Literature DB >> 24647867

Is de novo stress incontinence after sacrocolpopexy related to anatomical changes and surgical approach?

Edgar L LeClaire1, Marium S Mukati, Dianna Juarez, Dena White, Lieschen H Quiroz.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to investigate the relationship between new onset postoperative stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after sacrocolpopexy (SCP) and anatomical change/surgical approach.
METHODS: We analyzed a retrospective cohort of patients with negative preoperative testing for SUI who underwent SCP from 2005 to 2012. Our primary outcome was new onset postoperative SUI. Logistic regression was used to examine the relationship among anatomical change, defined as ΔAa, ΔBa, ΔC, and ΔTVL, and surgical approach, categorized as abdominal (ASCP) for open cases and minimally invasive (MISCP) for laparoscopic and robot-assisted cases, and postoperative SUI.
RESULTS: Of 795 cases, 33 ASCP (43%) and 44 MISCP (57%) met the inclusion criteria for analysis. New onset SUI was demonstrated by 15 patients (45%) of the ASCP group and 7 patients (15%) of the MISCP group (p = 0.005). New onset SUI was significantly associated with route of SCP and ΔAa (p = 0.006 and p = 0.033 respectively). Controlling for ΔAa, the odds of new onset SUI were 4.4 times higher in the ASCP group compared with the MISCP group (OR 4.37, 95% CI 1.42, 13.48). Controlling for route of SCP, the odds of new onset SUI were 2.2 times higher with moderate ΔAa compared with low ΔAa (OR 2.16 95% CI 1.07, 4.38). The odds of new onset SUI was 4.7 times higher in those with high ΔAa than in those with low ΔAa (OR 4.67 95% CI 1.14, 19.22). ΔBa, ΔC, and ΔTVL were not associated with new onset SUI.
CONCLUSIONS: Greater reduction in point Aa and abdominal surgical route are risk factors for new onset postoperative SUI after SCP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24647867     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-014-2366-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  21 in total

1.  Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979-1997.

Authors:  Sarah Hamilton Boyles; Anne M Weber; Leslie Meyn
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  R C Bump; A Mattiasson; K Bø; L P Brubaker; J O DeLancey; P Klarskov; B L Shull; A R Smith
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Predicting postoperative urinary incontinence development in women undergoing operation for genitourinary prolapse.

Authors:  A Bergman; P P Koonings; C A Ballard
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Laparoscopic management of incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Anna C Frick; Marie Fidela R Paraiso
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.190

5.  Long term review of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  P J Higgs; H-L Chua; A R B Smith
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  Abdominal approach to vaginal eversion.

Authors:  W A Addison; M C Timmons
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.190

7.  Prevalence of abnormal urodynamic test results in continent women with severe genitourinary prolapse.

Authors:  B A Rosenzweig; S Pushkin; D Blumenfeld; N N Bhatia
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 8.  Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Ingrid E Nygaard; Rebecca McCreery; Linda Brubaker; AnnaMarie Connolly; Geoff Cundiff; Anne M Weber; Halina Zyczynski
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 9.  Epidemiology and natural history of pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  R C Bump; P A Norton
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study.

Authors:  R M Freeman; K Pantazis; A Thomson; J Frappell; L Bombieri; P Moran; M Slack; P Scott; M Waterfield
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 2.894

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Heterogeneity in post-intervention prolapse and urinary outcome reporting: a one-year review of the International Urogynecology Journal.

Authors:  Dobrochna Globerman; Magali Robert
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Comments on LeClaire et al.: is de novo stress incontinence after sacrocolpopexy related to anatomical changes and surgical approach?

Authors:  Robin M F van der Weiden; Mariëlla I J Withagen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Is de novo stress incontinence after sacrocolpopexy related to anatomical changes and surgical approach? Response to comments by van der Weiden and Withagen.

Authors:  Edgar L LeClaire; Lieschen H Quiroz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Medium term anatomical and functional outcomes following modified laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Auran Rosanne B Cortes; Tokumasa Hayashi; Masayoshi Nomura; Yugo Sawada; Shino Tokiwa; Mika Nagae
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 1.932

5.  "Central Road" cystoscopic finding: The road to worsened incontinence following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Kumiko Kato; Yasukuni Yoshimura; Masahiro Narushima; Shoji Suzuki; Ryohei Hattori
Journal:  IJU Case Rep       Date:  2020-07-01

6.  Urinary and sexual impact of pelvic reconstructive surgery for genital prolapse by surgical route. A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Renaud de Tayrac; Michel Cosson; Laure Panel; Clara Compan; Mohammed Zakarya Zemmache; Sophie Bouvet; Laurent Wagner; Brigitte Fatton; Géry Lamblin
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 1.932

7.  A Novel Operative Procedure for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Utilizing a MRI-Visible Mesh Implant: Safety and Outcome of Modified Laparoscopic Bilateral Sacropexy.

Authors:  Ralf Joukhadar; Gabriele Meyberg-Solomayer; Amr Hamza; Julia Radosa; Werner Bader; Dimitri Barski; Fakher Ismaeel; Guenther Schneider; Erich Solomayer; Sascha Baum
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Surgical Outcomes and Safety of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy in Women With Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Authors:  Hyun Hwan Sung; Kwang Jin Ko; Yoon Seok Suh; Gyu Ha Ryu; Kyu-Sung Lee
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 9.  Robotic-assisted repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a scoping review of the literature.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Schachar; Catherine A Matthews
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-04

10.  Laparoscopic pectopexy: initial experience of single center with a new technique for apical prolapse surgery.

Authors:  Ahmet Kale; Alper Biler; Hasan Terzi; Taner Usta; Ebru Kale
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.541

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.