Bianca Brijnath1, Danielle Mazza, Nabita Singh, Agnieszka Kosny, Rasa Ruseckaite, Alex Collie. 1. Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, School of Primary Care, Monash University, Building 1, 270 Ferntree Gully Rd., Notting Hill, Melbourne, VIC, 3168, Australia, bianca.brijnath@monash.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Mental health conditions (MHC) are an increasing reason for claiming injury compensation in Australia; however little is known about how these claims are managed by different gatekeepers to injury entitlements. This study, drawing on the views of four stakeholders-general practitioners (GPs), injured persons, employers and compensation agents, aims to describe current management of MHC claims and to identify the current barriers to return to work (RTW) for injured persons with a MHC claim and/or mental illness. METHODS: Ninety-three in-depth interviews were undertaken with GPs, compensation agents, employers and injured persons. Data were collected in Melbourne, Australia. Thematic techniques were used to analyse data. RESULTS: MHC claims were complex to manage because of initial assessment and diagnostic difficulties related to the invisibility of the injury, conflicting medical opinions and the stigma associated with making a MHC claim. Mental illness also developed as a secondary issue in the recovery process. These factors made MHC difficult to manage and impeded timely RTW. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to undertake further research (e.g. guideline development) to improve current practice in order to enable those with MHC claims to make a timely RTW. Further education and training interventions (e.g. on diagnosis and management of MHC) are also needed to enable GPs, employers and compensation agents to better assess and manage MHC claims.
PURPOSE: Mental health conditions (MHC) are an increasing reason for claiming injury compensation in Australia; however little is known about how these claims are managed by different gatekeepers to injury entitlements. This study, drawing on the views of four stakeholders-general practitioners (GPs), injured persons, employers and compensation agents, aims to describe current management of MHC claims and to identify the current barriers to return to work (RTW) for injured persons with a MHC claim and/or mental illness. METHODS: Ninety-three in-depth interviews were undertaken with GPs, compensation agents, employers and injured persons. Data were collected in Melbourne, Australia. Thematic techniques were used to analyse data. RESULTS: MHC claims were complex to manage because of initial assessment and diagnostic difficulties related to the invisibility of the injury, conflicting medical opinions and the stigma associated with making a MHC claim. Mental illness also developed as a secondary issue in the recovery process. These factors made MHC difficult to manage and impeded timely RTW. CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to undertake further research (e.g. guideline development) to improve current practice in order to enable those with MHC claims to make a timely RTW. Further education and training interventions (e.g. on diagnosis and management of MHC) are also needed to enable GPs, employers and compensation agents to better assess and manage MHC claims.
Authors: Cecilia S M Chong; Megumi Tsunaka; Hector W H Tsang; Edward P Chan; Wai Ming Cheung Journal: Altern Ther Health Med Date: 2011 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.305
Authors: Gunnel M Ostlund; Karin E Borg; Peter Wide; Gunnel K E Hensing; Kristina A E Alexanderson Journal: Scand J Public Health Date: 2003 Impact factor: 3.021
Authors: Alex Collie; Sharon Newnam; Helen Keleher; Alan Petersen; Agnieszka Kosny; Adam P Vogel; Jason Thompson Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2019-03