon
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Evaluation of a u.s. Public health laboratory service for the molecular detection of drug resistant tuberculosis.

Authors:  Mitchell A Yakrus; Beverly Metchock; Angela M Starks
Journal:  Tuberc Res Treat       Date:  2015-02-22

7.  A Comparison of the Sensititre MycoTB Plate, the Bactec MGIT 960, and a Microarray-Based Molecular Assay for the Detection of Drug Resistance in Clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates in Moscow, Russia.

Authors:  Elena Y Nosova; Danila V Zimenkov; Anastasia A Khakhalina; Alexandra I Isakova; Ludmila Y Krylova; Marina V Makarova; Ksenia Y Galkina; Maria A Krasnova; Svetlana G Safonova; Vitaly I Litvinov; Dmitry A Gryadunov; Elena M Bogorodskaya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Frequency and Type of Disputed rpoB Mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates from South Korea.

Authors:  Kyung-Wook Jo; Soyeon Lee; Mi Ran Kang; Heungsup Sung; Mi-Na Kim; Tae Sun Shim
Journal:  Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul)       Date:  2017-07-03

9.  Discordance across Phenotypic and Molecular Methods for Drug Susceptibility Testing of Drug-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates in a Low TB Incidence Country.

Authors:  Suhail Ahmad; Eiman Mokaddas; Noura Al-Mutairi; Hanaa S Eldeen; Shirin Mohammadi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Molecular and Growth-Based Drug Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex for Ethambutol Resistance in the United States.

Authors:  Mitchell A Yakrus; Jeffrey Driscoll; Allison McAlister; David Sikes; Denise Hartline; Beverly Metchock; Angela M Starks
Journal:  Tuberc Res Treat       Date:  2016-06-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.